ipl-logo

Communism Vs Proletariat Analysis

822 Words4 Pages

Bibliographic Citation:

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The communist manifesto: a modern edition. London: Verso, 2012.

Keywords or Phrases (3 people, places, things, or ideas-- do this as a hashtag # basically): • Proletarian
• Bourgeoise
• Class struggles

Thesis (paraphrased):

With the support of Communism, the working class (proletarians) can abolish the current class structure and create a stateless and classless society.

The major theoretical frame of this work is best explained as:

The COPE of this work seems to be:

Context- Spring of 1847 Marx and Engels joined the League of the Just and caused their renaming and restricting into the League of the Communists within a few months. “Convinced by their ‘critical communism’”, …show more content…

That the bourgeoisie vs. proletariat is another addition to the history books unless action is taken to break the chains.

Purpose or politics- Marx and Engels believe that the bourgeoisie created their own downfall when they created the subservient class of the proletarians. Throughout the constant bourgeoisie battles with those like the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie continually asks for the help and support of the proletariat and in doing so must pull them into the politics of their class. When the proletarians finally realize the power they wield they only can rise up and strike down the oppressing class of the bourgeoisie and free themselves.

Epistemology- Marx and Engels study this by posing, then answering the questions “Who would revolt?” and “Why would they revolt?” using class placement and oppression to be the justification for both …show more content…

I agreed with the theory of true equality as laid out by Marx and Engels because it rids society of greed and jealousy. Looking at today’s societal woes, we have people complaining all the time that rich people don’t pay enough in taxes while the middle class is paying through the nose. That the upper class is afforded privileges those in the lower classes would never be able to receive without outside intervention by the government or someone from said upper classes. With true equality and the needs of the main working class met, there would not be the same level of disdain or lack of opportunity between those who make a little more versus those who make a little less because the basic needs and wants are being met.

3. I question Communism in relation to the proletariat as set forth by this work, because Marx and Engels state “They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole.” Human nature, especially in politics, has a precedent for not following through with this claim. Initially the interests may be the same as the working class, but what should happen if some of the working-class interests are no longer beneficial to those in the Communism party? Would they uphold their claim that the interests of the working class are their sole

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

390 Words | 2 Pages

Marx and Engels then follow with a series of rhetorical questions: “Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not been hurled back from the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries (1)?” Combined with the notion that holding power leads to corruption and immorality, the questions asked presents the reader with the impression that the communist party is being purposefully targeted by influential authorities. Marx and Engels further appeal to the emotions of their readers by adding that “The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has… left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”(4).”

Read More

Poverty By Abraham Kuyper And The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

990 Words | 4 Pages

The upper class, the bourgeoisie, were exploiting the lower class, the proletarians. Marx and Engel’s main argument is that the perfect society would have no class and everything would be shared. Both men looked at the Industrial Revolution in Europe and watched the owners of businesses keep wages high enough “to keep the labourer in bare existence as a labourer” (Marx, 28). Defeating the social system requires the working class to rise up and revolt against the bourgeoisie. Without the upper class, the workers would own the businesses, and could equally share the profit between themselves.

Read More

The Working Class In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

192 Words | 1 Pages

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx refers to the "proletariat" or the working class as the group with the most "class struggle". Marx defines the classes as 1) bourgeois, the "capitalists" who own the social production and employ the labor of others; and 2) proletariat, who sell their labor power to make a living but don 't own their own production. Marx argues that the wealth and prosperity of the bourgeois depends on the proletariat 's production of labor. Their products are sold for a larger value that the labor itself thus exploiting the working class and allowing the bourgeois to control the production. Marx states that the nature of these classes will inevitably result in conflict and revolution.

Read More

Finding Fallacies In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

1524 Words | 7 Pages

This document, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, discusses the ideology of Communism and how it will affect the relationship between the proletariats and the bourgeois. The manifesto summarizes the theories of Marx and Engels about society and politics and the idea that the capitalist society will eventually become communist. They claim that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles,” and that their policies will solve the problems of existing societies. (Part 1) With its appeal to logos and pathos, the manifesto seems very convincing, however, after closely considering the claims, the arguments gradually become more and more

Read More

American Exceptionalism Analysis

1055 Words | 5 Pages

Rather than advocating for the assurance of individual liberties, Marx and Engels argue that the government is justified in increasing its power to the point where their authority overrides personal liberties. Karl Marx says “the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” He focuses on the clash between classes in society and discusses how one class dominates another, which in the end suppresses individual freedoms. In the age where “the Civil War marked the transformation of an agricultural society into an industrial nation,” Marx saw a move towards capitalism, which he felt led to the exploitation of laborers and argued that Communism could put an end to that. Therefore, this document disproves the idea that unity was the solution to the protection of liberty, but rather argues that the elimination of class distinction would erase oppression among society.

