ipl-logo

Arguments For Animal Use In Scientific Experiments

1186 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What is the argument for animal rights

This second section will discuss the other side of the debate—for animal use in scientific experiments. Like in the previous discussion, I have divided this debate into three separate sections.

Power & Dominion Like those who argue against animal experimentation, some individuals who argue for it, have a philosophy as well. From my research, I have noted that many of these individuals base their philosophy on the idea of power and dominion. A power that only humans possess, and therefore have dominion over all non-human animals. Religion justification is one of the main ways in which scientists argue for animal research. In an empirical study, Pru Hobson-West conducted interviews with 18 laboratory scientists to discuss their views on …show more content…

In the ancient Greek times, the use of live animals for knowledge never raised any moral debate. But rather using these animals to gain knowledge meant power, and a way of being closer to the divine, and establishing a higher rank in the chain of being (hierarchy where all living and non-living are ranked according to their closeness to the divine) (Franco, 2013, p. 239). This could have been the starting point to which the philosophy of dominion over all beings, has started.
Government Support: Politics & Law Government support through policies and regulations, allow laboratories and companies to conduct animal research lawfully. Though there was not much written about this argument, it is important to include this topic in this debate. However, government support in animal experimentation is evident through the implementation of laws and policies both to regulate animal research, as well to take action against those who oppose it. Scientists themselves agree that with the help of government law and policies, they are protected from the critiques of the public, and animal activists (West, 2012, p. 656). In general, federal law (U.S Government) implements regulations and policies that focus on the standards for basic animal welfare (Latham, 2012, par. 10), rather than just banning the use of animal experimentation all …show more content…

The structure for both sources are for the most part the same. For example, they both include an introduction, or a brief description about what the page, or publication will be talking about, as well as a conclusion. Both sources also kept the reader’s attention by using engaging language both at the beginning of the reading, and

Show More
Related
1750 Words | 7 Pages

The controversy within animal testing has continued to grow splitting the activists from the scientists. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services referred to these supporters as not activists but “terrorists” for hindering their research opportunities (13) Freelance writer, David Masci, attempts to address

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Critics have claimed that the results from an animal cannot generalize over to people, and while this can be true, assumptions about human behavior based on animal research takes into consideration data from descriptive as well as experimental studies with people. The second objection to animal research is that it has no practical value as the research only provides facts that are only useful to a theoretician. While this might sometimes be the case the findings from animal research have been able to be put to good use in topics such as child rearing, sports, and education. Lastly, many critics are quick to say that animal research is unethical as people have no more right to experiment on animals as animals have to experiment on people. While there are ethical concerns that should be taken seriously these concerns beg the question of if it is unethical to use animals in research what about eating them, what about forcing them to be our pets or what about using animals on

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

This article is targeted for people interested in animal rights, experiments on them, and alternative testing methods. Poste’s purpose for writing this

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

This book was published in New York in 2000, by Chris Hayhurst, who is a professional freelance writer in Boston. This book is about the focus of science and society on animal testing. Hayhurst stake is that animals do have rights and people need to be aware of. The claim of this writing is that over the years there have been debates over the rights of animals in today’s science. The purpose of this book is to discuss animals and how they a similar to humans and they have rights too.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Alone in the United States, a calculated seventy million animals are murdered for “scientific benefit” in the hands of household products, government agencies, cosmetics companies, scientific centers, and educational institutions. Although it may appear to be beneficial to test on animals it is actually hurting the innocent animals population in large numbers, and at a rapid pace. Innocent animals are being harmed and killed for the benefit of a human's safety. Most people claim animal testing is the correct choice while others oppose it, as it is improper and unlawful. Although some people think the good outweighs the negative, the harm being caused to these animals cannot be undone.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
2063 Words | 9 Pages

These experimentation usually takes place at Universities, medical schools, Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. As a result, ( introductory phrase) a study made by University of Harvard states that “more than 70,000 animals die each year due to running experiments on them.” Therefore from my point of view, animal experimentation should be reduced due to the drawback it has regarding to animal lives as it leads to the torture and suffering of animals. In addition, the final outcome of these experiments is not always

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Noah Berlatsky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint."

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Experimenting on animals has been a very controversial matter for the last few decades and a lot of people had many arguments about this topic, a statistic has been made and it was found that more than 15 million animals are used in experiments, 90% of the United States animals are used in laboratories, 12 million are used in Europe, till now people haven’t reach a solution to this matter yet. Some people agree with experimenting on animals for scientific and medication reasons while other people disagree with it for religious and ethical reasons. Animals are just pets that you could raise at home, animals are used in scientific researches to help in making and developing medicines and it has been a great success since nearly every medical

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

“There is compelling justification for using animals in laboratory research: Science using animals cures diseases and mitigates the suffering of human beings, among other animals” (Webb). The debates that take place about this controversial topic will remain as there are both pros and cons to killing animals according to some people. One person may find their own animals more imperative than most people. “Johnson feels that the IACUC and other regulatory structures work, helping researchers navigate the ethics of animal research” (Webb). In these two quotes, Webb explains the two controversial topics of animal rights.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

While viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the centuries, medical doctors have researched on live animals to find cure to several diseases which affect both the animals and humans. Even though many people endure this practice as noble, some people still look down at animal experimentation as a cruel and inhumane treatment to animals. The government has already authorized animal experimentation to mitigate the unrest by those people. In fact, The Animal Welfare Act covered most lab animals, and provided guidelines for pain alleviation during procedures, food, and housing. However, the government still has to take more action to spread the awareness about the benefits of animal experimentation (Person).

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year, millions of animals were suffering or killed due to scientific research. Some animal rights groups suggest that we should ban animal experiments because use animals for experimentation is cruel and animals should have the same right of living as human beings. A report from U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. There are some other people believe that the death of animals will help and save millions of human lives. Personally I believe that the experimentation on animals for scientific and medical should not be stopped.

Read More

More about Arguments For Animal Use In Scientific Experiments

Related Topics

Open Document