ipl-logo

Atomic Bomb Decision Essay

488 Words2 Pages

On August 6, 1945, President Harry S. Truman made the decision to drop the two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although most of the United States agreed with Harry S. Truman and his decision to drop the two atomic bombs, some people still disagreed. People argued that it was inhumane. Overall, the United State’s decision to drop the two atomic bombs was the correct decision and was not immoral.
One of the reasons President Truman’s descision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan was appropriate is because the war might of countinued further. The Japanese were ordered to fight to the death by their emporer, Hirihito. If the bombs were not dropped, more deaths between the Axis Powers and the Allies would have occured. The bombs caused the Japanese to surrender, which put an end to their relentless fighting. Also, if the U.S. had chose to invade Japan instead of bomb them, it would’ve resulted in mass amounts of death for America. If these deaths would’ve occured, it could’ve hindered America and their ability to fight in greatly.
Furthermore, the dropping of bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not immoral. …show more content…

The amount of people killed during the war is more than 10x the amount killed because of the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also, death is just a part of war,these deaths, and possibly more would have been caused, even if the United States did not drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To continue, atomic bombs were new technology during this time and the use of them showed the world how destructive and deadly these bombs can really be.The droppings of the bombs on Japan could have prevented more nuclear warfare from

Show More
Related

To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More

Should The Us Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

616 Words | 3 Pages

If the U.S. did not use the atomic bomb, the war could have killed more American soldiers because Japanese soldiers fought to the death. “The U.S. had sustained more than 75,000 casualties.” (Historical Background). The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was just retaliation for Japan's bombing of Pearl Harbor. The bombing was not really about saving lives.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

735 Words | 3 Pages

Nagasaki was a strategic place to drop the bomb because of the torpedo plant, but Hiroshima only had a military base, so why drop on Hiroshima? Therefore, was the United States’ decision ethical and fair to the

Read More

Truman Should Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

332 Words | 2 Pages

In August of 1945 Truman had to make a huge decision, this was whether to drop the atomic bomb or not to. Truman ultimately decided in the end to drop the bomb on Nagasaki on August 6th, 1945. Truman should have dropped the Atom bomb because it ended a bloody war and began an era of peace for the world, and because a land invasion of Japan would have resulted in countless American deaths. Dropping the bomb ended an insanely bloody war. More than 70 million people were killed during World War 2, and invading Japan would have caused even more people to die (Fallen).

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

538 Words | 3 Pages

Both atomic bombs killed around 200 000 people and completely destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the images of the destruction show clearly how devastating was for the people and houses ( document 8). “ how can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose and instrument of destruction” (document 4), even though this decision was made by the president Truman and as he says in Harry Truman Memoirs; the scientific advisers of the committee reported, “ We can propose no technical demonstration likely to bring an end to the war: we see no acceptable alternative to direct military use”, but this brings us to the second reason: Japan was a defeated nation, Japan’s cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing, the soviet union “betrayed” them and entered the war by attacking Japan in Manchuria, and the American Navy blockaded Japan’s home island (document 7). After both atomic bombs, the emperor of Japan declared Japan’s unconditional surrender manifesting that the soviet union and the technology were something that Japan could not compete with ( document 14). Adding to these, a third reason to question America’s decision is that Document 7 says that the bomb was used to justify the money spend on

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

567 Words | 3 Pages

Truman was the president of the United States at the time, so its obvious why he choose to drop the bomb. It would save more American lives this way. “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and did not use it and let a million more people die” (Doc L). If he didn’t drop it, about 400,000 to 800,000 American lives would have been lost (OI). If Japan couldn’t make war, there wouldn’t be war.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words | 3 Pages

The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq

513 Words | 3 Pages

If the atomic bomb were not dropped the war would have lasted longer, ending in more lives lost and wasted materials. Another reason that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified is, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with pearl harbor, They had it coming with damage done to them. “A Kamikaze Pilot's Manual” (Document #9) In the three pictures you can see the horrifying pearl harbor attack summed up in only 3 images, before, during, and the aftermath.

Read More

Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

808 Words | 4 Pages

It was terrible to send these bombs; it was the deadliest weapon of war. However, it was certainly justified. Could we have said Japan wouldn’t have done the same to the US? We have seen them bomb us where it mattered the most on December 7th, 1941.  It is proven in Document 12, a speech from President Truman, that Japan deserved what was coming for them.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

927 Words | 4 Pages

If the United States never dropped the atomic bomb then soldiers would have had to invade Japan which would result in a large number of casualties. “I have been convinced that we saved more lives than we took. It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and not used it and let a million more people die”(Source 8). Due to the Japanese bushido mentality, they were never going to surrender, and they would fight until the last man was standing. “The Japanese had demonstrated near-fanatical resistance, fighting to almost the last man on Pacific islands, committing mass suicide on Saipan, and unleashing kamikaze attacks at Okinawa”(Source 11).

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More

Should The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Essay

1134 Words | 5 Pages

Should the United States Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb? On August 6, 1945, a B-29 Superfortress, Enola Gay, dropped an experimental bomb called Little Boy on Hiroshima. Three days later, the United States dropped another nuclear bomb on Nagasaki. The effects of these atomic bombs devasted Japan and forced a surrender from them ending World War 2.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

954 Words | 4 Pages

Thankfully Italy and Germany gave up in the war and it was just Japan left to fight against. Once we dropped the bombs things changed in a good way. When we dropped the bombs on Japan they surrendered and we did it, we won. If we didn’t drop the bomb the war would most likely continue and more lives would be taken away then the lives taken away when the atomic bombs were dropped. Even though many people were injured, dead, and or lost loved ones, the people knew it would

Read More

More about Atomic Bomb Decision Essay

Related Topics

Open Document