ipl-logo

Assignment 1: Understanding Ideology

791 Words4 Pages

Ms. Baird CPW4UO-01 Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Understanding Ideology Society is complex and filled with many different opinions on political issues they may change as different circumstances occur each day. The environment around us has a powerful influence on the decisions that we produce and the views that we as Canadians decide to believe in. I have always been interested in politics and have what political ideology I belong to now I am in this class I was able to discover through the quiz that I'm Libertarian Right which equals Conservative on the political. According to the textbook “Conservatives believe that traditional values are the building blocks of society and are worth preserving because they have held society together. …show more content…

I believe that my family members influence my political ideology. I believe anyone my age would be lying if they said that their parents didn’t have any sort of influence on their political ideologies and mine certainly did. However to understand ideology we must understand we may not agree with every policy that your party agrees with. My family is Colombian and very conservative and I guess that rubbed off on me. However one conservative principal I do not agree with is on the issue abortion. My top and one of my only liberal beliefs is that I am pro-choice. I’d say something that separates me from being very conservative is my belief in division between of what religion says and someone's own choices especially one it comes to the difficult decision of having a child or not. In Colombia the concept of abortion would not sit well with people as they believe in the true conservative ideology that terminating an unborn child is against god's will. My beliefs on abortion demonstrate that Society is complex and filled with many different …show more content…

According to the (CBC) “The federal government is scrapping measures brought in by the Conservatives that allow Ottawa to revoke the citizenship of Canadians convicted of terrorism and other offences” (Parry, Tom, 2016). I think this is absurd as we should not allow convicted terrorists to retain citizenship in Canada. Those who break the law in Canada do not have the same rights as those who obey the law. I'm Libertarian Right and agree with the concepts of smaller government and privatization but I draw the line when it comes to terrorism. The liberals believe that everyone should be Canadian and yes includes terrorists. My personal ideology is we should not follow this policy because it will create a negative to the Canadian identity and this should have never been introduced in the first place as people who intend to commit crimes should not be treated equally as law abiding ones. Another reason why I am Libertarian Right and agree with the Conservatives is because the party wants to lower taxes. According to the Conservatives. “Building on past support, a re-elected Harper Government will deliver on its plan to further lower the small business tax rate from 11 percent to 9 percent over the next four

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Bill C-51

294 Words | 2 Pages

Bill C-51 has been amongst the Bills that have been debated, questioned and stirred confusion for most Canadians. It was originally proposed by the Harper government only later to be adopted. In the recent Canadian elections of 2015, the liberal party expressed its concerns over the Bill and promised its people that if they come to power, the Bill will be looked upon. During their campaign the amendment of Bill C-51 was one of their major promises as they recognized the security and freedom of Canadian Rights as well as rights for the immigrants. The Bill has been controversial primarily because it is considered vague and abrupt as well as giving police forces power that may be too dangerous.

Read More

Why Is The War Measures Act Justified In The October Crisis

1241 Words | 5 Pages

With a state of insurrection in Canada caused by the infamous terrorist group, the Front de Liberation du Québec (FLQ), it is believed that the invocation of the War Measures Act during the October Crisis of 1970 was justified. In 1970, Canada was in a state of apprehended insurgence attributable to the acts of the notorious Quebec terrorists known as the FLQ. From 1963 to 1969, the ethnically delimited terrorists fought tirelessly to create a revolution and instigate public hate crime within Canada, however the groups most climactic incident was the kidnapping of British diplomat James Cross and Quebec Minister of Labour, Pierre Laporte in the October Crisis of 1970 (Torrance, J., 1988). Both men were captured at gunpoint, whilst authorities received a list of ransom demands to be filled in exchange for the lives of the hostages. With political upheaval, public resistance and immense fear in a state of proclaimed ‘apprehended insurrection’, on October 16 1970, the formidable War Measures Act was invoked by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to eliminate all FLQ members and supporters (Bélanger, C., 2000).

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Bill C-51

1693 Words | 7 Pages

Citizens of Canada could be detained before they have done anything to thwart national security. This was created to prevent ‘extremists’ from committing any dangerous, or damaging act, though this enforces a reverse onus, a violation of Section 11 (b) of the Charter. Citizens will also have their rights limited on the grounds they ‘might’ commit a certain offence, though there is no mention of what constitutes reasonable proof of this, and is hence arbitrary. Giving CSIS these new powers could easily end in the encroachment of the rights of innocent citizens, despite potentially protecting the state. This legislation will indefinitely result in a power imbalance between citizens and the government.

Read More

Why Is The War Measures Act Justified

1367 Words | 6 Pages

The War Measures Act was declared for the third time in Canadian history (but for the first time for domestic use in the country) for the October Crisis in 1970. The terrorist group Front de Libération du Québec (FLQ) kidnapped the British trade commissioner James Cross and The Quebec Labour Minister, Pierre Laporte and the group also murdered Pierre Laporte. This crisis shocked everyone and it led to the command of the War Measures Act. Pierre Trudeau’s decision to pass the War Measures Act was a very necessary and a strong step due to the acts of terrorism. I agree that his decision was right and the act was justified because of three reasons which are that the act dealt with the greatest terrorist attack in Canadian history, the majority

Read More

Comparison Between Stephen Harper's Foreign Policy And Security

366 Words | 2 Pages

Stephen Harper wants to give small businesses a tax rate cut from 11% to 9%. When the discussion for Foreign Policy and Security started, he stated that he would like to go to war with ISIS. Harper stayed strong with his beliefs and explained how Canada had the strongest economic growth since the 2008 recession. However, he mostly defended himself at the debate while the other leaders tried to attack him on his economic history. Justin Trudeau blamed Harper on giving tax cuts to the wealthiest and NDP candidate and Thomas Mulcair accused Harper of allowing Canada to lose 400,000 well-payed jobs.

