ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

2175 Words9 Pages

Sweating, heart pounding, pencil tapping, and fighting the urge to look left or right. Many have felt this terrible feeling, most notably as the feeling during a standardized test. A standardized test is a test that is administered and scored in a consistent, or "standard", manner. Standardized tests are designed in such a way that the questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. Ever since 2002, when the No Child Left Behind Act was signed by George Bush, students have been given yearly tests which are used to determine the student’s intelligence within a short amount of time. Many people disagree with standardized testing. These people argue that standardized testing causes extremely high pressure/stress to do well. The ACT or SAT are used in college admissions, so that causes a student with expectations of getting into college to feel pressure to do well on these tests. The difference of a couple numbers of his/her score …show more content…

This sends a red flag for the future about the kind of people that will be running the United States. They may be goal oriented, but being people oriented is also an important quality to have. Part of the blame falls upon the educators, administrators, and states for not speaking out, but most of the blame lies with the government for increasing standards in a way that is mentally unhealthy. Standardized tests do not prepare students for reality and skills needed in life. Problem solving for life, which is yet again critical for the adult world, has not been focused on in standardized intelligence tests. Students come out of school knowing algebra, history, and science, yet lack the abilities to be a fully functioning member of society and to better their lives for the greater good of

Open Document