ipl-logo

Block Grant In Education Case Study

1031 Words5 Pages

Block grant in education Why the block grant allocation formula? Across the board , there are three mechanisms to transfer federal allocations to sub-national levels of government. This includes, formula-based, ad hoc, and political negotiations. The formula-based budget transfer system has at least three advantages over discretionary system. To begin with, it bases the evaluation of each region’s entitlement largely on objective variables, thus avoiding excessive bargaining by the regional governments. Thus it increases fairness of the distribution outcome. Next, if properly designed it can eliminate the disincentive inherent in many discretionary systems that encourage low tax efforts and overspending of the sub-national governments. Above all, among other things, a formula based transfer system creates equity among the regional governments and provides an effective means to address regional disparity. Despite all these benefits the development and implementation of the formula is never an easy task. A careful study of the relevant international experience and an assessment of the country’s own situation are required if the system is to be both economically rational and politically feasible. …show more content…

Positively, it gives the central government sufficient flexibility to respond to changing and unexpected fiscal needs arising among regions. On the negative side, it can created uncertainty for regional governments since they do not know how their grant will be allocated or how much they will receive. In the same vein, the third approach, the political negotiations, is often transparent and the federal government retains full discretionary authority to establish the fiscal needs of sub-national

Show More
Related
498 Words | 2 Pages

Taking after understanding by the organization on the option(s) to be advanced, a usage arrangement is created with the advisory group and different organizations itemizing such as roles and duties of staff members, communication strategies, financing necessities and components to source subsidizing, Change administration methodologies that may be required to bolster the execution of the favoured choice and Strategies to secure political backing for usage at a nearby, territorial, state and national level (if

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents

Read More
3068 Words | 13 Pages

In this model, each province has an equal representation, but each regional group votes as a block rather than as individuals. In the German Bundesrat, there is little in the way of policy debate, with a primary emphasis on evaluating and passing regulations. There is minimal room for individuality and in this only the regions would be represented, which would exclude special interest groups such as the First Nations. In this model, the regional groups may address the needs of the special interest groups, but they would be subordinate to regional interests.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

A block grant is a grant-in-aid granted to the states by the federal government and grants them the ability to spend the money in whichever broad program they wish to fund. An example of this could be the state choosing to use the block grant to fund education or health within the state. This increases the state’s power over the national government because the national government has no say or control over where the state decides to spend the money, as opposed to categorical grants where the national government can

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

Due to this dual federalism promote states to compete with each other which cause tension between

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

The second phase is to give the executive, managerial power to the people. Noveck explains, “Participatory budgeting has long been practiced in Porto Alegre, Brazil. They're just starting it in the 49th Ward in Chicago. Russia is using wikis to get citizens writing law together, as is Lithuania” (Noveck). The second phase might not work because not everybody is dedicated or educated to govern.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

The federal system is a system where both the central and state governments have equal authority and distribute it to the people. Most of the power in the federal government is supported with barely any opposed. People elect two different governments and each one of those are responsible for different tasks. The federal system has a written agreement where you can not make any changes to it unless you have consent from the individual state governments. The benefit of the federal system is that they can not make any changes without the encouragement from the states.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The delegation of smaller government allows the needs of specific groups and local representation to be more accessible to the people that

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

The distribution of block grants among states was based on the historical allocation of federal AFDC funds. Poorer states received less TANF money per poor child than wealthier states with tis style of funding. Because the block grant is fixed, this formula did little sense especially when the old formula in AFDC encouraged state

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

Despite the micromanagement benefits federal structure has to offer, after weighing both systems of government, it is reasonable to conclude and recommend Remedia for a unitary structure. A unitary structure seems to be the right recommendation because, the counterpart, a federal structure is often exercised among states with large borders in order to effectively manage and govern regions. However, Remedia’s country size is relatively small; thus, there is no need to divide power between the central government and the regional governments since it is inefficient. Furthermore, bearing in mind 99% of the Remedians share a common language and ethnicity and 96% are Buddhist, the unitary system creates a centralized government that could further

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

A country needs these programs to maintain an

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

The Madness that is Hamlet (will change) Hamlet, like many of Shakespeare’s plays, is very well known and is read in high schools around the world. A definite tragedy, the play centers around a boy named Hamlet, who's father (the King of Denmark) has just died. He is in the process of grieving and is deemed unstable to take the throne. Instead, his uncle Claudius takes it and in turn marries Hamlet’s mother, Queen Gertrude.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

School funding is also based on the school population size. Why should newer schools with high income students get to have a lot more resources then the other schools with low income students. Why is it that lower income schools aren’t given the same resources to help the students? These students with low income do have the same opportunity as the higher income new schools. A lot of those students don’t have access to internet or even have a ride for transportation.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Block Grant In Education Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document