George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World are terrifying novels about future dystopian societies. Both warnings from the authors of how they envisioned the future of society after experiencing war. Orwell feared that the government would control everything down to our thoughts. Huxley feared a government that would blind their people with happiness until they didn’t care about their own freedom. The two authors do a clear job expressing their fears and showing the reader what it would be like to experience them. However, do they fulfill an “Author’s duty” with their writings? Using William Faulkner’s 1950 Nobel Prize speech where he expressed that an author’s duty is to show man true emotions of the heart and to highlight the good situations with the bad. He thought one should not write about victories without hope or of defeats were nothing is truly lost. Faulkner also believed that even at the deepest and …show more content…
Winston despises the government named the Party and their restrictions on self-expression, sex, and free thinking. Yet when he begins his small desperate rebellion it’s nothing but a battle he can’t win against the Party. He himself knows it would be easier to give into the Party and in the beginning states, “It was like swimming against a current that swept you backwards however hard you struggled, and then suddenly deciding to turn round and go with the current instead of opposing it.” So, as he buys the diary, has his affair with Julia, and tries to find and join the Brotherhood it is all pointless, nothing but false hope. In the end Winston is caught, tortured, and is brainwashed into fully excepting the Party like he assumed would happen. It was a defeat where Winston didn’t truly lose anything because it was pointless from the start and he was unable to overcome Orwell’s