ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

1449 Words6 Pages

Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed or experimented on by scientists. Experimenting on animals not only affects the animal, but humans as well. While testing is important for finding cures for many different diseases, the amount of living organisms killed during experiments is avoidable. Animal testing is a world-wide issue, and serious measures must be placed by removing all animals from a laboratory setting and banning testing throughout the United States. Using animals to test the safety of products is used throughout the whole world. During a procedure, there are many different people involved, including the animal, doctors, researchers, scientists, and experimenters. The top two industries that use animals to test …show more content…

They request abolishment of the use of animals in labs or treatment that is fair to the animals. Some countries including the European Union, India, and Israel have banned animal testing but the United States is not one to join them. Recently, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) decided that research involving chimpanzees was unnecessary, and came to the decision of banning the use of chimps in labs. Also, a bill proposed in 2016 aimed to reduce the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other chemical firms use of animals to test products (Brulliard 3). Next, the Animal Welfare Act sets standards for housing, transportation, and the handling of animals. The only problem with this act is that it allows an animal to be poisoned, shocked, burned, starved, restrained, brain damaged, and addicted to drugs. Scientists have the right to perform any experiment they want no matter how painful it is and no pain killers are required. When there is an alternative procedure available, the law does not require those alternatives to be …show more content…

Scientists and inventors can develop technology that can replace the use of animals in research labs. The Animal Cruelty Act also needs to be changed because it allows scientists to perform any type of medical procedure no matter how painful or controversial it will be. Also, there needs to be a national law that prohibits anybody from performing a medical surgery in which the animal is destined to be euthanised afterwards. Surprisingly, humans can make a difference too. By informing other people about animal testing, more people will gain the knowledge about what actually happens, persuading them to join the fight to end animal

Show More
Related

Anti Animal Testing Satire

1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More

Examples Of Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

688 Words | 3 Pages

Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in US. Labs every year. These animals don't have anyone to help them, they don't have anyone fighting for them. They need our help to end Animal Testing. Animal testing is a cruel act and should be ended for a plethora of reasons, one being that it is inhumane to do such things to any type of animal.

Read More

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

1603 Words | 7 Pages

Scientists do not give compassion to these animals or care about how they feel they just use them for testing on. By forcing these animal to do experiments when they can't even fight back or argue against what is happening to them, it should be made illegal. Another example of how animal research should not be legal is in a an article about animal testing being bad science it talks about how during animal research animals are put in situations that aren't natural. They are given anxiety and fear inducing diseases that they would never normally have (“Animal Testing Is Bad Science”). These animals are forced to suffer through diseases that they never would have gotten in the wild.

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Experimentation

857 Words | 4 Pages

Approximately 95 percent of the millions of animals used in experiments are mice and rats, with the remaining 5 percent comprised mostly of dogs, cats, guinea pigs, rabbits, birds, and non-human primates (chimpanzees, baboons, monkeys, and macaques). Most people in this world think that animal testing is okay, but actually it could be very harmful and deadly for the creatures. Experimenting on animals could lead to that species being endangered. This problem could be solved if scientist experimented on different objects or organisms that would not affect animals and their lives. Animals should not be used for medical and product research because it is cruel, some of the research cannot be transferred to humans, and there are other testing methods

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Testing

566 Words | 3 Pages

The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past few decades. There are many reasons why animals are tested on. For example, in some cases, animal testing is done purely for cosmetic and superficial purposes. However, testing on animals can also lead to the advancement of our scientific understanding. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease.

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Testing

615 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing can be defined as the use of non-humans i.e. animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. Only a small proportion of countries collect and publish data concerning their use of animals for testing and research, but it is estimated that more than 115 million animals are used and/or killed in laboratory experiments each year around the world. These animals cannot voice their concerns and we have the responsibility to fight for those who cannot speak for themselves. It can therefore be said that animal testing is not justified. This can be proven through the testing on animals being inhumane, alternative testing methods can be made use of, and animals differ in many ways and cannot be reliable test subjects, the drugs which pass these tests may not be safe for humans, may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments, 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act, tests on animals are very expensive, animal abuse is very prevalent in laboratories, and medical breakthroughs can be

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

1825 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Over 100 million animals are killed during experimentation for medical purposes each year, in the US alone. (PETA 2018). The animals killed for the purpose of animals are not merely mice and rabbits, but can even by cats and dogs that many consider to be loyal pets. Animal testing is used to test the safety and effectiveness of millions of drugs around the world.

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Testing

1470 Words | 6 Pages

millions of animal fall victim to the animal testing and torture . Some will also argue that it advances medical cures but if that is so why do 94 percent out off the Million off animal test do not have an effect on medical results (animal-testing.procon.org). Animal testing as little tow effect on research her for drugs because they do not give reliable results . Also some say that Animal research is regulated but if that is so the laws in place are flawed and many animals are still abused in labs with no punishment for the lab. The laws that are in place are flawed letting many case of animal abuse appear in labs.

Read More

Animal Testing Research Paper

1139 Words | 5 Pages

Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries

Read More

Animal Testing: The Humane Thing To Do

2310 Words | 10 Pages

The ethical advantages of human based testing is not a divisive topic; there are no animals involuntarily harmed through human based testing and all human test subjects that are used in scientific research are volunteers. However, the Animal welfare act provides very minimal protection for animals and it is the only law that is in place to protect animals undergoing scientific experiments ("Harm and Suffering"). In animal testing, animals that are used in scientific experiments are subject to being injected with disease, poisoned to test toxicity, undergoing electric shock, repeated breeding, high levels of stress, etc. To replace the use of such brutal testing methods, labs are switching to more humane forms of testing. For example, CeeTox is a lab that employs human based testing methods to test cosmetics and other potentially dangerous chemicals.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

360 Words | 2 Pages

It is often claimed that many experiments on animals are painless, and that it is extremely important to making new medical discoveries. Some will argue the animal Welfare Act and the Public Health service policy on animals being tested require researchers to keep the animals away from fear unless it affects their research (“Is Research Painful?”). Another common argument is every major medical advancement is attributable to experiments on animals (“Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint”). While it is true that the Animal Welfare act is supposed to protect animals, that doesn’t mean the act fully protects them. Also, experimenting on animals is nowhere as effective as researching on humans has been.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More

Persuasive Essay: Should We Use Animals For Scientific Testing

1013 Words | 5 Pages

In order to improve the lives of millions of people from around the world, scientists need to eradicate animal testing and new, more effective methods need to be put in

Read More

Why Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned

796 Words | 4 Pages

The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) of United States gives some protections to warm-blooded animals used in research laboratories, which only cover 5% of animals normally used for testing. Under AWA, all testing on animals which are covered must minimized the pain on animals and provide appropriate veterinary care. The AWA should make further improvements which cover as much animals as possible. In UK, the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 defined regulated procedures as animal experiments that could potentially cause "pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm”. It prevents animals from unnecessary suffering.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document