Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethos logos pathos
Apeals of pathos logos and ethos
Ethos logos pathos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethos logos pathos
Apeals of pathos logos and ethos
Ethos logos pathos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Act I, Scene ii, Cassius primarily employs ethos to gain Brutus's attention, logos to contest Caesar's power, and pathos to arouse Brutus’s passion. The use of ethos drove Brutus to listen and become a conspirator. Lines such as “ were I a common laughter, or did use / To stale with ordinary oaths my love to every protester …, then hold me dangerous” (I, ii, 72 - 78) instantly buys Brutus’s trust.
In the play, the two speeches contrast on the choice of rhetorical appeals towards the crowd. Brutus's speech, as the reader can see, appeals to the logic of the crowd while Mark Antony appeals to the emotions or pathos of the crowd. Brutas goes first when delivering the speech, his speech is quick and to the point. While trying not to cause chaos in the crowd, Brutas talks highly of himself to make himself seem honorable to the crowd. Brutas says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Shakespeare 3.2).
Brutus and Antony are the most predominant characters in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In act three Antony and Brutus give a very important speech to the people of rome in which the plebeians get to see their personality. In their speech they both engage one of the three Classical appeals: logos, an appeal to logic; ethos, an appeal to character; pathos which is an appeal to emotion. Although both speeches are similar in structure Antony’s speech is more effective because he wins over the plebeians, gets them to turn on noble Brutus and builds an army. Antony doesn’t have it great to begin.
When delivering his speech, Brutus clearly and efficiently uses all three rhetorical appeals brilliantly. At the start of his speech, Brutus conveys the message that the Romans should hear him for the true reason as to why he assassinated Julius Caesar. Furthermore, Brutus, truly and nobly, uses his credibility to persuade the citizens that because of his honor, they should believe his cause (reminder to put citation). Known throughout his life for his nobility, Brutus initializes his speech with a powerful use of Ethos. Yet, Brutus also established his emotional attachment to Caesar.
Another difference between the two speeches is when Antony speaks, he uses vocabulary that is more easily interpreted and understood by the audience, while Brutus was talking more complex, using a higher order
They are also trying to keep their reputation as good character in front of the crowd. This will probably cause the people to think about who to believe the most since they both are trying to look good. Antony’s and Brutus’ goal is to make sure they do not look bad in front of the crowd but to make sure the other person does look bad. Just like they expressed themselves using ethos, now they use pathos to get compassion. For example, in Antony’s speech he says “Bear with me.
In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus uses ethos, logos, and pathos, to justify the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus utilizes ethos by asking his audience to believe in him and his devotion to the republic. This proves to be effective since he is appealing to the ethical values of his fellow Romans. He then uses ethos immediately after by saying, “censure me in your wisdom,/and awaken your senses” in order to look attractive to his audience by complementing their wisdom. As Brutus furthers his claim he sways towards the use of pathos by saying “Brutus’ love to Caesar/was no less than his. .
Brutus uses ethos to question the morality of Brutus by giving evidence of Caesar not being being ambitious and saying that Brutus calls Caesar ambitious and he is an honorable man. This makes the common people doubt Brutus morals and credibility. Antony uses logos to convince the common people that Caesar could not be ambitious and to get them to question Brutus’ integrity and credibility. He tells the people about Caesar's will and that everybody in Rome is in his will. He tells them that Caesar left each citizen of Rome 75 drachmas and left his private gardens for all the citizens to stroll in and relax.
Though Antony makes effective points using ethos, his main advantage over Brutus comes from how he utilizes pathos. Antony appeals to the emotion of the people when he exclaims, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar / And I must pause till it come back to me. He weeps”
The less straight-forward approach wins the people’s hearts, as Antony reveals the flaws in Brutus’s justification without once calling him a traitor. Brutus seems to use the speech more to persuade himself, which weakens his effect on others, but since Brutus is likely denying his heart, which knows heit was made a dishonorable act, he cannot touch the emotions of the crowd, leaving a doorway for Antony to draw them in and kindle a fire of rage. Brutus’s weak appeal to only his honor only minorly won the Roman people, but honor alone was not enough against logic, friendliness, and emotion displayed by his
He then goes into explaining Caesar’s wrong-doings as a leader which gets the crowd to side with him leaving Antony at risk of a checkmate, if he does not make the appropriate move. During Antony’s speech, he says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (III.ii.90-91). Basically, Antony is giving credit to Brutus for crediting Caesar as an ambitious leader. And since Antony spoke highly of Brutus in front of a crowd that was “pro-Brutus”, they want to listen to him now. Now that Antony has the crowd listening to him, he uses pathos as his next move.
In the play, Julius Caesar, by Shakespeare, Brutus and Antony utilize ethos, pathos, and logos in their speeches. They do so in various ways to get the Romans on their side. Every character has their own personality that allows them to react differently to certain things. Brutus refers to his honor to vindicate himself while Antony wants to avenge the murder of Caesar. Both orators appeal to their credibility and trustworthiness to get the mob on their side.
The two speech differed by the amount of people that were reached to the crowds. Neither Brutus or Mark Antony targeted their speeches toward a specific audience. In my opinion, Mark Antony had a much more
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
They both had strong speeches in their logos. Brutus told the people that Caesar was killed for a reason by stating “had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, above all/ freemen?” (3.2 24-26). Brutus was telling the people that since Caesar are dead, everyone can be free and no one should have to be slaves by force. Even though that Brutus won in ethos and pathos, Antony had a slightly stronger logos appeal.