Shaun Callarman’s argument about Chris McCandless highlights how McCandless’s lifestyle choices ultimately led to his death. Callarman asserts that McCandless had no business and no common sense in venturing into the Alaskan wilderness. He emphasizes that McCandless, who was unprepared, without family, and without a home, was doomed to fail in such a harsh environment. Callarman characterizes McCandless as arrogant, reckless, and crazy, arguing that these traits were central to his tragic end. In line with and agreeing with Shaun, it’s clear that Chris made terrible choices in his life. For example, he went into the rough Alaska environment with little-to-no food and proper equipment. He also had no map or compass. These poor actions show he was unprepared and didn’t understand the problems that he …show more content…
For example, he went into the rough Alaska environment with little-to-no food and proper equipment. He also had no map or compass. These poor actions show he was unprepared and didn’t understand the problems that he would face later due to his decisions. Books influenced Chris's desire to live simply and close to nature, but he ignored the practical realities of surviving in the wild. This is evident in his lack of preparation for hunting and preserving food, which eventually led to starvation. Shaun also points out that Chris was arrogant, a trait that contributed significantly to his demise. This is evident in how he ignored advice from more experienced people. Jim Gallien, an Alaskan who gave Chris a ride to the edge of the wilderness, shared his concern about Chris’s survival skills. Despite Gallien’s willingness to help, Chris chose to overlook his advice. This stubborn independence is seen again when he rejects the offer of better equipment and supplies. Such behavior highlights a recurring theme of overconfidence in his ability to survive, which ultimately led to fatal