“It does not really match up to the book. The effects are cool, but it does not add up to the novel. I was literally screaming at the TV because of everything that was different… 5. The war was supposed to start and end in a second.” This quote is a review over the movie by “the little nightmare” There were a lot of differences from Fahrenheit 451 book and movie too. Personally, the book was better. The way that the book portrayed the characters and how everything just went together, the book flowed better. Out of all the differences in the book and movie like no Mildred, hound, or faber. I think that there was something that completely ruined the movie for me. The biggest change I did not like was that there was no war. Yes, in the book it was in the background most of the time. Eventually it showed up more. You cannot just take a war out of life. The war helped show what will happen or could happen. …show more content…
A war can start and end in a day now. Another significant about not having the war at the end of the movie is that now they cat rebuild the city. In the book after the nuclear bomb hit the city all the railroad people went to go and start to rebuild everything. They also were going to go everywhere to help the rebirth of places. They are going to make a new society. Also, when the bomb hit Montag remembered an important part of his life that he did not remember. He remembered where him and Mildred had mt. when they took that out of the movie it showed that he did not change as much as he had in the book. They also had Montag die in the movie so you cannot see him or any of the railroad