In the play, the two speeches contrast on the choice of rhetorical appeals towards the crowd. Brutus's speech, as the reader can see, appeals to the logic of the crowd while Mark Antony appeals to the emotions or pathos of the crowd. Brutas goes first when delivering the speech, his speech is quick and to the point. While trying not to cause chaos in the crowd, Brutas talks highly of himself to make himself seem honorable to the crowd. Brutas says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Shakespeare 3.2).
Brutus’s and Antony’s speech both have fairly different meanings. Though you can find some similarities in their very eloquent speeches. Out of all the rhetorical devices one thing they use quite often is rhetorical question. For example in Brutus’s speech he says, “Who is here so base that would be a bondman?”. Antony uses, talking about crowning Caesar, “Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”.
Knowledge of the audience and rebuttals were his main weapons. Because of Marc Antony’s masterful use of ethos, repetition, and awareness of the audience, his speech was superior, and rings out in history more than Brutus’ speech. Although pathos and logos are important, both Brutus and Marc Antony primarily
The remark, “Both speeches had their unique own way of addressing the crowd as well as differing styles and techniques” on the website (classicnetworks.com). Brutus’s character was defined as a smart, honorable person, who appealed more to logical facts. Antony’s character appealed more to a loving person. He was understanding, and he usually attached more to people’s emotions.
Who’s Speech Had More Support? The “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakesphere is a history and tragedy play used to give information on Julius Caesar’s death while adding everyday conflict. In the story Julius Caesar, the main characters start a plot against Caesar that will lead to his death. During the funeral two people gave speeches, such as Mark Antony and Brutus. Mark Antony and Brutus’s speeches were different from each other in two ways.
Antony knows the truth of the people, that is why his speech contains more pathos and ethos than Brutus’s. The outcome of the speeches are very similar. At the end of both, the crowd cheers for their leader because they are fickle and easily persuaded. One of Brutus’s fatal flaws was leaving and letting
In Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, the main character, Julius Caesar, believes he has two good friends in Mark Antony and Brutus, and he has good reason to believe so. That is until Brutus literally stabs Caesar in the back. Now it is time for Caesar’s funeral and both Brutus and Antony are giving speeches. During their speeches, Brutus and Antony use ethos, logos, and pathos, but with very different intentions. Brutus intends to justify his actions, and gain the support of the Roman people.
Although Brutus speaks only the truth and facts expressing his true feelings, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he uses Ethos, Pathos, and Logos and he appeals more to the Roman
Brutus's speech was way better than Antony because he got all the people to convince the people of Rome to be on his side. In the text scene 3 act 2, Brutus convinces all the people
“Friends, Romans, countrymen…”(3.2.1). So goes the beginning of Mark Antony’s funeral speech. In Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, there are quite a few memorable speeches. Both Antony and Brutus give very convincing speeches at Caesar’s funeral. While both were great, Antony has the better speech because he uses emotion and logical thinking to his advantage, swaying the crowd with manipulative language.
Caesar Speech Comparison Shakespeare wrote the play “Julius Caesar” based on the historical figure Julius Caesar. The tragedy focuses on the well known demise of Caesar and the aftermath of his death. Directly following Caesar’s death, Shakespeare has imagined the speeches that Brutus and Mark Antony could have given at the funeral. Brutus being Caesar’s murderer, and Mark Antony a friend of Caesar 's plotting for revenge. The two speeches contrast greatly in the intent of their meaning, and they use stylistic devices in order to do so.
In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak at Caesar’s funeral. They both make strong points in their different speeches, and leave the audience feeling weak but then empowered. It can be argued that Antony gave the more effective speech. Antony’s speech was more effective through his use of irony and emotion.
Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with
They both had strong speeches in their logos. Brutus told the people that Caesar was killed for a reason by stating “had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, above all/ freemen?” (3.2 24-26). Brutus was telling the people that since Caesar are dead, everyone can be free and no one should have to be slaves by force. Even though that Brutus won in ethos and pathos, Antony had a slightly stronger logos appeal.
Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
