ipl-logo

Civil Law Vs Common Law

716 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Similarities and difference between common law and civil law

SYSTEM.

The aim of this project was not to judge which legal system is better: civil law or common law. Each legal system may have some advantages and deficiencies which will discuss. If a foreign legal system has some advantages, why not merge them in the national legal system? In that way the resulting combining of the two legal systems can only improve their common goal of designing a fair and just legal system which can provide legal certainty and protection to all citizens and legal persons.

The civil law and common law systems are the results of two different methods to the legal process, even that their aim is the equivalent function. There are many circumstances where the identical legal term have distinct meanings, or where different …show more content…

In the civil law there’s a division of powers, where the legislator, legislates and the courts (judges) apply the law. The civil law lawyers start from legal codes contained in the legislation, and by the process of supposition, they make decisions concerning the actual case, where it is more inflexible because in the non-existence of a specific code for particular situation, the judges cannot produce new rules and consequently this can precede to injustice. Alternatively, in common law the main duty of the courts is to create the law, judges have somewhat greater flexibility to create an appropriate remedy (legal principle to cover wide range of areas, even those not specifically provided in written law) at the conclusion of the case. The lawyers in common law, compare the actual case with similar legal disputes that have been dealt in previously decided circumstances, and from this precedents they need to follow the doctrine of stare decisis. Common law can respond to cases, situations and facts that were not foreseen by legislators. Common law can examine and develop responses to real life situations. (Kenneally, A. and Tully, J.(2013) The Irish Legal system). Another main distinction between the two systems is the compulsory force of precedents. While in the courts of civil law, their main job is to decide on particular cases by using and decoding legal norms, in the common law their job is not only to decide disagreements between parties but additionally to provide assistance as to how alike cases should be resolved in the

Show More
Related
553 Words | 3 Pages

MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

The relationship between the law and society affects everyone and everything. How the law is written and how it is acted upon in society are two different things. It is imperative, therefore, that we as citizens pay attention to and understand the importance of the relationship between the law and society as it affects both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We engage in and witness the power of the law and society everyday. The law is personal, however, the law is also discretionary depending on where you look.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

There are ways to distinguish what your civil rights and civil liberties are. They have talked about them since they were put into place. Everyone seems to interpret them differently. I will first start off by saying civil rights and civil liberties have been debated and talked about in our government up to this day. They are still interpreting each part in our federalism government we have.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

People throughout America had different views on how to end segregation, as each state had its own background with segregation and slavery. Oklahoma although it prided itself on never being a slave state it still had segregation, from the 1920s to when schools and public places began to be integrated in the 1960s. In the earlier phases in segregation practices in Oklahoma you could find the Ku Klux Klan marching through downtown Oklahoma City, people recognized and supported the Klan. The Klan recruited Public High School students to join their patronage against the African American community. The segregation occurring within Oklahoma provided the African American community with many hardships, such as not being able to shop in many stores,

Read More
1420 Words | 6 Pages

Farha, Syed Govt 2305 02/11/2018 LIBERTY VERSES RIGHTS The differences and similarities between civil rights and civil liberties are so similar that they can intertwine. Both terms work together to give individual security, confidence and support. 1

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

In America, the judiciary has a legal system that helps solve any personal, economic, social, and political problems or cases. These cases are withheld in a court and presented to a judge and either a grand, petite, or hung jury to finalize their jurisdiction on the problem. In this essay, I will explain the structure of the Texas court system and their type of cases. To start, civil and criminal cases are two types of cases in this legal system. Civil cases handle private rights and remedies, personal injury suits, divorces, child custodies, or breach-of-contracts.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

There are unique differences from civil law and common law. Today, Civil law is used throughout western Europe, Latin America, parts of Africa, and the Far East. Civil law is also called Roman-Germanic, Roman Law, and sometimes Continental Law. Civil law is code-based.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

The aim of this article is to critically consider this proposition from a number of different perspectives. It will first describe the historical evolution of Equity and its connection with the Common Law. Then, it will go through to analyse why this proposition is partially correct by talking about how Equity is now more structured due to the presence of equitable maxims. This argument will be supported using a specific maxim that led to clearer equitable rules. Relevant case law will also be used for illustrating how this maxim is being used by the

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

In hard cases, judges are not legislating, as Hart’s positivists assert, they are inducing based on principle. Judges have a duty not only to apply the rules, but also to make sure that the legal system is consistent with the principles of the society. When judges are said to legislate, they are not making the rules but discovering them. [20] According to Dworkin understanding the role of the courts is to defend the rights of citizens from the likelihood of unfair rules or other circumstances in which the written laws do not satisfactorily defend their natural rights.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

An issue in theoretical basis on what should prevail or which is supreme between International Law or Municipal Law (national law) is usually presented as a competition between monism and dualist. But in modern approach there is now the theory of coordination or is also called Harmonization theory that rejects the presumption of the other two theoretical concept, monism and dualism. The monist view asserts the international law’s supremacy over the municipal law even in matters within the internal or domestic jurisdiction of a state. While it is true that the international law defines the legal existence of states as well of the validity of its national legal order, the dualist asserts the international law is an existing system that is completely separated from municipal or national law. That dictates the

Read More
1655 Words | 7 Pages

International laws are, by definition “A body of rules established by custom or treaty and recognized by nations as binding in their relations with one another” (www.oxforddictionaries.com). International law is a very significant topic because it affects everyone globally. In this research report, I would like to explore the advantages and disadvantages of international laws and consider if they should be enforced in all countries. The modern system we use today was developed in the 17th century in Europe and is still used worldwide (Stratton, 2009). After the Second World War, international unity became very popular (Neff).

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

In the article entitled ‘Determining the Ratio Decidendi of the Case’ by Arthur L. Goodhart, I underwent a roller coaster-like journey on exploring the science behind the nature of a precedent in English law. Goodhart started with the attempt to explain the full meaning of ratio decidendi in the simplest terms. He referred to Sir John Salmond’s definition in which I have interpreted ratio decidendi as the principle of law that is found in a court decision and possesses the authority to be binding. Ratio decidendi should be distinguished from a judicial decision, as the latter is a wider concept and contains the ratio decidendi, whereas the former is a principle that carries the force of law. In another reference, Professor John Chipman Gray

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Material Sources: Material sources of law includes: • Historical Sources: Suppose no statutes exist, then court refers to common law or case law. The principles or set of rules framed traditionally in an unauthorized or in an unofficial way, but are adopted and endorsed as rules, and decisions are made on them as well. Such sources are outlined as COMMON LAW OF EQUITY. The essential characteristic of common law is that it ascends as precedent. When the parties have disagreement on the law, then court looks for previous rulings and precedents on it.

Read More

More about Civil Law Vs Common Law

Related Topics

Open Document