ipl-logo

Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony

352 Words2 Pages
Brutus and Mark Antony both had very similar speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. They both showed a lot of emotion and gave Julius Caesar some defense as to why he was killed. They both claimed that Julius Caesar was very ambitious. Brutus wanted everyone who had listened to his speech that the death of Julius Caesar benefited many and especially benefited the slaves as it helped them become free. Brutus intended for his speech to keep the crowds from getting angry and violent towards them due to their hatred for Julius Caesar. The two speech differed by the amount of people that were reached to the crowds. Neither Brutus or Mark Antony targeted their speeches toward a specific audience.

In my opinion, Mark Antony had a much more
Show More
Related
592 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus speech in many ways differed from Antony’s speech. He used plenty of ethos and pathos but failed to use logos, Which Antony utilizes fairly well. A good example of pathos in famous speeches is Martin Luther King Jr’s “I have a dream”

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

In the play, the two speeches contrast on the choice of rhetorical appeals towards the crowd. Brutus's speech, as the reader can see, appeals to the logic of the crowd while Mark Antony appeals to the emotions or pathos of the crowd. Brutas goes first when delivering the speech, his speech is quick and to the point. While trying not to cause chaos in the crowd, Brutas talks highly of himself to make himself seem honorable to the crowd. Brutas says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Shakespeare 3.2).

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Knowledge of the audience and rebuttals were his main weapons. Because of Marc Antony’s masterful use of ethos, repetition, and awareness of the audience, his speech was superior, and rings out in history more than Brutus’ speech. Although pathos and logos are important, both Brutus and Marc Antony primarily

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both used different techniques in order to capture the audience's attention and approval in their speeches about Caesar's death. They both include repetition, rhetorical strategies, dramatic pauses, and parallelism in order to get the crowd on their sides. Both men use different strategies by knowing the audience and they use this to their advantage. Brutus and Antony both choose the use of Pathos and Ethos specifically appeal to the audience and their love for their country.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

The remark, “Both speeches had their unique own way of addressing the crowd as well as differing styles and techniques” on the website (classicnetworks.com). Brutus’s character was defined as a smart, honorable person, who appealed more to logical facts. Antony’s character appealed more to a loving person. He was understanding, and he usually attached more to people’s emotions.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Who’s Speech Had More Support? The “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakesphere is a history and tragedy play used to give information on Julius Caesar’s death while adding everyday conflict. In the story Julius Caesar, the main characters start a plot against Caesar that will lead to his death. During the funeral two people gave speeches, such as Mark Antony and Brutus. Mark Antony and Brutus’s speeches were different from each other in two ways.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Antony knows the truth of the people, that is why his speech contains more pathos and ethos than Brutus’s. The outcome of the speeches are very similar. At the end of both, the crowd cheers for their leader because they are fickle and easily persuaded. One of Brutus’s fatal flaws was leaving and letting

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

L 86, 89, 94-95). Antony really tries to appeal Caesar to the crowd and all his triumphs, not faults. At this point in their speeches, Brutus and Antony had the crowd swayed the way they

Read More
272 Words | 2 Pages

Although Brutus speaks only the truth and facts expressing his true feelings, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he uses Ethos, Pathos, and Logos and he appeals more to the Roman

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus's speech was way better than Antony because he got all the people to convince the people of Rome to be on his side. In the text scene 3 act 2, Brutus convinces all the people

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Antony wanted the crowd to listen to him and what he had to say. He also wanted to do nothing else but bury Caesar and have a funeral for him. He also had no other motives but to have a funeral while Brutus left and not staying for the funeral on honoring Caesar. Antony also wants to protect Caesars legacy and only wants to protect it and not ruin his legacy and he also isn't saying anything bad about Caesar. Mark Antony was also the better person to give the speech because the crowd turned against Brutus and went to Antonys side right

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar Speech Comparison Shakespeare wrote the play “Julius Caesar” based on the historical figure Julius Caesar. The tragedy focuses on the well known demise of Caesar and the aftermath of his death. Directly following Caesar’s death, Shakespeare has imagined the speeches that Brutus and Mark Antony could have given at the funeral. Brutus being Caesar’s murderer, and Mark Antony a friend of Caesar 's plotting for revenge. The two speeches contrast greatly in the intent of their meaning, and they use stylistic devices in order to do so.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

They both had strong speeches in their logos. Brutus told the people that Caesar was killed for a reason by stating “had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, above all/ freemen?” (3.2 24-26). Brutus was telling the people that since Caesar are dead, everyone can be free and no one should have to be slaves by force. Even though that Brutus won in ethos and pathos, Antony had a slightly stronger logos appeal.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony

Related Topics

Open Document