In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered the cosmological redshift and used it to establish the rate at which the universe was expanding. It is difficult to dismiss the supposition that the Big Bang was a giant, primordial explosion. Since the beginning, it has been generally assumed that, regardless of the cause, that under the influence of gravitation, the expansion of the universe must be slowing.
It now seems unlikely that the expansion of the Big Bang involved a shock wave. This is an important consideration. It is unlikely that the expansion of the universe is directly related to any explosive “Big Bang.”
Like the Big Bang, the “Challenger disaster” is often referred to as an explosion. Since there was no shock wave, the review team
…show more content…
In keeping with the simplest concept pledge, let us consider that if any object or action physically existed before time began, even for a twinkle of God’s eye, there was also probably potential energy, potential dark energy, or perhaps both if there was a difference at that time. However, without specifics this is not helpful.
Apparently, the conditions somehow became right for the formation of the space network out of the fabrons (dark energy of space).
(From the current scientific point of view, it is unknown what the conditions were and whether they were internal or external. It is also unknown where the energy came from, how, or when.) Some of this will be discussed later.
Due to the presumed 1) small space, 2) high temperature and 3) homogeneity, it is probable that the space network formed everywhere concomitantly in an incredible expansion by a factor of about 1050 in a process called the epoch of inflation.
Of course, “everywhere” was initially a very tiny smaller-than-a-speck “singularity.” Particle physicists tell us there is no limit to the number of photons that can simultaneously occupy the same tiny