Each development in scientific comprehension encounters some resistance. Charles Darwin was extremely apprehensive to announce his findings, because he knew he would get censured by the world. Particularly the religious world. His theory of Evolution has managed to provoke those involved in the church and those who are not. The reality is Darwin did not intend to provoke anyone or their faith. His true intentions were to inform what truly was happening out in the world. The world he spent traveling for five years and no one else had. Those who reject his theory believe that there is no evidence, true science, and is made to attack those who believe in God.
There's a plenty of confirmation that Darwin has to back his hypothesis and there’s one
…show more content…
They have the same attributes and even structures. That’s called Natural Selection, which does involve DNA, but those who criticize seem to forget that it’s one of the main sources of evidence. Creating a new species is also deemed to be foolish and apart of the imagination. Which is another critic that I see as unreasonable, but understandable. Speciation is the formation of one new species by combining two older species. On the off chance that there is more separation between two gatherings that once were the same species they have a high probability of speciation to happen. So, it’s understandable that those who criticize don’t understand, because they are not aware of the distance or the …show more content…
Jason Lisle, Evolution: The Anti-Science, https://answersingenesis.org.) Darwin did not intend to ruin or deny the bible. The reason he was worried to introduce his theory with the world was he himself was afraid too. Darwin's discoveries were not something he made up. He was an extensive note taker, everything was written in pure detail. Afraid of what he discovered and how he was going to tell the world. The theory of evolution was not made to break others faith, it should actually help it grow