Read More

Comparing Marx And Engels In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

1982 Words | 8 Pages

Marx and Engels said, “The executive of the modern state is nothing but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.” (Marx and Engels 1948) Marx, in his book, The Communist Manifesto, Marx argued that society is divided into two parts, namely the bourgeois and the proletariat. (Marx and Engels 1948) he explains that the bourgeois control the factors of production, and in order to earn and utilize the factors of production the proletariat has to sell its labour power to the bourgeois. He explains how the bourgeois exploit and take advantage of the situation of the proletariat for their own selfish gains.

Read More

Ideas From The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels

1079 Words | 5 Pages

Foundations of Sociology (SOC10010) Mid-Term Essay: Question: ‘’Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.’’ Answer: In this essay I have been asked to discuss three main ideas from the ‘’Communist Manifesto’’, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. To do this I will summarise three main ideas from the text and critically analyse them.

Read More

Marx And Engels: The Three Main Ideas

759 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engel focused on class conflict as the driving force for their argument. Throughout history, there is a common theme of a caste society lasting for so long until the mistreated lower class attempt to break the cycle; but that system is only replaced with a new

Read More

Critique Of Capitalism In George Orwell's Animal Farm

847 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.

Read More

Karl Marx's Approach To Social Inequality

926 Words | 4 Pages

It is argued that social inequality occurs because of the conflict between the upper-class and the working-class, or as Marx defines it, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. Based on the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Marx and Engels, 1848), the divergence emerges because the aim of the Bourgeoisie is to obtain a surplus-value that is produced by the work of the Proletariat. On the other side, the Bourgeoisie provides the Proletariat with the minimum required, such as a place to live and a minimum wage, in order to keep the society under control and avoid a rebellion. However, Marx did predict a revolt of the working-class that would eventually lead to a communist regime. When it comes to applying this theoretical approach to reality, it is evident to notice that no global revolt in regards to capitalism has occurred.

Read More

The History Of Class Conflicts In Karl Marx And Engels

764 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx’s class theory lies upon the premise that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." He meant by this that ever since the inception of modern human society, people have been always divided into classes which are in conflict with each other due to class interests. An argument against class interests is that they are not given ab initio, they arise out of exposure of people occupying different social positions in varying social contexts. Karl Marx and Engels divided the masses into three broad classes, the proletariats, the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie.

Read More

Karl Marx And Liberal Democracy

1891 Words | 8 Pages

Marx saw capital and liberal democracies as the fundamental reasons for the low standards of living and the low social conditions of workers. Karl Marx in particular is especially concerned with the political assumptions behind these two ideologies. According to him, these two types of government should be replaced by communism, since communism would provide a more equal and socially just society. Although this statement may seem unusual, since we tend to associate communism with Stalin and China, the type of communism implemented in these countries is different from the communism that Marx and Engels envisaged in their Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels’ vision of communism is based on the principle of equality among the people and freedom

Read More

The Father Of Capitalism And Marxism By Karl Marx

1140 Words | 5 Pages

Capitalism, according to Karl Marx is divided into two major social classes: the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie, which is the minority of the class system, own the means of production such as land, machinery, factories and raw materials whereas the Proletariat, which is the majority of the class system, having no means of their own production and have to work to earn wage for a living. Karl Marx has his own theory that history is made up by class struggle which he mentioned in his book – Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1848) and had predicted that the Proletariat would lead a revolution to overthrow the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx believed that there will be intrinsic conflict like exploitation, alienation of labour and commodity fetishism between both of the classes.

Read More

Global Political Economy

1755 Words | 8 Pages

For Marxists, they focus on class as the most important actor in the global economy, rather than the state. Both Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx are the founding fathers of this theory and the ones that unleashed the conflict between the workers and capitalists. According to Engels and Marx (1848), the working class seizing power would bring about the resolution of this conflict. Marxist theory rejected the notion of individualism of liberal theory and embraced the collective nature of economic nationalist perspective. Marxists have however, rejected statism and instead choosing to focus on the significance of class.

Read More

Karl Marx And Class Conflict

1486 Words | 6 Pages

Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one

Read More

More about Communism Vs Proletariat Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document