More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Discrimination in the u.s justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
for a dull respondent than for a white prosecutor in a practically identical case. A study in California found that the people who killed whites were general 3 times more slanted to be sentenced to death than the people who killed blacks and more than 4 times more likely than the people who killed Latinos. Looks at exhibit that 96% of states where there have been surveys of race and capital punishment, there was an example of either race-of-casualty or race-of-litigant separation, or both. A respondent was a few times more prone to be sentenced to death if the homicide casualty was white. A January 2003 study discharged by the University of Maryland presumed that race and geology are central point in capital punishment choices.
Bringing attention to the unfair disparage-ridden system, it is known that racial minorities like African Americans or Latinos are condemned more than Caucasians hence the dispoportionate number of the innocent outweighing the number of those guilty of the crime. The correction of the oppressive imbalanced system leaves room for a new unbiased
In Leo R. Chavez’s ethnography, The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation, the claimed problem of Latino immigration, specifically Mexicans, is tackled using interviews, statistics, and other works of literature. Chavez’s ethnography not only discusses Latino immigration but Latino invasion, integration, organ transplants and even Latina fertilization. One of Chavez’s big topics is on how the media influences the public to believe that Latinos are planning an invasion or take-over in order to gain the land that was originally Mexico’s. The topic of Latina reproduction and fertilization comes up multiple times through Chavez’s ethnography. Another main topic that plays a part in Chavez’s argument is the Latino role in public marches and the citizenship aspect of their actions.
For the same crimes, minorities are given harsher punishments, according to the literature (Feld, Singer, Skolnick, & Roberts, 2012). Cultural bias toward the LGBTQ community and the impoverished are two structural problems that must be addressed (The Balance, 2019). This bias may lead to erroneous accusations and convictions of otherwise innocent persons. American Jury System The jury system is an important part of the American criminal justice system because it guarantees defendants the opportunity to be tried by a group of their peers.
Evidence of racial disparities exists at many levels of law enforcement from traffic stops, drug related arrests, and the use of force; but, the root cause is not always clear. Psychologist point to systemic problems and implicit biases. In matters of criminal justice, both can have life-altering implications. Racial bias is rooted in the human psychology by internal and external factors that are manifested through explicit and implicit discriminatory behavior.
Member of diverse ethnic and racial groups, particularly African Americans, believe that they are not treated with respect and believe that there is institutional racism in law enforcement. Institutionalized racism can be harmful to those impacted. For example, the use of pre-employment standardized tests claim that this kind of assessment could be biased toward people of a certain culture, so minorities tend to score lower (p. 48). Racism within law enforcement agencies has been documented for decades.
For example, the LAPD has does not release domestic violence statistics, because it is “feared that statistics reflecting the extent of domestic violence in minority communities might be selectively interpreted and publicized” (Crenshaw, 283). The reasoning for this is that it would paint communities with a high number of minorities, such as Black and Latino, as especially violent, which would allow people to “justify” negative stereotypes. These generalizations include a popularly conceived thought that black men are violent beings who cannot be controlled. With this information, domestic violence would mostly be seen in the eyes of the public as a minority issue, and not a “real” issue. In comparison to Amy McGee, a white woman, women of color are less likely to call the police.
“In recent months, police chiefs in Los Angeles and Houston have said that reports by Latinos of certain types of crime are down in their respective cities. Both chiefs blamed the declines on heightened fear of deportation among undocumented immigrants, a majority of whom are Latino. They say the trend is concerning because police departments rely on members of the community — regardless of their legal status — to report crimes when they occur.”
Racial Profiling Racial profiling is when law enforcement officials target individuals for suspicion of crime, based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Profiling is morally wrong. Profiling is a very dangerous.
CNN recently held a poll on the public’s opinion whether the police in their area are prejudice against non whites. 17% of whites said they believe most or some are prejudice meanwhile 42% of non whites felt the same way. They were also asked if they thought the U.S. criminal justice system treat whites and blacks equally. 50% of whites said yes and 21% of
Are the U.S. Legal and Justice System Fair to Women, Minorities, and All Culture Groups? Melanie Rivera Florida Technical College Mrs. Olsen 11/17/2014 Abstract Throughout this paper the reader will catch an understanding with different numbers of women, and minorities within the legal and justice system in the United States. By the end of the paper the researcher will make a point in whether or not the legal system is fair to all.
According to “A Defense of the Jury System”, “Also judges do not represent society, since most of them are still male, Caucasian, and from middle-class and well-to-do backgrounds. Many of them are different from many of the people that are arrested. In some cases, the jurors will vote against people different from them. Since most of them have white skin, they will probably convict blacks, African Americans, and Asians. “Women, minorities, and less wealthy people continue to be underrepresented in the court system.
Women convicted of “other property offenses” – a category of crimes that includes arson, receiving stolen property and breaking and entering — received shorter prison sentences. • Black female defendants were, in some ways, treated differently than white female defendants. Black women were assigned higher bond amounts and were more likely to be sent to prison than white women. Women of both races were equally likely to be released prior to
There are many indicators of the huge impact in disparities in sentencing women as compared to men and more so when it revolves around minorities ( race and class). Though there are lower crime rates among women as compared to men, there are significant disparities which tend to show favouritism to women. Research has shown that men get 63 per cent longer custodial sentences than women. In addition, it is twice more likely to have women get non custodial sentences even after conviction. However, as mentioned the disparities are more profound when issues of race and class are intertwined in the sentencing.
Michael King and Colin May emphasise the lack of understanding between BME parties and white, male judges to a have a detrimental impact on BME defendants; they criticised the lack of diversity in the judiciary and believe that “impressionistic accounts and limited empirical evidence suggest that they are more likely to be prosecuted than white people” . It is therefore plausible to assume that having a diverse judiciary across the courts will improve the satisfaction of all parties in a case; particularly, cases that involve Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic (BAME) parties. Recent evidence implies that the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 has not yet achieved the desired impact in making the judiciary more diverse however through a comparative lens the reforms have made a colossal effort to tackle the problem compared to ten years
