Aristotle Vs Immanuel Kant

The topic of ethics has been a subject of debate for centuries, with different philosophers proposing various theories and principles to guide ethical decision making. Aristotle and Immanuel Kant are among the most influential philosophers in the field of ethics, each with a unique perspective on the nature of morality and what constitutes a good life. In this paper I will discuss the chosen topic of comparing the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of these positions? Why? I have chosen this option to further explore and thoroughly explain the strengths and weaknesses of both Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. Aristotle was a scholar in disciplines such as ethics, metaphysics, biology,

often referred to as the ethics of duty, places emphasis on intentions behind actions. Kant is the central figure in modern philosophy. He created early modern rationalism and empiricism, set the way for much of nineteenth and twentieth century philosophy, and continues to have an effect on modern philosophy. He argues that moral worth lies in acting out of a sense of duty, guided by rationality and universal moral laws. Kant proposes the categorical imperative, a principle that requires individuals to act according to maxims that could be universally applied without contradiction. This universalizability of maxims ensures the moral worth of an

Personally, I tend to agree with Aristotle, Aristotle's approach recognizes the importance of personal growth and moral development, allowing us to continually strive for excellence in our lives. Virtue ethics acknowledges the importance of individual situations and moral decisions may vary based on cultural and situational factors. While Kant's deontological ethics has its positives, such as focusing on universal principles and respect for humans, I find its strict calling to duty and rationality to be limiting. The deontological approach may overlook the diversity of moral situations, potentially leaving out many cultures. While both philosophers have greatly impacted philosophy throughout the centuries and remain some of the cornerstones in modern philosophy, I still lean more towards Aristotle even though Kant has had more of an impact on our basic morale and ethical views such as; Don’t steal or Don’t cheat. To conclude, both offering a separate perspective on the nature of morality and what constitutes a good life. This paper was to dive into their ethical theories, examining their similarities and differences, as well as their strengths and