ipl-logo

Communism Vs Proletariat Analysis

822 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Karl marx and friedrich engels essay

Bibliographic Citation:

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The communist manifesto: a modern edition. London: Verso, 2012.

Keywords or Phrases (3 people, places, things, or ideas-- do this as a hashtag # basically): • Proletarian
• Bourgeoise
• Class struggles

Thesis (paraphrased):

With the support of Communism, the working class (proletarians) can abolish the current class structure and create a stateless and classless society.

The major theoretical frame of this work is best explained as:

The COPE of this work seems to be:

Context- Spring of 1847 Marx and Engels joined the League of the Just and caused their renaming and restricting into the League of the Communists within a few months. “Convinced by their ‘critical communism’”, …show more content…

That the bourgeoisie vs. proletariat is another addition to the history books unless action is taken to break the chains.

Purpose or politics- Marx and Engels believe that the bourgeoisie created their own downfall when they created the subservient class of the proletarians. Throughout the constant bourgeoisie battles with those like the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie continually asks for the help and support of the proletariat and in doing so must pull them into the politics of their class. When the proletarians finally realize the power they wield they only can rise up and strike down the oppressing class of the bourgeoisie and free themselves.

Epistemology- Marx and Engels study this by posing, then answering the questions “Who would revolt?” and “Why would they revolt?” using class placement and oppression to be the justification for both …show more content…

I agreed with the theory of true equality as laid out by Marx and Engels because it rids society of greed and jealousy. Looking at today’s societal woes, we have people complaining all the time that rich people don’t pay enough in taxes while the middle class is paying through the nose. That the upper class is afforded privileges those in the lower classes would never be able to receive without outside intervention by the government or someone from said upper classes. With true equality and the needs of the main working class met, there would not be the same level of disdain or lack of opportunity between those who make a little more versus those who make a little less because the basic needs and wants are being met.

3. I question Communism in relation to the proletariat as set forth by this work, because Marx and Engels state “They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole.” Human nature, especially in politics, has a precedent for not following through with this claim. Initially the interests may be the same as the working class, but what should happen if some of the working-class interests are no longer beneficial to those in the Communism party? Would they uphold their claim that the interests of the working class are their sole

Show More
Related
990 Words | 4 Pages

The upper class, the bourgeoisie, were exploiting the lower class, the proletarians. Marx and Engel’s main argument is that the perfect society would have no class and everything would be shared. Both men looked at the Industrial Revolution in Europe and watched the owners of businesses keep wages high enough “to keep the labourer in bare existence as a labourer” (Marx, 28). Defeating the social system requires the working class to rise up and revolt against the bourgeoisie. Without the upper class, the workers would own the businesses, and could equally share the profit between themselves.

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx refers to the "proletariat" or the working class as the group with the most "class struggle". Marx defines the classes as 1) bourgeois, the "capitalists" who own the social production and employ the labor of others; and 2) proletariat, who sell their labor power to make a living but don 't own their own production. Marx argues that the wealth and prosperity of the bourgeois depends on the proletariat 's production of labor. Their products are sold for a larger value that the labor itself thus exploiting the working class and allowing the bourgeois to control the production. Marx states that the nature of these classes will inevitably result in conflict and revolution.

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

This document, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, discusses the ideology of Communism and how it will affect the relationship between the proletariats and the bourgeois. The manifesto summarizes the theories of Marx and Engels about society and politics and the idea that the capitalist society will eventually become communist. They claim that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles,” and that their policies will solve the problems of existing societies. (Part 1) With its appeal to logos and pathos, the manifesto seems very convincing, however, after closely considering the claims, the arguments gradually become more and more

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Danielle Giacinto Mrs. Park English-IIIA 8 March 2023 Rhetorical Essay In his critically groundbreaking I Have a Dream speech (August 28, 1963), Martin Luther King, Jr. eloquently speaks and passionately allures his audience through the use of allusions, appeal to emotions, and repetition to prove that racial discrimination is an injustice. King develops his argument by explaining the grievances that African Americans face and what must be done to eradicate the horrible actions against them. He gave this speech to create a sense of upheaval and need for justice in the people of America. One of MLK’s most useful methods of proving that discrimination based on race is an injustice is the use of allusions.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

Marx and Engels then follow with a series of rhetorical questions: “Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not been hurled back from the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries (1)?” Combined with the notion that holding power leads to corruption and immorality, the questions asked presents the reader with the impression that the communist party is being purposefully targeted by influential authorities. Marx and Engels further appeal to the emotions of their readers by adding that “The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has… left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”(4).”