Read More

How Did Pierre Trudeau Changed Canada?

1421 Words | 6 Pages

Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.

Read More

Assess The Reasons Why The Conservatives Lose Power

876 Words | 4 Pages

“Trudeaumania swept across Canada…for a few warm spring months in 1968 Pierre Elliot Trudeau synthesized the dreams, achievements, and illusions of the liberation era.” (Fellows and Wells, 2013). Trudeau ran under the slogan of creating “the Just Society” (Fellows and Wells, 2013) in Canada, and unlike Diefenbaker, Trudeau would manage to achieve what he promised the public. While Trudeau was in office he managed to implement reforms that expanded welfare, enabled parliament to be more efficient, and established true universal healthcare in Canada (Fellows and Wells, 2013) . All of these changes and reform were things that others had promised previous to Trudeau but constantly failed to

Read More

Essay Why Conservatives Can T Understand Liberals

633 Words | 3 Pages

While Conservatives focus primarily on individual human recognition and unconditional duty towards the nation, the liberals give importance to the government’s duty towards the people and principles. Consequently, as the radically opposite ideologies crashed, a ruckus is inevitable. The primary problem that is preventing both the advocates from understanding the ‘other side’ is the existence of a feeling of superiority and disregard towards each other’s aspects. The conservatives cannot understand why immigrants and minorities must have an equal share in their nation’s resources, while the liberals smirk at the conservatives’ traditional values and their focus upon nationalistic

Read More

October Crisis Analysis

1774 Words | 8 Pages

Greatly valued in the west, Canada is proud to have a set of rights and freedoms granted to every one of its citizens. Under the Canadian Charter Rights and Freedoms, it dictates what the state’s citizens are entitled to, which can involve the right to expression and the right to equality. Of course, there are reasonable limitations to these rights, such as restricting what sort of speech is free, but since the September 9, 2011 attack in New York City (hereby referenced as 9/11), the Canadian government has been passing legislature that has been cracking down hard on these rights. These legislatures, such as Bill C-36, has been created specifically to fight off terrorism, but this fight has been done almost blindly and in a rash manner. Cases

Read More

Aucoin's Democratic Reform In Canada

1010 Words | 5 Pages

Aucoin Essay Our new prime minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau has given a set of democratic reforms to minister LeBlanc who has been given the task to deal with the problems regarding parliament issues. Our prime minister has promised Canadians real change to the way the government governs by committing to invest in Canada’s growing economy, to strengthen the middle-class, to help the hard working class, to provide help to those whom need it most compared to those who do not need it, and to invest in the public to create jobs, economic growth and a broad-based expansion. Aucoin’s democratic reform proposal tests for good reforms that include clear objectives, no loopholes, clear enforcement mechanism, entrench the house of commons power, fixed

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Closed Border Libertarianism

1473 Words | 6 Pages

The Paris terrorist attacks have caused a rift in the libertarian community. To the surprise of many, some libertarians advocate for a closed border policy. I was in shock too when I first heard of this position considering that libertarianism is about natural rights, and what more basic right is there than movement? This debate is extremely complicated, and it is unfortunate many fail to see this the complications. Ask any run-of-the-mill libertarian on the street about the debate and they will claim there are two sides: the open border libertarians, i.e. the true and consistent libertarians, and the closed border libertarians, i.e. reactionaries who either use utilitarianism or are changing up libertarian principles to make them fit what

Read More

How Has The Criminal Code Changed Throughout The 1960's

1155 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the 1960’s, Pierre Trudeau made many significant changes regarding Canada’s Criminal Code through Bill C-150, after earning a seat in parliament for the Liberals in 1965. This bill took major steps towards the acceptance of homosexuality, made abortion possible for some women, put restrictions on firearms, made small scale gambling okay and put a limit on Blood Alcohol Concentration when driving. Before the late 1960's, there was a strong stigma around abortion and homosexuality, he started to change our country’s opinion on this as well as some other topics. Pierre was one of the people who began proving everyone was equal and began giving rights to those who otherwise had none. He created the basis of what our criminal code

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

Some Canadians believe that we should abolish it. Others could

Read More

Essay On Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

702 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was set in place in 1982? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is set in place to help protect the individual rights of Canadians. Within the Charter, Canadian citizens have many rights and freedoms, for example, the right to express their opinion, vote, move freely around Canada and to be free from discrimination. If the government enacts legislation to refute these rights and freedoms, as Canadians, we are able to take the issue to the Supreme Court of Canada to fight for our rights. Democratic rights give you the right to vote for members of the House of Commons and the provincial legislature.

Read More

Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

1027 Words | 5 Pages

It can be hard to find your political view. Sometimes it takes time and research on political issues in our country and around the world. There are two popular political views; conservative and liberal. The definition for a conservative; is holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Liberal definition is; open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.

Read More

More about Assignment 1: Understanding Ideology

Related Topics

Open Document