Bibliographic Citation:
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The communist manifesto: a modern edition. London: Verso, 2012.
Keywords or Phrases (3 people, places, things, or ideas-- do this as a hashtag # basically): • Proletarian
• Bourgeoise
• Class struggles
Thesis (paraphrased):
With the support of Communism, the working class (proletarians) can abolish the current class structure and create a stateless and classless society.
The major theoretical frame of this work is best explained as:
The COPE of this work seems to be:
Context- Spring of 1847 Marx and Engels joined the League of the Just and caused their renaming and restricting into the League of the Communists within a few months. “Convinced by their ‘critical communism’”,
…show more content…
That the bourgeoisie vs. proletariat is another addition to the history books unless action is taken to break the chains.
Purpose or politics- Marx and Engels believe that the bourgeoisie created their own downfall when they created the subservient class of the proletarians. Throughout the constant bourgeoisie battles with those like the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie continually asks for the help and support of the proletariat and in doing so must pull them into the politics of their class. When the proletarians finally realize the power they wield they only can rise up and strike down the oppressing class of the bourgeoisie and free themselves.
Epistemology- Marx and Engels study this by posing, then answering the questions “Who would revolt?” and “Why would they revolt?” using class placement and oppression to be the justification for both
…show more content…
I agreed with the theory of true equality as laid out by Marx and Engels because it rids society of greed and jealousy. Looking at today’s societal woes, we have people complaining all the time that rich people don’t pay enough in taxes while the middle class is paying through the nose. That the upper class is afforded privileges those in the lower classes would never be able to receive without outside intervention by the government or someone from said upper classes. With true equality and the needs of the main working class met, there would not be the same level of disdain or lack of opportunity between those who make a little more versus those who make a little less because the basic needs and wants are being met.
3. I question Communism in relation to the proletariat as set forth by this work, because Marx and Engels state “They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole.” Human nature, especially in politics, has a precedent for not following through with this claim. Initially the interests may be the same as the working class, but what should happen if some of the working-class interests are no longer beneficial to those in the Communism party? Would they uphold their claim that the interests of the working class are their sole