ipl-logo

Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima-The Public Explanation: A Comparison

482 Words2 Pages

The two stories, The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima- The Public Explanation and If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used are both about the bombing of Hiroshima. The difference is that one story discussed the public announcement of the atomic bomb and about the bombing. The other story focused on what would have happened if the bomb was not used and whether it was necessary or not. There is a similarity and difference in both stories and they both give great points of view.
The story, The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima- The Public Explanation is all about the decision making of dropping the bomb and giving a public explanation as to why. President Truman gave a public announcement on August 6, 1945 discussing the dropping of the atomic bomb. His message was directed towards the American people but also the military leaders in Japan. The story, If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used is similar to the other due to the main topic being discussed it the atomic bomb. Another similarity was that The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima- The Public Explanation clearly thought that the bombing was the best idea and that is why they did so. Then, in the story, If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used Truman thought that the bombing was the best decision because if the Americans would not have bombed then …show more content…

Such as what would have happened if the Americans did not bomb. Some thought it was the best choice while others thought it was not necessary. Either way it was done and it ended up being beneficial however; that story was used to show why people thought it was the best and why it could have not been used. Then, in The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima- The Public Explanation was solely focused on the reason why they did use atomic bomb. It did not give the opinions of others and whether they thought it was good or bad. It told us why they did so and end

Show More
Related

Another Holocaust In Elie Wiesel's 'Night'

296 Words | 2 Pages

This story was meant to stop another holocaust from happening and the world turning against one another and starting another war. If this book had not been writin and the other stories about the holocaust then the world might not be as it is right now. The world might be under war or it might be completely split up and everyone not caring about what is happening in the other countries and there being another holocaust. If there were other holocaust then the world would no longer be safe and there would be war everywhere.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq

556 Words | 3 Pages

The bomb had killed millions of innocent people, including women and children instead of strictly Japanese troops.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

630 Words | 3 Pages

With this bomb we have added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces. In their present form these bombs are now in production and even more powerful forms are in development.” (Truman 1) By educating the audience, the audience can understand and have more knowledge about why the dropping of the atomic bomb was necessary for society and other countries. By stating repetition and tone, Truman can back up his claim that the atomic bomb saved more lives and shortened the

Read More

New Historicism In Slaughterhouse-Five

1106 Words | 5 Pages

Slaughterhouse-Five focuses on several worldly tragedies and international events. The Dresden and Hiroshima bombings are specifically mentioned multiple times. However, it lacks the depth that would come with the addition of the oppressed groups’ point of views. The missing viewpoint is highlighted when it states, “Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima, an important Japanese Army base” (185). The atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima would be told in a much different way from the Japanese perspective.

Read More

Essay On Why The USould Not Use The Atomic Bomb

877 Words | 4 Pages

This is because they would not have to go through the pain and suffering that the bomb created for many people in Japan, just to meet their fate of death shortly after. It also did a lot of damage to Hiroshima itself, making it inhabitable for anyone, not just the ones who got hit by the initial blast of the bomb. This was unnecessary and did not help the US in their war against Japan because it killed innocent civilians in Japan, not the ones fighting for their military. Also, after the Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima, 48,000 buildings were destroyed, around 100,000 people died on the first day, and the death toll climbed to 140,000 by the end of the year. (World Court Hearing: Atomic

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper

1838 Words | 8 Pages

The atomic bomb made this justified because this made the long lasting war end and people knew they were going to survive and see their loved ones again. Soldiers have been exhausted physically and mentally thought the war and

Read More

Essay On Dresden Bombing

914 Words | 4 Pages

In some cases the government of the United States even asked news sources to not report on the bombing, knowing the devastating effects it would have on the morale of the American people. Although there are now more reliable facts regarding the

Read More

Were The Bombing Of Hiroshima Ethically Wrong Essay

1260 Words | 6 Pages

This is showing that Conant suggested that they should bomb two major cities with civilians to make it, “the most brutal and destructive way possible.” It was meant to show people the power of what America could do, which ruined life for almost 100 years and will continue after all of this current generation dies. “To Truman, the A-bomb was just another weapon to use. Under this interpretation, there are no justifiable grounds for the moral condemnation of killing about 200,000 Japanese in the two cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” (Yagami). This is an article about the bombings of 1945 before the ones August 6th and 9th.

Read More

Differences Between Macbeth And Throne Of Blood

830 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Bombing

592 Words | 3 Pages

Raids like the ones that happened over London took course over many days and British citizens had the chance to react and shelter. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were different, in an instant a city was wiped off the map with no time for reaction. Germany bombed British targets to also bait out the RAF in order to gain air superiority, Hiroshima and Nagasaki had little military targets and were civilian centers. The argument that the bombs aren't unique is a black and white view of bombing raids and their differing objectives and

Read More

The Atomic Bomb: The Decision To Drop The Bomb

310 Words | 2 Pages

The Decision to Drop the Bomb described to us decisions leading up to the ultimate dropping of two atomic bombs over Japan in a matter of days. It narrated various circumstances that occurred. One was the untimely death of President Roosevelt. President Truman took over with no information on the experiments and had to rely on his advisors and various committees. Individual agendas appeared to have played in the ultimate dropping of the bombs.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Bombing

725 Words | 3 Pages

The author John Berger (b. 1926) reinserted those events of August 6, 1945 back into living consciousness. His comments of nature of evil, horror and hell brought back most memories of the catastrophe, which made a dent in history forever. There are many reasons the bombing will never be forgotten, and the biases of people that approved or denied the occurrence made it harder for the government to decide whether to do it or not. First, all humans are the same, and we do not have the rights to take a life that was not given to us.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima-The Public Explanation: A Comparison

Related Topics

Open Document