ipl-logo

Chuck Klosterman Analysis

893 Words4 Pages

If a person told someone that whatever they told them would not leave the room, would that person be able to keep that secret? What if they told them that an innocent person got put in jail for a crime they did not commit? Chuck Klosterman begins to explain that a patient had headaches and that an innocent person was convicted of a serious crime that the patient had committed. The headaches then resolved after getting the truth out to the doctor. The way the doctor responds to the situation is another way of determining what type of person they are, or what resolution of the situation will best respect the rights of both the doctor and the patient. These are examples of The Virtue Approach and The Rights Approach. In “Should I Protect a Patient …show more content…

The Hippocratic oath is an oath that requires a new physician to swear, by a number of healing gods, to uphold specific ethical standards. The Hippocratic oath He explains that this situation is all based off of “doing no harm.” Klosterman asks, “are you doing harm by allowing someone to be penalized for a crime they did not commit?” If the doctor follows The Virtue Approach and resolves the situation with what option helps him act as the sort of person he is, he will still be doing harm. This is because he could help the innocent person get out of trouble and the patient be the person convicted. Or he could keep the secret and let the innocent stranger continue to be charged for something they did not do and let the patient live their life like nothing happened. But, if the doctor chooses The Rights Approach and resolves the situation with what option will best respect all people who have a stake, they are still doing harm. The doctor could keep the secret between him and the patient and that lets the innocent person stay in jail and the patient and doctor are now both living with the guilt of knowing. Or, the doctor could tell authority and get the innocent person out of trouble and let the patient be convicted for the crime they really committed. Whichever approach of ethics the doctor chooses to take will do harm to someone and wont follow the Hippocratic

Show More
Related

Tomcik Case Study

785 Words | 4 Pages

After reading this case I was terribly shocked about the fact that something like this could happen in our medical history. I couldn’t believe how a patient could be neglected so much. Based on the material that we have learned the lack of ethical theory of deontology in Dr. Evan was disturbing. As a doctor Dr. Evan’s role is to care for patients, keep them away from harm and prolong their life. Though in the trial he stated as if he didn’t care.

Read More

Ethical Issues In The Case Of John The Paramedic

568 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of John the paramedic, there is an ethical debate if it was right or wrong to not treat a patient, that according to John and a witness the patient try to rape a girl, the patient got stabbed in the stomach by the girl's mother, which eventually led to the patient's death. I conclude that John, being the paramedic, did something completely wrong in his decision to not treat a patient and let him die. John the paramedic lost his credentials and job. If I were John I would treat the patient and save his life, it does not matter if he did something completely wrong, I would save the patient's life because I am not a judge.

Read More

The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks By Rebecca Skloot

1559 Words | 7 Pages

Consequently taking away the patients decision and instead giving physicians full control to seemingly “play god”, as the decision is now in their hand. Through this problem within the medical community, society has inadvertently traded off ethics in pursuit for common good (Martinez). Because of this, such practices as benevolent deception in hospitals had room to emerge during the Jim Crow era. As doctors apparently took the decision of the patient in their own hands. Benevolent deception was a widely common practice during the times of Henrietta Lacks.

Read More

The Benevolent Deception In The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lack

351 Words | 2 Pages

Doctors, one side of the coin they are viewed as the ones that can cure the sick with their knowledge, the ones that are supposed to help them get better. The other side they are feared and are avoided at all cost by some. Doctors have this bad reputation about them because sometimes they don’t even tell their patients what is wrong with them. Or the patients themselves don’t even question the doctors because they went to school and have a prestigious piece of paper. In “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, she describes benevolent deception, which doctors had no trouble of doing in the mid-century, as the doctors keeping their patients in the dark.

Read More

Summary Of Chapter 4 By David Thomasa

434 Words | 2 Pages

In Chapter 4, David Thomasa speaks about truth telling and how it becomes an important key factor in a clinical setting. “In each of the three main reasons why the truth must be told, as a right, an utility, and a kindness, lurk values that may from time to time become important than the truth.” (Vaughn 155,2017). By saying telling the truth is a right, he implies that it is a way of showing respect to another person. If the physician and patient experiences reversed roles, I would expect them to want the physician to be honest with them as well.

Read More

Henrietta Lacks Informed Consent Essay

1650 Words | 7 Pages

If the patient were to die during surgery or procedures, the physicians would not be held accountable if the patient signs the consent form stating they were aware of the risks to their care. It’s important for the patient to ask any questions if they are confused on any information that was given to them. Even though, if the patient is diagnosed with a life-threatening disease or infection they have the right to refuse from signing the consent form. Since the patient is legally competent to make their own decisions that regard their health, they can still disregard any treatments that are being done to them. In most cases, doctors that perform experiments on the patient without their knowledge and without their consent is known as unethical human experiment.

