ipl-logo

Atomic Decision Dbq

1362 Words6 Pages

Yash Patel Mr. Waters World History 10 March 2023 The Atomic Decision For the first time, the world had to hold its breath as a portion of humanity was annihilated instantly. On August 6 and 9, 1945, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively, causing unprecedented destruction and loss of life. The bombings ended World War II, but they also marked the beginning of the nuclear age and the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. Prior to the atomic bombings, the United States had been engaged in a bitter and protracted conflict with Japan, with casualties on both sides mounting steadily. A committee made up of then-President Truman and other advisors sought to end the …show more content…

As stated by Admiral William Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…" (Document #2). The Japanese forces were surrounded, suffering significant losses, and the United States troops were already at the border of the mainland. Therefore, the use of the atomic bomb was an unjustified flex by the United States, disregarding the human lives in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan was destined to fall, nevertheless, the US saw it necessary to drop an A-bomb. Moreover, the bomb was dropped unexpectedly and quickly: “It was [the committee’s] recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy as soon as it could be done. They recommended further that it should be used without specific warning... “ (Document 1). The advisors' recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy without specific warning provides evidence that the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was not solely based on the military necessity to force the Japanese to surrender. The recommendation to use the bomb without specific warning indicates that the United States was seeking to use the atomic bomb as a strategic and political tool to quickly end the war and demonstrate its technological …show more content…

Nuclear Weapons and the Escalation of the Cold War, 1945-1962. Edited by Melvyn P Leffler and Odd Arne Westad, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 376–397, history.stanford.edu/publications/nuclear-weapons-and-escalation-cold-war-1945-1962. Listwa, Dan. “Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Long Term Health Effects.” K=1 Project, 9 Aug. 2012, https://k1project.columbia.edu/news/hiroshima-and-nagasaki. “Manhattan Project: The Cold War, 1945-1990.” Www.osti.gov, www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/Events/1945-present/cold_war.htm#:~:text=Not%20only%20did%20the%20atomic. Accessed 10 Mar.

Show More
Related
791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

During the year of 1945, The United States possessed a lethal weapon with uncontrollable power over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Due to this unpredictable atomic bomb, World War II came to an end. Although the Atomic Bomb killed many lives, a countless amount of American lives were saved. Harry Truman was encouraged to drop the bomb because Japan didn’t follow through on the Potsdam Conference. Truman had many options to surrender Japan, which out of all the options he decided to drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan.

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

With roughly two weeks of formal experience as the leader of the nation during a very tumultuous time, President Truman had to devise a way to end the war in Japan. When it comes down to the justification for a decision as grand as this, one has to look at the facts and understand that Truman’s decision was definitely something he had to mull over in his mind for quite some time. The understanding truly comes from the fact that Truman was made aware of the Manhattan Project only two weeks after he became President, and told by his advisors that he must make a decision. World War II, at the time, had already began to show signs of ending; however, this was because of most of the Axis Powers had been dealt with, save Japan. Despite the United States’ plea for Japan to accept an unconditional surrender, the pure brutality and honor that they possessed never ceased to exist, even though many were aware of their ineluctable downfall.

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II serve as examples of the advancement of warfare technology the United States had made. However, the atomic bomb drop was unnecessary and simply used as a display of power by the Truman administration. Although the Japanese were certainly defeated and close to surrender Truman’s administration decided to drop the bombs in order to ensure that the United States was the sole victor of the war without relying on their Soviet allies. Truman was intolerant of communism and afraid that allowing Joseph Stalin have any influence during the war would spread communism. Therefore, Truman took the decision to drop the atomic bombs which then served as what historians call it “atomic

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

The United States decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was barely motivated by the idea that it would intimidate the Soviet Union. Dropping the atomic bomb was designed to demoralize the Japanese and demonstrate to them that if they did not surrender, th . In Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson’s memoirs in document A, he writes, “The total strength of the Japanese army was estimated at about 5,000,000... I was informed that such operation (the invasion of Japan) might be expected to cost over a million casualties, to American forces alone” (Doc A). Stimson’s memoirs were written with the intention of being published and he knew he had to defend the government’s decision to drop the bomb and is writing from the point of view of someone

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

He believed that the use of the atomic bomb was justified as a means to end the war quickly and demonstrate America's military power. Despite the arguments in favor of dropping the atomic bomb, there are strong counterclaims that challenge the decision. One of the most prominent voices against the use of the bomb was that of Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman. In his memoir, "I Was There," Leahy expressed his opposition to using the atomic bomb, stating, "It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender."

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

The Potsdam Ultimatum was also rejected by the conceited Japanese government officials because they didn’t want to have to surrender. Truman made the ultimate decision to save U.S. lives over the Japanese. The final supportive piece of evidence was that we had the necessary technology. Our Boeing B-29 fighter planes helped to drop the 5 ton atomic bombs, and evidently ended the war. To sum it up, the Japanese needed to be stopped, and from their past actions, the U.S. knew that they weren’t going to surrender on their own power.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Truman was the president of the United States at the time, so its obvious why he choose to drop the bomb. It would save more American lives this way. “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and did not use it and let a million more people die” (Doc L). If he didn’t drop it, about 400,000 to 800,000 American lives would have been lost (OI). If Japan couldn’t make war, there wouldn’t be war.

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War II remains one of the most controversial events in modern history. Three primary arguments regarding this decision are presented in “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer, “A Petition to the President of the United States” by Leo Szilard, and “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” by Henry Stimson. While each author presents a unique perspective, this essay argues that Oppenheimer’s argument is best supported by evidence and reasoning. The "Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists" is an effective text because he creates credibility as a scientist and leader, appeals to both reason and emotion, emphasizes the moral consequences of their job, and emphasizes the need for cooperation and responsibility.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

The war could easily end if the atomic bomb was dropped yet many innocent people would be killed. Truman had 2 other options to consider, he could send American troops to Japan but was at risk of many casualties. Truman's last option was to drop the bomb and give Japan a warning prior to using the bomb which is exactly what the president decided on. Although using the bomb brought the war to a quick end, not only did the U.S. not give a proper warning to Japan, but many innocent people died.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

On August 14th, 1945 the Japanese Emperor announced their surrender. “By the summer of 1945 the American military was exhausted, and the sheer number of troops needed for Operation Downfall meant that not only would the troops in the Pacific have to male one more landing, but even many of those troops whose valor and sacrifice had brought an end to the Nazi Third Reich were sent to be sent Pacific” (Atomic Bomb, 2023). The American military was weary and the war was getting long and costly. Dropping the bombs was a good solution for the military to get their men and country out of that position. Dropping the two atomic bombs was a military essential for helping shorten the war but also the Japanese were given warning of this

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

If ten Japanese soldiers were surrounded by hundred American soldiers, one would guess that Japanese would give up. However, this wasn't the case; Japanese soldiers would fight even if they were out numbered by hundreds and would try to kill as many Americans as possible. They were loyal to the Japanese code and that was to fight until the last breath no matter how lop sided the battle was. The atomic bomb seemed like the only choice Truman had to put and end to this war and save both American and Japanese lives. For Truman, the choice whether or not to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life and he was trying to find everything he could to make this action seem like it was for a good cause.

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

The use of nuclear weapons on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the Japanese Empire by the United States put a final end to World War II and made the planned invasion of the Japanese Empires homeland code named “Operation Downfall”. The decision to drop the bombs came from the United States President Truman. Truman made his decision based of the information he had at hand and the situation of the American people at home. He also had help making the decision from his advisers. Dropping the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved lives on both sides of the war.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

More about Atomic Decision Dbq

Open Document