ipl-logo

Cesar Chavez's Argumentative Analysis

654 Words3 Pages

Cesar Chavez published an article on the tenth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s death about why nonviolent resistance is more successful than violence. He demonstrates the importance of nonviolence, why people choose to support it, and how different nonviolence activists, like Dr. King and Gandhi, were successful in using this tactic. Chavez also talks about the problems with utilizing violence as a form of resistance. Cesar Chavez wrote about important leaders that used nonviolence as a form of resistance and what tactics made them powerful and influential. Chavez started by stating that the entirety of Dr. King’s life was “an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world” (Line 1-2). It is hard to make any difference in society because most people feel a sense of dislike towards change. The remarkable actions that were made by Dr. King both motivated and encouraged many people. He made powerful speeches that inspired the lives of many to follow in his footsteps towards the path of nonviolence. This caused people to look past …show more content…

He writes that there are two possible outcomes from violence. The first being that the more violence present, the more there will be of fatalities and injuries on both sides of the conflict. The second result Chavez describes is that “there will be a total demoralization of the workers” (Line 20). People may see violence as the easiest and quickest way to accomplish change due to the fear they inflict on others. Mindlessly causing death and violence will force people to forget about the importance of innocent lives and justice. Failing to see this importance will strip people of their spirit, morale, and strength. Utilizing violence to make change won’t help in any way, whereas nonviolence it the opposite. This is why people prefer nonviolent

Show More
Related
701 Words | 3 Pages

We would lose regard for human beings. Then the struggle would become a mechanical thing. When you lose your sense of life and justice, you lose your strength,” the text talks about how if we decide to use violence it comes with other unforeseen repercussions and goes into detail of what these consequences are. The references to time provide a contrast and traits of similarity in order to further reinforce Chavez's supportive stance on nonviolence. The use Dr. King, Gandhi and mentions of history in itself provide an ethic to the writer by point out past examples that have proved to be key in rebellions and

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Gospel of Cesar Chavez: My Faith in Action, by Mario T. Garcia, uses Cesar Chavez’s own words to express his spiritual and religious personality and how it led him to organize a movement for a change in the farm workers’ lifestyle of America. Through his experiences and observations with religion and spirituality growing up, Cesar created his own myth by conveying nonviolence and self-sacrifice as the basis of his American religious experience. Thus, paving the way towards reform for farm workers. To be able to understand Cesar’s motive behind his movement, violence and nonviolence needs to be distinguished. A violent movement is a protest that is set up to achieve a goal by using violent acts (riots, house raids, etc.).

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

Chavez begins his argument by saying that a human life is an irreplaceable “possession given by God”. By resorting to violence, it has the grim possibility of being taken away. Chavez further expands his use of ethos by providing examples of ethics and morals. Nonviolence gathers support for moral causes, whereas unethical actions create discouragement among followers. Violence is merely the result

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

It contains a series of interviews conducted by Bob Fitch with Cesar Chavez. It focuses on the grape boycott of California and the tactics Chavez used. Bob Fitch visited Cesar Chavez and the farm workers and explained their plight. The words of the workers were important in supporting the thesis of this research. This article focuses on why Chavez did what he did, why he took matters into his own hands, and risked everything he had to help the migrant farm workers.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

In 1965, a Filipino union group called The Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee “struck when the Delano grape growers cut the pay rates during harvest” (Rick Tejada-Flores PBS). Because of this, the strike went on, and Chavez became the leader, according to PBS. As a result, the grape strike began and lasted for five years (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Because Chavez learned writings from St. Francis and Gandhi, he decided to put that into play. According to PBS, Chavez’ group would fight without the use of violence.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Violence was never the answer with Chavez. “I am convinced, that the truest act of courage, the strongest act of manliness, is to sacrifice ourselves for others in a totally nonviolent struggle for justice." Chavez wanted to follow the steps of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. with nonviolent acts. Also, set an example for the people that brutality is not the answer to achieving goals. Chavez sacrificed his health to prove a point in his nonviolent path to success.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

In order to achieve true freedom one must discover that you can break unjust laws through peaceful protest. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and “The Speech at The March Washington” by Josephine Baker each article passionately argues about the disadvantages of the black community, the equality and power of education. We must learn to act with patients and not guns we must protect are self’s with a pen and paper not violence. Dr. King once4 said “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is unique in history which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.

Read More
2399 Words | 10 Pages

In order to further prove that nonviolence is the way to stop racism and gain equality, Dr. King writes: “I'm grateful to God that, through the Negro church, the dimension of nonviolence entered our struggle. If this philosophy had not emerged, I am convinced that by now many streets of the South would be flowing with floods of blood” (). In this quote, Dr. King once again argues that non violence and peace are the best ways to stop the cycle of violence. The phrase “the dimension of nonviolence entered our struggle” shows that even though they are struggling, nonviolence can help them.

Read More
1842 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” This is one of the most well-known quotes in the Declaration of Independence. It states that all men are created equal, that they are entitled to their rights. This is what America is supposed to represent, this is why so many people all over the world flock here, for freedom and equality. In some ways this statement has been represented well, but it definitely has not been fully manifested they way it appears.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

The story says that “The Association was a group of people who helped farm workers have better rights and better pay.” Chavez and his supporters successfully improved the lives of farmers and farm workers. The story states, “Through boycotts, hunger strikes, and marches, they made a difference for everyone. ”These days he still inspires community activists and politicians. The story states, “His speeches about justice, community, and education still resonate…”

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

Chavez asserts repeatedly that nonviolence is the only way for change to happen. The repeated use of “we”, “us” and “our” conveys the message to the audience that he is one of them. Chavez can relate to the farm workers based on his credibility (ethos) because of his past. Chavez went to work on the farm fields at a young age and knew exactly how the frustrated workers felt.

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.

Read More

More about Cesar Chavez's Argumentative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document