Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of drunk driving
Penalties drunk driving
Topic about speed limits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine a situation in which a report came out that a 17-year-old was arrested for the killing of his next-door neighbor with the use of a shotgun. The video explains how adolescents from different age groups were sentenced to different types of crime. Juvenile criminal systems are different from adult criminal systems because innocent or guilty isn’t involved in that type of case as the juvenile is still a minor. For the adult criminal system, the criminal who is an adult has the option to bond and has a right to a jury trial as well. The proper age to be charged as an adult is 17 years old.
(Roper v. Simmons, 2005) As the justice of the Supreme Court, there needs to be an end to "totality of the circumstances" in some juvenile offender’s cases. If every juvenile offender's attorney claim age as a “reasonable grounds” to have their case overturned this will become a continuous problem throughout the United States. The Court has recognized that juveniles lack maturity in judgment, have an underdeveloped sense of responsibility, are vulnerable to adverse influences than adults, impulsive, reckless, risk-taking, and cannot extricate themselves from detrimental crime producing situations. (Elrod & Ryder, 2014)
As Steele writes, “Statutory law can require certain serious crimes, such as murder, be charged in adult court even if the defendant is a minor” (9). What Steele is trying to argue here is that there are limits to which a juvenile can commit and still get back into society after rehabilitation. If the juvenile does a life-threatening action such as a homicide he would learn the mistake he made through a serious consequence of life imprisonment without parole. Finally, it is evident that if juveniles commit serious crimes they should be punished to learn and realize what they have done wrong in
The Roper Court identified three general differences between juveniles and adults that justify the conclusion that juveniles are less culpable for their criminal behavior, and therefore undeserving of the harsh penalties we reserve for adults. First,
I highly agree with Marjie, minors should be charged as adults if needed to, if the crime was pretty drastic then they should be punished as adults. Marjie Lundstrom states, ”These days for under-eighteen crowd,the group we routinely write off as “only kids.” It's why they can't smoke,or drink,or go to R movies without our OK.It’s why we fret over their internet access and fuss about driving privileges”, this statement was so accurate, she makes a point on how us teens have restrictions on certain things,so if we break one of these things it doesn't make a difference either way we should get a serious
For these reasons, this is why juveniles should be tried as an adult, regardless of the situation that led them to do it. Teenagers that commit a crime such as murder, robbery, or beating up someone
Juveniles are different than adults obviously, but they should know from right and wrong at this point. “Kids are kids-until they commit crimes” written by Marjie Lundstrom says this, “Until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager we are to call them adults.” The point she makes here is that they are kids up until they commit a crime they are viewed as young adults not kids anymore but young adults. “We’ve created this image that teenagers are something to be feared.”
When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.
The major dangers of speeding include the environmental aspect, driving too fast for road conditions, and speeding kills. Driving responsibly is our duty as citizens. We must be defensive in our driving habits. Defensive driving is driving to save lives, time and money, in spite of the conditions around you and the actions of others. Also, defensive driving is the responsibility of everyone who operates a vehicle in our roadway community.
In the beginning of the story, it talks about how Mr.Dursley starts to see odd things. He has a feeling that the odd things are about Harry. Since Harry parents both have died by an evil wizard. They lied to Harry saying that he parents died in a car crash. In the text it says "In the car crash when your parents died, she said.
Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.
The higher the speed limit, the more likely the crash will be severe. There happens to be proven research that shows that speed has little effect on how fast people drive. “ People are capable of finding a good speed without the following the speed limit signs” (Boyles). Sometimes the driver gets distracted and loses his or her focus on the road. Speeding and being distracted, even by the smallest things, can cause an accident or even life threatening injures.
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.
Teenagers are not perfect, and their irrational behavior can lead to poor decisions that could potentially be dangerous and unlawful. A debate has now occurred for many years that deals with the issue of sentencing teens that have committed serious crimes such as murder and robbery. Many people argue that if juveniles commit these crimes that their punishment should be equal to an adults punishment for serious crimes, but juveniles shouldn’t have to worry about their lives getting ruined. Most juveniles and teenagers do not have enough maturity to survive in the adult prison system, and recent brain development research shows us that teenagers brains are not even close to being finished developing. Therefore, teenagers and youth under the age of eighteen should
If we look at the different criminal justice systems around the world, most countries have laws or regulations stating the “age of criminal responsibility” (Maher. G). However, there has been no clear international standard identified regarding the age at which criminal responsibility could be reasonably charged for a juvenile offender. The Convention on the Rights of Children (CRC) appeals parties to establish ‘a minimum age below which children shall be