ipl-logo

Schools Should Reevaluate High-Stakes Testing In Schools

799 Words4 Pages

High-stake standardized testing is a controversial topic. Teachers and students either adapt well to the testing or struggle to find the good that comes from it. High-stake testing is in effect to determine where students stand. It shows the state if the teachers are ready to teach and if the studnets have tetained the information taught. High-stake testing is suppose to help teachers and students become well equipped in the future. However, it seems to contradict what teachers are trying to establish for students. Schools should reevaluate high-stake testing because tests are not accurately graded, tests are intelligence based, and tests creates curriculum conformity. High-stake tests are not accurately graded and are inconsistent. Students’ futures are in the hands of these unbiased scorers, yet these employees have an …show more content…

These tests control what and how instructors teach. In addition, the students are limited in what they can write about. Au and Gourd give an example stating “…teachers report that how they teach writing, as well as the types of writing students are asked to perform are being controlled by high-stakes tests” (Au and Gourd 14-19). Instructors are showing their students a certain format that will be found on the test, instead of teaching them a writing style that can help through the years of essays to come. They are not giving studnets the tools on how to write, but they are showing the studnets how to pass a test. Mike Watanbe, a researcher, found that “…writing has “become less” like a real writer writes’ in that the focus of writing has shifted to form over content and product or process” (cited in Au, Gourd 14-19). These mandated tests causes the voive of the studnets to not be heard. The content inside the essays have lost the meaning and is all about the product and to pass the test. Therefore, high-stake testing should be reevaluated to save the meaning of

Show More
Related
266 Words | 2 Pages

I applaud the American Evaluation Association (AEA) in taking a strong stance on the deleterious effects of high stakes testing, especially going so far as to promulgate their reasons and concerns. It is obvious from the statement that the AEA supports the importance of testing and accountability in improving education, but finds the current testing manipulation environment to be harmful for any positive improvements in education. Specifically, how the monolithic testing focus has increased dropout rates, created cultural insensitivity, turned the community against teachers and administrators, and driven curriculum writing with a myopic focus, of teaching to the test. In addition, the AEA highlights other adverse effects of narrowing the focus

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

In Kathy William’s “Failing Our Kids” she states, “Students often initialize the judgements of the tests, as if test scores were the final word on one’s knowledge or potential”(9). This is one issue that has been around for a long time, it goes beyond the actual test scores. Standardized tests, commonly referred to as high stakes tests are very common throughout the United States. These tests such as, SATs, ACTs, GREs and etc., come with many different names but they all serve the same purpose. What makes a test high stakes is the way the testing scores are being used; for example, if the tests are used to make important decisions then they will be considered high stakes .These tests are used to measure the performance of students, determine

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

They argue that the fact that the results of this test can be seen by all parties involved in the education system allows for accountability on the parts of all involved if test results are not where they should be. They argue that this helps educators by ensuring that all, fourth graders for instance, are being taught the same material and are being tested with the same standardized test across the country. This is seen as being extremely beneficial in that it allows for specific districts and school to make the required adjustments in any area that they fall short off versus the national results. It is also seen by these proponents as helping teachers minimize time wasted trying to put together their curriculum by giving them guidance on what to teach allowing them to focus on educating the children under their

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

As a result, some schools are finding it tough to score above average on these test giving teachers no option, but to focus solely on learning outcomes that meet high stake test requirements. Additionally, students with low test score were always pressured by their teacher to achieve high test, scores and when they did not produce higher results, some educator, believed, if they punished the student they would become more serious with schooling and work hard to avoid the pressure or humiliating punishments (Hurley, 2007). I used to be an advocate of high stakes testing, but now I oppose high stakes testing sine I have seen first hand myself the damage it does to a student. Also, I several educators and professional use high stakes test results as a single indicator for measuring a person's competence or determining their future outcome, even though research has proven these tests is highly

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Hi, Nicole I was enjoying reading your post for this week. High-stakes testing is one of the biggest stressors in the education field. It’s a huge weight we bear every day. Although I am not full time in a single classroom, high-stakes testing worries me greatly.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

