Federalists supported the constituion and wanted a strong elected government. They believed that a powerful national government was needed so that the nation would be protected and to address domestic issues. Federalists also believed that the Constitution should be allowed to place limitations on the powers of each branch of government. So therefore, Checks and Balances
The Federalists wanted a strong national government to provide order and protect the rights of the people. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists, which included many patriots, such as Patrick Henry and John Hancock, opposed ratification because the Constitution shifted the balance of power
United under the articles of confederation federalist and anti federalist strongly believed in liberty and freedom but there were more differences than similarities for example, Federalist and anti federalist had very different ideas on how the new nation of America should have run. federalist wanted a strong central government to fix the weak system of the Articles Of The Confederation and strengthen the nation as a whole, while anti federalist wanted a weak central government, so they could continue to have the power that made up their economy and regulations in each state. During the Revolutionary the founding fathers need to show the people and other nations that they were prepared to fight for America's freedom in a orderly and
Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.
The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.
Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.
If a government became too strong, liberty would be destroyed. Anti-Federalists also did not agree on the Federalists framework for the Congress. They thought there would be too few representatives in Congress to represent the great diverse views of all
The Federalists want a strong government and strong executive branch. The Anti-Federalist oppose the Constitution. They didn’t want to give up any of their state's’ power. The Articles of Confederation are a written document that establishes a function of the national government in the United States. The Constitution is saying that we people are guaranteed certain basic rights, have a national government and have fundamental laws.
The Federalists thought that those whom were not wealthy were uneducated and unqualified to make decisions for the country. They believed that the poor had no right to make decisions, that they would not make rules to protect one’s property as they did not have anything worth protecting. James Madison felt very strongly that the government should protect one’s property. Then Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison wrote 85 essays in one year.
However, just because they were not in favor of the Constitution, did not make them unpatriotic or tyrants. The Anti-feds wished for a weaker federal government, in which the states had more power. This ideology of a greater amount of state power was derailed by the Articles of Confederation’s failure. It failed because the federal government was too weak. Ultimately, the Federalists reigned supreme
The Anti-Federalists insisted on keeping our government the same because it was. This suggests that the government would be a monarchy and hostility towards the government would build up if it were to happen. A strong central government was wanted by the Federalists as well the constitution to be sanctioned as fast as possible without any editing. Federalists additionally supported the idea that some power should be taken from states and placed into the government, as well as the division of 3 branches of government.
The debate for a strong versus weak central government was a prevalent issue in 1787 only years after becoming an independent country. Young America was struggling how to best rule the country while representing the people. With past disastrous events with the English tyranny and the more current issues with the articles of confederation, our country’s ruling became a heavily debated topic. The main fear of the anti-federalists was that the national government would have too much control preventing the people from expressing their rights. The federalists saw the faults in the Articles of Confederation and knew there had to be more of a national control.
Anti-federalist commonly refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government. Many of those people that were Anti-federalist were typically the lower end of the small towns. Antifederalists didn’t believe in a stronger government mostly because there state governments could more easily protect their rights. The federalists were the complete opposite of the antifederalists. They felt the need for a strong central government to regulate over the U.S. rather than having it ran through each state governments.
Federalists vs. Antifederalists “The decision of the Philadelphia Convention to submit the Constitution to state ratification conventions meant that Americans from all walks of life would be drawn into a wide-ranging public debate about its merits. The Constitution was subjected to an unprecedented level of public scrutiny; every clause of the document was parsed and analyzed. Some writers approached this task soberly, invoking the classical republican tradition by adopting pen names such as Brutus or Publius” (Cornell, 2012). The Federalists are individuals who are supporters of the constitution and whom like a centralized government.
I am in Favor of the Anti federalists because we need to know that the citizens are well protected, especially those who are not as wealthy as others since, in a national government, only wealthy citizens would be able to act. In addition to that, if we go through with a federal government, they will not be able to insure safety, ensure an equitable amount of freedom, or a bill of rights, which is necessary for a constitution. A bill of rights is needed for the constitution in order to protect the citizens against the power of national government. If there was to be a federal constitution, the wealthy would have a say in the argument but the other side would not if they were not wealthy. A Bill of rights is needed in order to protect ordinary
