ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The American System Of Checks And Balances

974 Words4 Pages

Introduction The American system of government emerged as an experiment in liberty and democracy back in 1776. Since then it has proven to be quite adaptable and flexible. Although the United States are primarily associated with democracy, the more accurate categorisation would be constitutional federal republic. As regards to its legal definition, “constitutional” means that the government in the US is based on a Constitution (which is the supreme law). The Constitution provides not only the framework for how the state and federal governments are structured, but it also places clearly stated limits on their powers. Moreover “federal” refers to the two level system in US－national government and this of each state (they are 50 in total). Last but not least “republic” is a form of government in which the ultimate power rests with the people, but they exercise it through election of representatives. …show more content…

Being such, it defines three separate branches of government－legislative, executive and judicial; their powers and different types of procedures related with them. Perhaps one of the most intriguing characteristics of the document is the system of checks and balances, designed to distribute power among the three branches. Each branch exercises some form of power over the others. For instance, justices of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President, but the Senate must give his consent first. Similarly, the judiciary (in the face of the Supreme Court) can deem as unconstitutional laws passed by Congress and signed by the President, leading to their nullification. Thus this system is created in order to ensure that no single branch of government exceeds the limits of its

Show More
Related
207 Words | 1 Pages

Which means no branch could have more power than another. (Document C) That keeps us from having a tyrant, the leader of government with absolute power. Another way that the Constitution guarded against tyranny is with the small state- large state concept.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Because the separation of powers was created, there need to be a way for no branch to become too powerful. With the checks and balances system, “each branch

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

This keeps the legislative and judicial branches of government under checks because it allows the president to stop anything unjust from happening; they can also choose who not to nominate as a judge if that nominee doesn't fit the executive branch's

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

The three different branches of government helped guard against tyranny. They helped guard against tyranny because each branch has different people in it and that means that not all of the same people are making the laws and enforcing them. Now they have multiple people creating the laws which decreases any chance of tyranny. With the three different branches of government comes the sharing of power which also helps guard against tyranny. If they all can come together and share all of the power than we can have a government successfully without having any problems with tyranny.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

According to James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788 (Document C), “[The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.”. The diagram (Document C) shows ways the branches can check each other’s power, for example, “Congress can impeach the President and remove him or her from office”, “The President nominates judges”, and “The court can declare laws unconstitutional.”. Checks and balances protect against tyranny because the three branches can check each other’s power to prevent one branch from having too much power. Checks and balances also make sure that each branch relies on each other, as if one branch did not exist, then the system would not work at

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

The united states is described as a federal democratic republic because we aren't ruled by any kings or queens like countries such as the united kingdom, Netherlands or morocco etc. a president is elected to run the country by the people. A federal government is a type of government made that includes states or provinces and the central government has some power to individual areas. Other countries that are a federal republic are Mexico, Germany, Argentina, Ethiopia and Switzerland . A federal democratic republic gives states the opportunity to make some decisions and control over their activities.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

This is very effective because it prevents one branch from getting too much power and becoming a

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Answer: The U.S. Constitution includes checks and balances between different branches of the federal government to ensure that a branch won't become too powerful and overuse its authority. One example of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches is the Presidential veto. The executive branch has the ability to veto legislation that is passed by the legislative branch. But the legislative branch can overlook a presidential veto if they decide to use a ⅔ majority vote in the H.O.R. and the senate. This makes sure that the legislative process cannot be abused by the

Read More
385 Words | 2 Pages

The United States has a democratic government, which means our citizens get to help choose how our country works. The Constitution is setup to include citizens in the law making and voting process and preventing the US from turning into a tryannical government. Three ways we do thi s is by using Federalism, Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Federalism is a system our country uses to make sure power doesn’t stay in one area (Doc A). This method gives specific responsibilities to Central Government and each state.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Three branches have the power to execute create and judge how long should be applied. However, the founders wanted to add something. They didn't want one branch to gain more power than the other so I created something called checks and balances. As the text, ¨Roman influence on American

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The system of checks and balances that were developed by the creators of this document prevents any one part of the government from gaining too much, or absolute power. With the construction of the legislative, executive, and the judicial branch it greatly changed how the government runs by dividing the government into three branches, giving each branch equal power over each other. Votes were based on equal representation within each state so smaller states would have an equal say as much a larger state. Creating a more fair government that regulates not only the people but the government itself was critical to the success of the

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

In a federal model, power is divided between a central government and several local governments according to the constitution. The democracy of the United States functions on the foundation of majority rule, compromise, citizenship, and free enterprise system. We have a Constitution based federal republic meaning that the people elect agents who make and carry

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

The United States government is best defined as a federal constitutional republic. As a constitutional republic, the U.S. government is organized by the Constitution, setting forth the political threshold of the people, which are known as the federal and state governments. As a federal republic, the control stands by the people throughout the voting process of electing the federal and state officials. The federal government is limited by the distribution of authority within the states as outlined in the Constitution. Although many people like to call the United States a democracy, this is not the case, because the public does not directly control legislation.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The American System Of Checks And Balances

Related Topics

Open Document