Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare sparta with athens
Compare sparta with athens
Compare sparta with athens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare sparta with athens
Compare sparta with athens
Compare sparta with athens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Athens used a form of government called a Democracy, ruled by the people. Since the people of Athens may have different opinions, leading to arguments fights and making family go against family in their own homeland. Yet, Sparta was ruled by few people so the Spartans could avoid all the tension. Therefore, oligarchy was the best form of government for the Spartans. Furthermore, Sparta was focused on their military.
Even to this day, we still use Athens and Sparta’s societal systems and structures because they were so revolutionary. Athens even introduced the idea of democracy, and Sparta had a strong military culture. Although Athens and Sparta were close together, Athens focused on leadership and education while Sparta focused on the military and war. However, due to their different governments and cultures, each has their strengths and weaknesses. However, because Athens focuses on its future leaders, Athens is the better model for a society.
In conclusion, Sparta and Athens were two of the most significant city-states in ancient Greece, both having distinctive political structures that reflected the oligarchic and military nature of Sparta and the democratic ideals of Athens. In spite of their differences, they both offer insightful perspectives on the evolution of democratic government in Western civilization.
Ancient Greece, a thriving country consisting of nearly 100 city states from within. A gem of the Archaic and Classical Greek Era that we have come to discover. While the country thrived, they also had much tension from within caused by its two leading cities, Athens and Sparta. Athens, a democratic and well invested political city found apprehension with their neighboring municipality Sparta, a highly dense military society. Though the two cities shared several traits such as slavery and gradation systeming, they were separated by their political and economic differences.
.Introduction Athens and Sparta were two major city-states in old Greek. We review their governance and compare them for their similarities and differences. How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community?
The Athenians developed a democracy. This was a direct democracy, which means the Athens would vote directly on issues. Most city-states were tyrannies at this time. Cleisthenes was the first Athenian to come up with this concept of government. The political side of Athens is a big selling point.
The Government of Athens wasn’t known to be the best one. Compared to Oligarchy, the Athenian democracy is a poor form of government. Athenian democracy is considered weak and is run by weak-minded people. Mostly lethargic and incompetent people are brought to the power saying that they all have equal rights. It becomes an issue in democracy when we need someone strong willed to lead the rest of the people in the society.
Currently there is a great debate happening about Athens and Sparta. Some people believe that Athens is a better city state. After examining both positions, it is a evident that Sparta is better than Athens, because Sparta had a more efficient education, government and economy. Spartans oligarchy surpassed the Athenians government in many ways.
In Ancient Greece, there was diversity not only of the people, but of government structures and styles. The following paragraphs will follow some of that diversity, specifically between the city states of Athens and Sparta regarding their governmental structure. First, some people in Athens and Sparta obtained the right to participate in public life and made decision that would affect their community. Some held public office, and some did not.
Today, many of the world’s government structures were based on the principle of one of Greece’s city-states. Greece became a country advancing well before its time, strong in both military and brain power. This country was able to produce two city-states that became foundations to advancing the rest of the world. The first city-state, Athens, is thought to be the first to implement a democratic government while Sparta became known for their military power. While Athens and Sparta provide the world with advancements they differ in the ways of government structures, social motivations, and cultural differences.
Athens and Sparta, two of the ancient Greek city-states, are renowned for having distinctive and distinctive administrative systems. Although certain similarities between them, their approaches to governing were very different. This essay will look at who held public office, the criteria used to choose those candidates, how the two city-states' administrative institutions varied and compared, and how citizens in Athens and Sparta earned the right to participate in public life and make decisions that affected the community. In Athens, all free adult male citizens were allowed to participate in the political process.
The Government Structures of Athens and Sparta Athens and Sparta were two large and well-known poleis among hundreds of poleis in ancient Greece at the time of the archaic and classical periods (Brand, 2010). Since those periods, they had different reputations of their own such as Athens for its establishment of the first democratic government and Sparta for its military. Although they were poleis under the name of Ancient Greece, their focus and priorities were different and so did their governmental systems. The right to participate in public life and decision-making in Athens and Sparta was based on citizenship and wealth.
To an extant, their governments never really achieved the idea of all are equal before the law. Apart from these parallels, they have many differences, for instance, Athens was heading towards ‘one man one vote’ which reflects its social progress and its right direction in becoming a democratic state. However, “The Sparta system combined elements of apartheid, oligarchy, monarchy, militarism, terroistic secret police…and democracy all
Compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. University of the People Student X Written assignment unit 2 Compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. 1 Compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. Introduction Before all let define democracy, so it is defined as a type of government where people exert the sovereignty.
Democracy, a form of government, allows the people in their own nationality to vote for people in order for them to become representatives as a result to vote on new laws that would affect their own nationality. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not inclusive, other than male citizens, to gain authority in ancient Athens, ¨Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners(Metics) and slaves.¨(Document D), therefore ruling Athens was only accessible to male citizen since since women, free foreigners(Metics), and slaves were not allowed to rule as a result of not being male citizens. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens, was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not even using the essentials of democracy that is used today, “Thus, by our standards, it was oligarchy, not democracy.¨(Document D), therefore ancient Athens was not using democracy as their form of government, they were using oligarchy,another form of government in which a small group of people has power and control, as their form of government instead of democracy.