Community Policing: A Community Analysis

The role of policing has been modified tremendously. According to Introduction to Policing: The Pillar of Democracy”, by Haberfeld M.R. (MAKI), Charles Lieberman and Amber Horning (2014), “The role requires that law officers secure a safe environment for citizens” (p.6). This notion of protecting and serving the community comes from the beginning of policing, locals would come together and share equal responsibility to protect each other and maintain order (p.28). Law officers have complete responsibility for protecting the general public, so with that, citizens than have very high expectations, they expect officers to be heroes in any situation and at the same time respect their constitutional right (Haberfeld et al., p. 6). As declared by

For one to really understand the importance of police relation with communities one much first understand the history of policing. The modern style of policing was inherited from the policing style of Great Britain. Haberfeld et al. (2014) found that “the Greek tribe was the first group of people to set up a police force where local would join together and share the ideas of security establish the importance of police relation with the community” (p. 30). Haberfeld et al. (2014) went so far as to suggest that “Augustus Caesar was the first ruler to make a distinct police force creating praetorian and separating the commanders of the army” (p. 32). As policing has evolved throughout the centuries, local citizens would obtain the responsible for enforcing the law known as the Frankpledge system (Haberfeld et al., p. 36). Haberfeld et al. found that “that the Frankpledge system was invented by the conquering Norman monarchy as a way of controlling the central government” (p.36). Within this system a group of ten families was put together known as a tithing and they were designated specific policing roles within the community. Another group known as the “shire reeve” was considered the head of the county, a term that we commonly refer to as sheriff (Haberfeld et al., p. 36). As you can

Police officers still have to serve and protect local communities, but due to the industrial revolution policing has improved tremendously. The industrial revolution made policing easier, now police officer had access to cameras, foot printing, DNA etc. which make catching criminals effortless. This type of amendment is nice for policing, however, as you recognize with positive there goes a negative. This massive gap that 's now established between the police and therefore the general society is now a possible hazard as a result of now the general population has no trust with the enforcement which trust is important to