Arguments Against Standardized Testing

733 Words3 Pages

The fact that standardized test can decide one’s future intensifies the pressure bestowed on a high school student. Many people have different opinions towards these type of exams, ranging from college admissions required to use these exams for their admission process to some arguing against these exams not being an accurate measure of one’s true potential. Standardized testing in the college admissions process does not clearly emphasize a student’s knowledge and intelligence. I believe that these exams should not remain as an important factor in admissions decisions. The elimination of exam scores will create a fair admissions process, it will also help those who can’t afford the price these exams can cost, and will relieve the stress of many students.
First and …show more content…

These exams tend to test and focus mainly on core subjects, hindering creative and out of the box thinking. I personally did not like any of my core subject courses I took. I saw this exam to be dull and boring base on the material in the exams and the time it took. Having to sit in a chair for around three hours, plus having to go over material I didn’t like made me question whether or not I should take these exams seriously. One’s true capacity and potential shouldn’t be measured through some exams but rather measured by what they have accomplished outside these standardized testing. Exams like these don’t measure the capabilities and outcomes a student would have in the future such as with school, or the workforce. In one of the assigned readings “No, the SAT is not Required” the author quotes a student who said “I just don’t like how they dictate your future” and “Very poor predictors of success.” These quotes tie in to how these exams can have a significant impact towards someone’s future. The fact that these exams can decide your future is just plain outrageous. All it is measuring is whether or not someone knows the exam