Arguments Against Standardized Testing

682 Words3 Pages

Testing has been a major part of the American education system. The ideas of a classroom or school with out test is unimaginable. High-stakes testing serve two major roles: regulate the instruction occurring in classroom and to be a tool for accountability in determining the allocation of fund (Madaus & Russel, 2016).
With testing many things must to be taken into account; what should a learner know, how do we assess it, what is proficiency, which type of assessment are cheaper, which type of assessments are more reliable, what are the impacts of the test, and what remediation should be given (Cizek, 2001).

Arguments for High-Stakes Test
A strong argument in favor of standardized testing is that fact that they and are reliable and objective. …show more content…

This is in the eyes of many the most beneficial use of standardized testing. As teacher and schools that fail to meet the expected learning target for students can be held responsible. School that fail in the education of students can face sever examination and in some cases have had to be taken over by the state in order to insure the education of young students. In some cases, teachers and administrators who fail to educate have lost their jobs and in the most intense cases school have had to shut down (About Education, …show more content…

This led to Ella being unfocused and needing additional breaks, per an EIP accommodation.
This story lead to the second argument. Standardized tests are not just for students who are English Language Learner or have Individualized Education Plans. These test require that students take test on grade level even when the learner might be two or three grade levels behind due to a particular learning disability. It also requires that students who have not yet mastered the English language to take test that they are not ready to comprehend because they are in the process of acquiring a new language (ProCon.org, Standardized Tests, 2016).
Continuing, standardized test evaluates a student’s performance and not their level of growth. A student may have made great strides in the past year but that is not taken into consideration. This is a disservice and does not honor that amount of work, time and dedication a teacher and more importantly the learner might have made in the last year (About Education,