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

Rather than advocating for the assurance of individual liberties, Marx and Engels argue that the government is justified in increasing its power to the point where their authority overrides personal liberties. Karl Marx says “the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” He focuses on the clash between classes in society and discusses how one class dominates another, which in the end suppresses individual freedoms. In the age where “the Civil War marked the transformation of an agricultural society into an industrial nation,” Marx saw a move towards capitalism, which he felt led to the exploitation of laborers and argued that Communism could put an end to that. Therefore, this document disproves the idea that unity was the solution to the protection of liberty, but rather argues that the elimination of class distinction would erase oppression among society.

Read More
1982 Words | 8 Pages

Marx and Engels said, “The executive of the modern state is nothing but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.” (Marx and Engels 1948) Marx, in his book, The Communist Manifesto, Marx argued that society is divided into two parts, namely the bourgeois and the proletariat. (Marx and Engels 1948) he explains that the bourgeois control the factors of production, and in order to earn and utilize the factors of production the proletariat has to sell its labour power to the bourgeois. He explains how the bourgeois exploit and take advantage of the situation of the proletariat for their own selfish gains.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

It is argued that social inequality occurs because of the conflict between the upper-class and the working-class, or as Marx defines it, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. Based on the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Marx and Engels, 1848), the divergence emerges because the aim of the Bourgeoisie is to obtain a surplus-value that is produced by the work of the Proletariat. On the other side, the Bourgeoisie provides the Proletariat with the minimum required, such as a place to live and a minimum wage, in order to keep the society under control and avoid a rebellion. However, Marx did predict a revolt of the working-class that would eventually lead to a communist regime. When it comes to applying this theoretical approach to reality, it is evident to notice that no global revolt in regards to capitalism has occurred.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

The idea behind this according to Marx is that history is a series of stages, defined by their mode of production and the struggle between classes: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. " According to Marx, the current historical stage is the capitalist historical stage. This is the conflict between the bourgeoisie (middle class) and the proletariat (working class). This theory is supported by the historical stages preceding the capitalist historical stage which can easily be defined by their modes of production and class struggle, or lack thereof.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engel focused on class conflict as the driving force for their argument. Throughout history, there is a common theme of a caste society lasting for so long until the mistreated lower class attempt to break the cycle; but that system is only replaced with a new

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx’s class theory lies upon the premise that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." He meant by this that ever since the inception of modern human society, people have been always divided into classes which are in conflict with each other due to class interests. An argument against class interests is that they are not given ab initio, they arise out of exposure of people occupying different social positions in varying social contexts. Karl Marx and Engels divided the masses into three broad classes, the proletariats, the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie.

Read More
1891 Words | 8 Pages

Marx saw capital and liberal democracies as the fundamental reasons for the low standards of living and the low social conditions of workers. Karl Marx in particular is especially concerned with the political assumptions behind these two ideologies. According to him, these two types of government should be replaced by communism, since communism would provide a more equal and socially just society. Although this statement may seem unusual, since we tend to associate communism with Stalin and China, the type of communism implemented in these countries is different from the communism that Marx and Engels envisaged in their Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels’ vision of communism is based on the principle of equality among the people and freedom

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

Capitalism, according to Karl Marx is divided into two major social classes: the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie, which is the minority of the class system, own the means of production such as land, machinery, factories and raw materials whereas the Proletariat, which is the majority of the class system, having no means of their own production and have to work to earn wage for a living. Karl Marx has his own theory that history is made up by class struggle which he mentioned in his book – Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1848) and had predicted that the Proletariat would lead a revolution to overthrow the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx believed that there will be intrinsic conflict like exploitation, alienation of labour and commodity fetishism between both of the classes.

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one

Read More

More about Communism Vs Proletariat Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document