Collaborative Testing Is Fair
Good Afternoon Erica, As you know I have worked here at the Cy-Fair campus for the past five years. I enjoy working with the staff and is always willing to help whenever possible. I have work hard to make sure that I am fulfilling my obligations to the students along with any other task that assigned to me. I enjoy my job and work hard to make sure that the Cy-Fair team is successful. What that being said I would like to ask if you could speak with Donna about her attitude towards me.
This is, in a way, a decision people face every single day. As a society,
The Choice of Life or Death Choosing between life or death is not a decision that you want to make. Of course pretty much everyone is going to choose life over death, but is some cases you don’t have that choice. In the article “Organ Sales Will Save Lives”, written by the author Joanna MacKay, she presents an argument about whether or not the sale of organs should be legalized. She builds her credibility by giving numerous facts, examples, and statistics on the argument. People die everyday waiting and hoping to get the call about finding a match for a kidney so that they can have a kidney transplant done.
I feel like Mrs. Bergmeier definitely took a utilitarian approach to her problem, as she pushed aside the moral thing to do, in order to generate the
What are the consequences of a particular choice? How may changes in decision-making environment affect choices?
It is also widely encouraged due to the belief that it will decrease the cost of
This is a prime example of how many people in society decide to make life-changing decisions that will negatively affect their
Smarter Balanced Assessment: Pro or Con? Smarter Balanced Assessment, who is it truly assessing, the teachers or the students? Smarter Balanced testing contributes to the teacher’s performance, but is it beneficial or does it have unintended consequences? Students are ultimately grading the teachers by taking these tests and they are not even aware of it. The disadvantages may outweigh the benefits for this topic, but teachers must look past the disadvantages and do what they were meant to do, teach.
Considering these pros into action, there are cons to it. Higher salary based on standardized tests will have negative effects. More manipulation of test results will occur within this. If school board officials are seeing that students are achieving higher test scores, they will take action and give teachers the bonuses, but what the school board does not know is that the teachers are the ones manipulating the tests for their own benefits in this case for money. “Cheating teachers are on the rise as figures show the number illicitly helping children pass GCSE and A-level exams has trebled in the past two years” (Turner).
It is also important to acknowledge the difference between unwise decisions (which a person has the right to make) and decisions based on a lack of understanding of risks, or an inability to weigh up information relevant to a
Recently, several states have adopted a new, computer-based form of testing. These tests, PARCC and AIRS, have been put in use. After the state recognized the downfalls of using these tests, and the students over-whelming distaste for them, they agreed to remove the PARCC from the requirements. However, they agreed to use another test from the same company who created the PARCC, Pearson. I think the important question is: If they can make a test as horrid the PARCC, from it’s careless set-up to it’s annoying need for students to take a second round two months later, is it really a good idea to force this state's students to take another one of their tests?
Even though students have been taking standardized test for decades, parents and educators are just now realizing that standardized testing could be harmful to students. Standardized testing has been a problem , causing controversy since the late 90’s and early 2000’s. Although standardized testing helps pinpoint weak spots and evaluate students progress, it can cause students to have mental health issues. Stress has been a top leading issue students have to face from standardized test for the past few years. Stress is a state of mental or emotional strain or tension resulting from adverse or very demanding circumstances.
In fact 70 percent of educators surveyed in 2015 say that tests are not developmentally appropriate. Furthermore many students suffer a great deal of stress because of standardized tests. What’s most shocking is that instead of lower income schools getting better after tests were implemented they have actually gotten worse. School could essentially be taught by robots. At this point most teachers in my district have to teach a curriculum that is developed by the state instead of their own curriculum.
In using the theory of preference utilitarianism, making decisions is much simpler. One does
There are certain repercussions that cannot be anticipated. They both help to clarify, make an informed decision. What one person does is not just for one person it can affect a lot of
More about Collaborative Testing Is Fair
Cy-Fair Team Work Case Study
310 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty
676 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Organ Sales Will Save Lives By Joanna Mackay
779 Words | 4 PagesMrs. Bergmeier's Ethical Dilemma In The Prison Camp
447 Words | 2 PagesNaked Economics Chapter 1 Study Guide
1208 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
1039 Words | 5 PagesMistakes Steve Made In Frankenstein
448 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Smarter Balanced Assessment
1005 Words | 5 PagesCons Of Standardized Testing Essay
543 Words | 3 PagesMental Capacity Act
1886 Words | 8 PagesStandardized Testing Persuasive Essay
426 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing To Students
994 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Speech On Standardized Testing
734 Words | 3 PagesPreference Utilitarianism Theory Analysis
1225 Words | 5 PagesPhysician Assisted Suicide Essay
1595 Words | 7 Pages