Changing Figure In Greek Art

1073 Words5 Pages

The Changing Figure from Ancient Egypt to Greece
There are many subtle characteristics of human anatomy. When the knowledge is expand, the artist can create realistic and detailed work of the human body. The Old Kingdom was a great influence on the way Greece went about sculpting in the Archaic period. The Old Kingdom went on between 2575-2134 BCE and the Archaic period lasted from 600-480 BCE. The concept of anatomy and technical achievements has dramatically changed the look of sculpture from the Old Kingdom to the Archaic period.
A key element of the Archaic period advancements in sculpting was the restoration of trading connections between Greece and Egypt. "The frontal pose, the left foot extended forward, the arms attached or close to the hips, the rigid pose, and the mysterious smile are all characteristics of the Kouros and Kore statues of the Archaic period... evidently influenced by ancient Egypt as the commerce between the two …show more content…

“Dying Warrior” (430 BCE) from the west pediment of the Temple of Aphaia in Aegina, Greece. It is 5 feet 2 ½ inches long made out of marble. In Khafre’s sculpture he is sitting very stiff and there is no true natural fluidity of the body. For instance, Khafre is sitting but his whole body is attached to the throne or there is no negative space in the arch of the back or where his legs are. Also his hips are straight forward instead of how a person really sits down and their hip squishes and rounds out. The “Dying Warrior” is on his side with a bronze arrow in his chest and still has the archaic smile (Gardner pg. 122). His body and muscles conforms to the position he is laying on the ground. The warriors arms, abs, hips, legs and buttocks all synchronize in that it is what a person would look like in that action. To simply compare the two sculptures, the “Dying Warrior” less ridged than “Khafre