Read More

The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks By Rebecca Skloot

930 Words | 4 Pages

At times, doctors have to choose between the preservation and honor of a patient's dignity or to break ethical guidelines to help the human races’ health. A doctor who puts his patients’ well-being as his priority, usually respects the patient’s wishes. However, many factors influence a person’s decision to conduct an unethical experiment. In the contemporary biography, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot shows that scientists constantly discover and develop new concepts and procedures that help heal numerous people, despite the unethical experiments that they conduct on living organisms.

Read More

Chuck Klosterman My Zombies Myself Analysis

570 Words | 3 Pages

In the article “My Zombie, Myself: Why Modern Life Feels Rather Undead,” Chuck Klosterman explains how everyday life is like zombies and why they are so popular. Zombies are experiencing an up rise in popularity because they are being used in video games and television shows such as “The Walking Dead”. Zombies are becoming more interesting to watch because any kind of sound or smell of a living human draws their attention. For example, the sound of shooting one zombie attracts others zombies to the person doing the shooting. Zombies are becoming more popular because the audience are able to relate to them in numerous ways.

Read More

Mr Simpson Flu Shot Case Study

1199 Words | 5 Pages

If anyone disobeys his decisions then it would be a result of being unethical. Every intent of bioethics is the right to live one’s life the way they see fit, forcing Mr. Simpson to get the flu shot would not be right and lying to him about a placebo drug would not be right neither. Both of those options would be the wrong way to handle the situation. We could handle it in an autonomy way meaning that anyone have the right to make decisions without being interfered with their decisions. Everyone have their own right to make informed decisions, for example, their health.

Read More

Summary Of Should Doctors Tell The Truth By Joseph Collins

1354 Words | 6 Pages

In “Should Doctors Tell the Truth,” Joseph Collins presents an argument for why in some cases a physician lying to a patient is a justifiable action, as lying in some cases serves to benefit the patient’s health. Though a physician may certainly be justified in lying to a patient in some cases, Collins’ presentations of justifiable examples of lying do not demonstrate a dedication to achieve or to understand the patient’s best interest. Rather, Collins advocates for a model of the doctor-patient relationship that does not extend consideration to the patient’s autonomy nor to the patient’s expectation of privacy in order to form a paternalistic strategy of treating patients. Moreover, Collins’ position is not normative as it operates on knowledge that cannot be attained preemptively and relies on moral luck for its justification. Collins supports his argument for the moral permissibility of lying to patients by describing an interaction with his friend on a golf course.

Read More

Health Care Stakeholders Analysis

1010 Words | 5 Pages

They must ensure that they are providing adequate services to patients and at the same time ensuring that insurance companies are getting paid (Saint Joseph’s University, 2011, Para 6). Along with that they must secure that they are getting paid. Furthermore, physician moral and ethics are challenged as well; Thus, causing them to rethink how they take on their responsibilities as a medical care provider by trying to keep patients best interest, insurance companies interest and their own interests. This conflict with trying to meet the needs of several different stakeholders causes strain on the physician because they must walk fine line to please each. While trying to please a specific stakeholder another holder could be compromised.

Read More

The Four Main Ethical Theory Of Beauchamp And Childress

1167 Words | 5 Pages

(Cowey, 2012). By focussing on the four main principles, I will discuss autonomy, the right for the individual to make their own decisions regarding their health care treatment, which in this case will also involve a close connection with immediate family

Read More

(Dax) Cowart: The Conflict Between Beneficence And Autonomy

542 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of Donald (Dax) Cowart, one can determine that the conflict is between Beneficence and Autonomy. The doctors were morally right in choosing to treat Donald despite his autonomy by using the principle of beneficence. Firstly, doctors entire training is about how to save lives, so in a sense it is something they are morally obligated to do. Patients go to hospital in the hopes of being treated.

Read More

Ethical Principles In The Film 'Miss Evers Boys'

1121 Words | 5 Pages

The four core ethical principles that are called into question in the movie “Miss Evers’ Boys” are autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Autonomy refers to the right of the patient to function independently and the ability to self-direct. This means that patients are entitled to decide what will happen to them, and if deemed competent, they have the right to either consent to or refuse treatment. All nurses and healthcare personal would be required to respect the patient’s wishes, even if they do not agree with them. Beneficence is the core principle that refers to the act of ‘doing good’ and advocating for the patient.

Read More

Distributive Justice In Health Care

418 Words | 2 Pages

Ethical Complexity of Distribute Justice and Rationing Medicine is a practice based on moral standards applied to clinical values and judgments, also known as medical ethics. Ethical values consists of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and justice. However, these ethical principles are affected when distributive justice and rationing of health care resources are implemented “…in a world in which need is boundless but resources are not…” (Scheunemann & White, 2011, p. 1630). The historic Hippocratic Oath described the four main principles of medical practice and established a moral conduct for clinicians. Beneficence demands that health care providers develop and maintain skills and knowledge, consider individual circumstances of all patients, and strive for the patient’s benefit.

Read More

More about Chuck Klosterman Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document