When has everything became about how well you do on a standardized test? (Interoggative sentence/rhetorical sentence) Okay students, today you’ll be taking the PARCC. Okay students, today you’ll be taking the AIRS. Okay students, today you’ll be taking the Explorer SAT. Okay students, I know you just took AIR and PARCCs, but are you ready for a round two? (Anaphora) And the point is, that is only freshman year. In Sophomore and Junior year, you’re future is decided for you. How well you do on your SAT, ACT, and PSAT determine what college you get into. Getting into college is no longer about character, hard work, or your actual grades. No. Now, it is about what you’re numbers are on two ridiculous and antagonizing standardized tests. The startling transition from middle school to high school panics and …show more content…
Recently, several states have adopted a new, computer-based form of testing. These tests, PARCC and AIRS, have been put in use. After the state recognized the downfalls of using these tests, and the students over-whelming distaste for them, they agreed to remove the PARCC from the requirements. However, they agreed to use another test from the same company who created the PARCC, Pearson. I think the important question is: If they can make a test as horrid the PARCC, from it’s careless set-up to it’s annoying need for students to take a second round two months later, is it really a good idea to force this state's students to take another one of their tests? Some supporters of these tests argue that the new computerized testing is better, however, the test day truly showed the hamartia of the test. When having a school as large as Hudson, with its 1,600 students, you might take a moment to consider what the effect of 1,600 students using the school’s minute network. If you guessed that it would take more than a half-hour-hour for all of them just to get to the system, you’re