ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

797 Words4 Pages

Experimenting on animals has been a very controversial matter for the last few decades and a lot of people had many arguments about this topic, a statistic has been made and it was found that more than 15 million animals are used in experiments, 90% of the United States animals are used in laboratories, 12 million are used in Europe, till now people haven’t reach a solution to this matter yet. Some people agree with experimenting on animals for scientific and medication reasons while other people disagree with it for religious and ethical reasons.
Animals are just pets that you could raise at home, animals are used in scientific researches to help in making and developing medicines and it has been a great success since nearly every medical …show more content…

animal rights means that animals deserve to be treated like humans, certain kinds of consideration of what is in their best interests, regardless of whether they are “cute” useful to humans, or an endangered species and regardless of whether any human cares about them at all, scientist has discovered that researches on animals often yield irrelevant and uncertain result therefore we can’t depend our lives on animal researches and testing, in addition, animals that are used in experiments are commonly subjected to force, feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, so imagine your self being tortured and submitted to force for no reason but to develop new medicines to others, it’s very cruel isn’t it? So why do you give this right to yourself and prevent animals from their rights? According to Lindsay Marshall in his article “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?” he shows that “the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits, 33,652 guinea pigs, and 48,015

Show More
Related
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, some major ethical issues with animal testing is that animals are often forced to suffer diseases, injuries, and live in isolated cages awaiting death by the end of the study; but, even though researchers try to reduce the pain, “they aren’t able to completely prevent any pain from occurring” since animals are living beings. Animals experience a considerable amount of pain and are subjected to all kinds of suffering including testing as awful as forced diseases, injuries, and enduring a life of isolated captivity. However, when the scientist no longer needs the animal, the animal is put to sleep without any thought about the animal’s life or purpose; so, this poor treatment of animals is morally wrong because animals live and breathe just as humans do and should be treated with more respect. Because much of medical research has nothing to do with animal testing, there seems no reason to continue this kind of animal abuse for animal testing is obviously not the core of medical progressions. Also, alternatives in the medical field are being made to replace animal testing, so animals no longer have to deal with the torture they have been subjected to, and these alternatives will most likely advance the medical field more than animal testing has advanced the medical field.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Since the emergence of bio medicine, animal testing has been a focal point of controversy. Those opposed to the use of animals in scientific studies believe that it is important for humans to treat all living things with the same respect. Animal rights activists make the argument that we should not do anything to a piglet for example, that we would not want done to our own infants. In spite of these points, animal testing is a crucial part of advancing biology, medicine and the overall welfare of human life. It is justified for scientists to have a more invasive form of research ethics towards animals as opposed to humans as the benefits far outweigh the consequences.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

This passage shows us that animals rights need to be taken into consideration before we derive them of their basic rights. Animals should be allowed rights, especially when they are being cruelly tested for things that don’t even benefit humans. The Royal Journal of Medicine clarifies this, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses”( the royal journal of medicine). Animal testing for useful information is a bad thing in itself; however, cruelly testing animals for just one's own curiosity is unacceptable. This information supports why animals need rights, so they don’t have to be put through such cruel

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

Scientists do not give compassion to these animals or care about how they feel they just use them for testing on. By forcing these animal to do experiments when they can't even fight back or argue against what is happening to them, it should be made illegal. Another example of how animal research should not be legal is in a an article about animal testing being bad science it talks about how during animal research animals are put in situations that aren't natural. They are given anxiety and fear inducing diseases that they would never normally have (“Animal Testing Is Bad Science”). These animals are forced to suffer through diseases that they never would have gotten in the wild.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Testing is it right or wrong Animals have been used for experiments in order to find more information on the human anatomy and how humans biological structures react to certain variable. Animals can be used in various forms experiments like dissection, trials, and other factors that animalś bodies may react to. Humans reason to test on animals is that they have similar genetic coding, and can be used for medical research to develop new medical practices or to learn more about conditions and diseases that affect the human body. There had been conflicts since the beginning of animal experimentation whether it is right to use animals in experiments or if it is wrong in moral standards. This is a very difficult topic to discuss based

Read More
1809 Words | 8 Pages

Animal Testing Imagine being trapped in a cage for weeks, years, or even your entire life. You can barely move. You have no control or say to what happens in your life. You can’t choose when you eat, what you wear, what you drink or where you go. A life like that sounds tortuous, no one wants to live like that.

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed or experimented on by scientists. Experimenting on animals not only affects the animal, but humans as well. While testing is important for finding cures for many different diseases, the amount of living organisms killed during experiments is avoidable. Animal testing is a world-wide issue, and serious measures must be placed by removing all animals from a laboratory setting and banning testing throughout the United States. Using animals to test the safety of products is used throughout the whole world.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Testing The human race has long history of experimentation on animals, specifically in the cosmetic and medical professions. There are plenty of people who put up a fight saying that the human race would not be where it is today without animal experimentation. It can be argued that animal testing has been useful, after all the debate could be made that such a method is not always used. With the advancements in the medical and scientific field, animal experimentation is no longer a practical practice.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Experimentation is ethical There has been an ongoing debate whether animal experimentation is ethical and should be allowed. While many people disagree with it because they claim that it is ethically wrong to experiment on animal, many people disagree and think it should continue to be allowed. Those who favor animal experimentation argue that the benefits outweigh the negatives. Animal testing has led to a significant increase in medical discoveries and has saved millions of lives.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

Many people own animals and they’ve created a love bond that is similar in having a child. I strongly believe that animals shouldn’t be used for research because it is inhumane. First, animal testing has both pros and cons. In the article “No animals don’t have rights,” the author Damon Linker discusses how animals shouldn’t have legal rights because humans aren’t supposed to interact with an animal. The New York article explains that an animal does not have the ability to be taken care of as if it were a person.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

In 2012, cardiovascular diseases alone killed 17.5 million people. If such diseases are capable of killing this amount of lives, how do our kind survive? Humans have no distinct qualities that they could use in nature. The only redeeming quality they have is their complex brains. Throughout history, starting from the homo sapiens during the Stone Age, humans have survive through the tools they create.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

“ Mice are mice, and people are people. If we look to the mouse to model every aspect of the disease for man and to model cures, we’re just wasting time(Barry).” For example animal testing doesn't always work. 90 percent of the medications that are approved for human use after animal testing later they will provide infective or harmful on humans test. In that case animal testing should be banned its not right to use all the chemical on animals for humans safety.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

The argument over animal experimentation is one of that battles between extremes in human nature. There are those that will argue that animal experimentation is cruel and unnecessary, and others who argue that animal experimentation is key to advancing modern medicine, technology, and medical procedures. In reality, there are laws, rules, and regulations over animal experimentation that ensure the safety and comfort of the animals that are being experimented over. There are also - despite these efforts - researchers who mistreat animals and experiment on them in cruel ways. Because of human nature, there will always be those who follow the rules exactly and those that deliberately break them.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year, millions of animals were suffering or killed due to scientific research. Some animal rights groups suggest that we should ban animal experiments because use animals for experimentation is cruel and animals should have the same right of living as human beings. A report from U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. There are some other people believe that the death of animals will help and save millions of human lives. Personally I believe that the experimentation on animals for scientific and medical should not be stopped.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document