ipl-logo

Comparison Of Aristotle And The Cosmological Argument

914 Words4 Pages

The most interesting idea throughout the texts of Aristotle and Plato would have to be on the gods and proving that there is a god. There are three main philosophical arguments to prove the existence of god. There is the Ontological Argument, the Cosmological Argument, and the Teleological Argument. There are many different objections to these arguments. CONTINUE
The first one is the Ontological Argument. The Ontological Argument by Anselm is the belief that God is the highest possible being imaginable to us. Therefore, God exists as an idea in our minds. However, to be the greatest being, god would also have to exist in reality because that is more important than existing in our minds. Since it would be a contradiction for God not to exist …show more content…

If something is an idea in our mind, then it must also be real. It is a first principle and the firmest principle of all. Our minds cannot create anything in our minds that is not real. axioms common to all the special sciences. Aristotle says that it is a principle which “is necessary for anyone to have who knows any of the things that are” (Metaphysics IV). Therefore, if you believe something exists, you must also believe in the Ontological Argument because without it, you would not be able to know of anything in this …show more content…

If God does not need a cause of existence, why would the universe need one? Therefore, stating that God does not need a cause, contradicts the whole cosmological argument. If God must exist for the sake of having the universe, there must be a cause for god too. To argue the idea that you need a final cause for motion, there are many physical events at the sub-atomic quantum that have no evident cause. Besides these new scientific discoveries, why couldn’t there be more than one final cause? Why couldn’t there just have been a phenomenon that scientists have not discovered yet? These are just more questions that could be added to the opposition of the Cosmological

Show More
Related

Analysis Of Saint Anselm's Ontological Argument

513 Words | 3 Pages

Saint Anselm came up with the ontological argument that only a fool would believe that God does not exist. An ontological argument is hand in hand with a Platonic a priori where there is a strong attempt made to prove that God exists by the concept of his existence. Saint Anselm’s argument is that even someone thick minded, or has a low IQ can state that there is a God, and for this to be possible, God must exist. He backs his argument up by comparing what is imagined up in the mind and what is in reality. Reality is existence, and imagining something up is nonexistent.

Read More

Ockham's Razor And Cosmological Argument

1241 Words | 5 Pages

Faith is the root of many actions and thereby reactions in our society, and world today. These religious practices must go through many trials and questionings from the always cynical, ever searching individuals. Due to the questioning of God’s existence, St. Thomas Aquinas and Anselm devised three arguments as was of explanation for His existence. Ontological, cosmological and teleological arguments are put forth to hopefully one day prove God’s existence. We are a people who crave for simplicity, there is nothing simple about the devout in their faith, we will look to find simpler explanations, or Ockham’s razor, for the three arguments put forth by Aquinas and Anselm.

Read More

Analysis Of Anselm's Ontological Argument

1625 Words | 7 Pages

Anselm’s “Ontological Argument” The general idea of the ontological argument is based on the notion that the concept of God as the greatest being implies that God exists—if not, there could be something greater, namely an existent greatest being—but this being would be God. The structure of the Ontological Argument can be outlined as follows (The argument is based on Anselm 's Proslogion 2): 1. We conceive of God as a being than which no greater can be conceived.

Read More

Plato's Views On The Allegory Of The Cave

1377 Words | 6 Pages

The definition of God is the greatest being. A thought of something that exists is greater than a thought of something that does not exist. That means if God is just a thought that does not exist, there must be a being greater than Him. This would contradict the definition of God. Therefore, God must exist so that the definition would be true.

Read More

Mccloskey: Proof Of The Existence Of God

1286 Words | 6 Pages

However, as far as we know, the universe is

Read More

Saint Anselm's Objection To The Ontological Argument

1400 Words | 6 Pages

Philosophy Hamad aldawood Monday, March 19, 2018 Introduction The Ontological Argument was proposed by Saint Anselm to try and ascertain the existence of God. Anselm’s argument is based on the fact that there is a specific concept of God. It establishes the existence of God as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" (Roth, 1970, p.270). From Saint Anselm’s argument, it is apparent that Ontological Arguments are mostly deductive and a priori.

Read More

Just By Thinking About God We Can Know He Exists Analysis

429 Words | 2 Pages

“Just by Thinking about God We Can Know He Exists” Summary & Response The article Just by Thinking about God We Can Know He Exists recounts the experience of Anselm, an 11th -century Italian philosopher who is now referred as St. Anselm. He sets up an imaginary argument, called the Ontological Argument, to prove God's existence. He believes that God is so superior that “nothing greater can be thought” (80, St. Anselm). The argument ultimately forces his imaginary adversary to accept God's existence.

Read More

Ontological Argument For God's Existence Of God

575 Words | 3 Pages

The ontological argument is a priori argument. A priori argument is one that does not rely on sense experience. They give necessary or certain truths about the way ideas relate to one another. These truths do not tell us about the world however we know them to be true. For example; a triangle has three sides, either it is raining or it is not.

Read More

Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

539 Words | 3 Pages

Anselm famously associated with the “ontological argument” for the existence of God. Anselm, in Proslogion, coined the term “ontological” to describe a branch of philosophy that deals with the notion of “being or existence.” (McGrath & OverDrive, Inc. 2001 p. 181). Proslogion is a work of meditation, not of logical argument.

Read More

Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More

Anselm Vs Descartes Ontological Argument

945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More

Ontological Argument Analysis

994 Words | 4 Pages

The Ontological Argument is defined as the argument that God, being described as the most great or perfect, must exist, since a God who exists is greater than a God who does not (Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100250688). It belongs to the Philosophy of Religions and not Theology; there is a difference between Philosophy of Religion and Theology, even though they both take God and religion as their subject. Theology starts with assuming that God exists and aids in figuring out what follows or it sometimes solves philosophical problems that might arise from the belief in God. Theology is slightly more strict and they have limits to their premises, one of those limits is not believing in God. Another

Read More

Comparing Aristotle's Ideas And Western Beliefs

523 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that Aristotle’s ideas are more significant as they closer to western beliefs than Plato’s. Similarities can be found in religion, art, government, and evolution. Unlike Plato, Aristotle believed in the idea of a god, much like many people today. He believed that God was the First thing to exist, separate from all matter and is the ultimate form. As well as is a pure minded being.

Read More

Essay Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God

818 Words | 4 Pages

Argument for the existence of god is being proposed in several ways. Some based on science while some are about personal experience and some on philosophical arguments such as ontological arguments, first cause arguments, arguments based on deign, moral arguments. Each of these support conception. Ontological argument say that if you inculcate the idea of god , we can see him . There is a saying that “Nothing comes from Nothing but something comes from something”.

Read More

Existence Of God Analysis

1027 Words | 5 Pages

That is right but here we are only imagining two situation one is just idea of God and another is idea plus reality. But how can we assume that God exists in reality even we don’t know about God’s existence. It seems just a logic which is self-contradictory. We can also apply this logic to other things, maybe this logic will not work. Let’s imagine that electricity is not available in a room, so fan, which is hanging there, is not working.

Read More

More about Comparison Of Aristotle And The Cosmological Argument

Related Topics

Open Document