In the 1790s two major parties dominated the political scene. Those parties were people who sided with Alexander Hamilton, known as “Federalists” while the people who supported Thomas Jefferson were the “Anti-Federalists”. During the conclusion of the table, it was quite evident that the Anti-Federalists were considered to be more liberal, or in a broader sense, Democratic than the other party at the time. This can be inferred through the notion that they supported France throughout the French Revolution because they hated Britain because they once controlled everything they did; while on the contrary, the Federalists, which consisted of mostly business people, supported Britain due to their importance in trades. They also were against the
Hamad yousef May 9 /2018 Homework 4: The US constitution gives only certain powers to the federal government while the rest of the authority lies with the state governments. In case of the clash between the federal and state laws, the federal law prevails. However, in case of a clash between the federal and state governments, the result can be a deadlock.
Unlike the Articles of Confederation, which gave more power to individual states which made them more as a separate country than a union. Which did not work really well. I propose that we need a strong federal government which could help order and regulate the state legislatures and create a greater system in order to raise federal money. With the constitution active, the government will always be separated into three branches. The judicial, executive and legislative.
This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.
Knowing that the distribution of power within government needs to be fair and just, states have their own laws and powers that fall under the U.S. Constitution. All state constitutions have common purposes and functions regarding the day to day relationships between government and people. The structure of a states government typically establishes a bill of rights, an executive branch headed by a governor, attorney general, a state legislature, state courts, including a supreme court. WC: 93 4) Local government has four classifications in which the state's constitution allows discretionary authority: the power to choose the form of government, charter and enact charter revisions, the authority to set employment rules, remuneration rates, employment conditions and collective bargaining, the power to exercise local self-government in a broad or limited manner and lastly, the authority to determine tax rates, borrow funds and other related financial activities. While local governments vary across the United States, they have far greater impact on the people than the federal government.
-There is an argument that the Federal system was recommended to the framers of the Constitution and is still used today. The Federal system unites the states under one nation without diminishing their separate administrations, state legislatures, and local patriotisms. What is good for one group of people or a political body is not necessarily good for another. -The Federal system creates a large, new country.
In this system, the state governments possessed most of the power and the national government was very weak. Forming the US Constitution so that national and state governments could share power. Since the signing of the Constitution, the division of power in the United States has been based on sharing power between the national government and individual state government, known as federalism.
In addition, the Senate has the power to control elections and dictate when and what manner they are to be held. The paper moves on to highlight the futility which accompany the rights provided to the states. The rights given to the states, such as appointing and training the military, do not allow the states to protect their own citizens or “enable a State to exist within itself if the general government should cease” (Antifederalist 39). The biggest grievance against the states is the loss of revenue. Under the new Constitution, states do not have sole control over property.
State constitutions grant powers that are no limited where the U.S. constitution’s main purpose was to limit powers. State constitutions often have longer documents, as said above; the U.S. constitution is a basic outline, where the state constitution has a more specific outline that acquires more documentation. The U.S. constitution has changed only 27 times over the past two centuries, where the state constitution has room for improvement and is always changing. The U.S. has a representative democracy system that rejects direct democracy as a form of government. The states however believed that those types of constitutional arrangements were simply obsolete and wanted to give the chance for citizens to have a chance to participate in the creating of laws.
We have federalism because it helps fix the problem of different opinions and interests found throughout the different regions of the United States. It does not always allow one majority opinion to rule over the entire country. I do think its efficient to a certain extent, it’s good that each state can have their own laws and constitutions because it focuses on the welfare of that specific population that resides in that state but issues arise when it isn’t always easy or clear in determining which powers the states should have and which powers should belong to the federal government. Overall I prefer a unified government because there are some issues that all states should agree on, without a unified government chaos would ensure. The civil
This current event is related to Federalism. Federalism distributes powers between state and federal government. This type of government is thought to be ideally suited to the needs of heterogeneous people. The Frameworkers of the Constitution wanted a government that was powerful, but not too powerful. They decided a central government without compromising the power of the state was necessary.
The Constitution provides not only the framework for how the state and federal governments are structured, but it also places clearly stated limits on their powers. Moreover “federal” refers to the two level system in US－national government and this of each state (they are 50 in total). Last but not least “republic” is a form of government in which the ultimate power rests with the people, but they exercise it through election of representatives.
In the war of who should have more power state or federal? I firmly believe the federal government should have overall power. Now, why would I choose the federal government? Well think about this when slavery was going on the federal government put it to a stop. Even though some states didn’t want slavery to end the federal government made it mandatory for all states to stop slavery.
The power is divided and shared among the national, state, and local governments in the means of federalism, which in our federal system the central, or national government has some special powers over all the citizens, the states have reserved powers, and the two share concurrent powers. For example, the Federal Government responsibilities would be to print money, declare war, and make laws necessary and proper to carry out these powers while the State Government issues bonds, collect taxes, and spend money for the general welfare. The federal and state each have its limited powers; however, the two also have its concurrent powers which are to borrow money, issue licenses, permits, and certificates. In my opinion, the Constitution in Federalism
Designing or amending a state’s constitution often follows some general principles. Part of the principles of constitutional design is that the state’s constitution should not be too specific on issues. In addition, constitution should consider long-standing tradition of government over time. It should set rules