In “High-stakes Testing and Student Achievement,” by Sharon L. Nichols, Gene V Glass, and David C. Berliner the three give their point of views on how the policy seekers use this method to visual teacher’s and their progress with the students. Yet there is still yet any sort of evidence that shows the students process in their education learning with these sort of high stake testing. It more so shows the statistics of students dropping out of school or not completing the school year on a positive note, but this was not their intention. Julian Heilig, who wrote “As good As Advertised?...” discuss about how the accountability policies being given off with the urban education system properly. Apparently Heilig tells us that the account policies have impacted on students helping and encouraging them to stay in school creating a change on the student’s propaganda.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

To oppose the pro-standerdized tests, stricter testing decreases student achievement. They feel like the test are "life or death," Therefore memorizing facts opposed to actually learning them. That gives the impression that sudents arent actually learning anything. In conclusion, Removing the tests completly or at least making them smaller would impact future generations wholesale.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

As “Education week 's” Ron Wolk’s has said, “The system failed to educate them adequately, and now it punishes them for not being educated. " Ron Wolk is stating that with a school district failing to educate its students, these students have to pay the price by failing the test. High Stakes testing may also affect the district. Low scores could result in the reorganization of schools or a shift of resources to charter schools or private-school vouchers. Who knew that one test could severely damage a community and school

Read More
1110 Words | 5 Pages

Discussion Post- Chapter 7- High stakes testing Claim: High stakes testing is an extremely problematic political issue within the education system because it holds all students to the same standards regardless of disabilities or disadvantages , it encourages educators to teach strictly on information that relates to the tests, and it can have major consequences for schools across the country that are unable to make Adequete Yearly Progress (AYP). Evidence: The Learning to Teach Edition Nine textbook outlines key disadvantages to high stakes testing. Although the textbook does consider some of the advantages, which include a focus of attention on the achievement of students and providing information on areas where students may need to improve,

Read More
1419 Words | 6 Pages

There could be a middle ground reached between opponents and proponents of standardized testing if the major issues were addressed first which were previously mentioned. High stakes testing is not the way to get opponents on board for standardized testing and not holding schools accountable

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

There is a Problem with Standardized Testing In today’s education department, the success of a student is determined by their ability to excel on a standardized test. However, society is starting to debate whether standardized tests should actually determine whether a student passes to the next level. In both Anaya Kamenetz’s book and TV documentary, The Test: Why Our Schools Are Obsessed with Standardized Testing but You Don’t Have to Be, she describes problems in within the school system, ultimately leading the corruption and mistrust of the school system. The book review and Book TV have a lot of similarities and differences regarding the way the author’s views are expressed.

Read More
206 Words | 1 Pages

Some educators say that the use of standardized tests should be increased because there are many professional fields where it is necessary to test a person’s knowledge in order to examine individuals for a position. According to Donald McAdams, “Physicians, lawyers, accountants, financial planners, real-estate brokers, and pilots all take high-stakes tests. These tests ensure that professionals have the knowledge necessary to serve the public well” (“Is the Use of Standardized Tests Improving Education in America"). While tests may be effective in certain professions, standardized tests can be an ineffective to measure a student’s academic performance. Standardized tests cover a broad area of diverse subjects while high-stakes test focus on

Read More
1809 Words | 8 Pages

They are used for accountability and can decide which schools and teachers are effectively doing their job. Alternatively, low-stakes tests are used to measure academic achievement and adjust teaching/learning practices. The difference between high and low stakes testing is not the type of test itself, rather the impact of the results. For students, high-stakes testing can be used to determine whether they can move on to the next grade level. For schools, high-stakes tests can have an impact on decisions for penalties, like negative ratings, staff replacement, or even the closing of the school.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Standardized testing can cause a lot of stress on both educators and students. Very good teachers quit teaching every day because of how much stress is on them to prepare students to perform on standardized tests. They feel a considerable amount of pressure to improve testing scores. According to NEAToday say that "Despite the elevated level of overall satisfaction, nearly half (45 percent) of surveyed member teachers have considered quitting because of standardized testing". Students especially feel the stress when there is something meaningful tied to them meaning that some parents threaten to take away something that they value

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

This method will prevent students from gaining the knowledge they seek and will not work to their advantage later on in the future. Most high school classes are teaching students how to take tests rather than teaching them how to skilfully answer them and master them. This causes students to enter college and university unprepared as they develop little skill-making abilities. High-stake standardized testing, such as the SAT, is burdensome for students. The standardized test scores that a student receives determine which university a student can attend and this greatly impacts his or her future.

Read More

More about Schools Should Reevaluate High-Stakes Testing In Schools

Related Topics

Open Document