Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
Federalists are folks that agreed with the Constitution while anti-federalists disagreed. The federalists wanted a strong natinal government so the nation could be protected. Anti-federalists thought that a strong executive could become a king and similar to a monarchy. Both sides relied on Virginia's vote to raitfy the Constitution, and little states to follow behind, so it could go into effect. New Hampshire was the final state to vote and the Constitution went into effect, so the people celebrated on a day known as the 4th of July today.
The Federalists wanted a strong national government to provide order and protect the rights of the people. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists, which included many patriots, such as Patrick Henry and John Hancock, opposed ratification because the Constitution shifted the balance of power
United under the articles of confederation federalist and anti federalist strongly believed in liberty and freedom but there were more differences than similarities for example, Federalist and anti federalist had very different ideas on how the new nation of America should have run. federalist wanted a strong central government to fix the weak system of the Articles Of The Confederation and strengthen the nation as a whole, while anti federalist wanted a weak central government, so they could continue to have the power that made up their economy and regulations in each state. During the Revolutionary the founding fathers need to show the people and other nations that they were prepared to fight for America's freedom in a orderly and
Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.
The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.
There were less anti-federalists than federalists because more people wanted equal people in the government and more unification of the country than not. The Constitution gave organization to America because the nation or federal government had more power than the state
The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.
Those who supported the Constitution were known as Federalists, while the opposing side were termed Anti-Federalists. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and strong leaders (like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin), while Anti-Federalists consisted mostly of farmers and lower class citizens (such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry). The Federalists simply could not believe the virtue of man was a strong and reliable enough foundation for a government, so they rooted for a structure of checks and balances. They levied for a strong, central government that contained the majority of the power over the states. Anti-Feds believed such a government would create a tyranny, so the states should retain most of the supremacy.
The Federalists want a strong government and strong executive branch. The Anti-Federalist oppose the Constitution. They didn’t want to give up any of their state's’ power. The Articles of Confederation are a written document that establishes a function of the national government in the United States. The Constitution is saying that we people are guaranteed certain basic rights, have a national government and have fundamental laws.
Anti-Federalists are those who are against the ratification of the Constitution because, they fear having a strong national government that would overpower the states. They are mainly state’s rights advocates as they remain loyal to their state governments. Additionally, they are generally poorer than the Federalists. Anti-Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation was a good enough plan that did not need any modification. They believed the Constitution lacked the protection of basic political rights, and did not give any significant power to the states.
Their belief was that the government would have too much power. The Anti-Federalists were satisfied with the way the Constitution was. The Anti-federalists thought that states should have more rights, that there should be a Bill of rights. They
During the construction of early American policy, two distinct political factions formed in regards to the Constitution. These factions were divided by their different belief in how power should be balanced among the federal government and state government. Those in support of the U.S. Constitution, were titled Federalists. These Federalists desired a strong central government, supreme over the states. On the other hand, those opposed to the Constitution were called Anti-federalists.
The Anti-Federalists insisted on keeping our government the same because it was. This suggests that the government would be a monarchy and hostility towards the government would build up if it were to happen. A strong central government was wanted by the Federalists as well the constitution to be sanctioned as fast as possible without any editing. Federalists additionally supported the idea that some power should be taken from states and placed into the government, as well as the division of 3 branches of government.
Anti-Federalists didn't want a strong federal government meaning no president and practically no one to tell them what to do. The people who supported this side largely lived in rural areas. Federalists wanted a strong federal government, with strict laws and regulations. These people lived largely in urban areas. People that supported anti-federalism were Thomas Jefferson,
Federalists vs. Antifederalists “The decision of the Philadelphia Convention to submit the Constitution to state ratification conventions meant that Americans from all walks of life would be drawn into a wide-ranging public debate about its merits. The Constitution was subjected to an unprecedented level of public scrutiny; every clause of the document was parsed and analyzed. Some writers approached this task soberly, invoking the classical republican tradition by adopting pen names such as Brutus or Publius” (Cornell, 2012). The Federalists are individuals who are supporters of the constitution and whom like a centralized government.
More about Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
Similarities Between Checks And Balances
423 Words | 2 PagesFederalism Vs Ratification Dbq
138 Words | 1 PagesDifferences And Similarities Between Federalist And Anti Federalists
318 Words | 2 PagesDifferences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists
622 Words | 3 PagesExplain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesConstitution Vs Constitution Dbq Essay
758 Words | 4 PagesArticles Of Confederation Dbq Essay
585 Words | 3 PagesRoger Sherm The Ingenious Idea Of The Great Compromise
1606 Words | 7 PagesPros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
619 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution
521 Words | 3 PagesArticles Of Confederation Institutionalized Essay
1783 Words | 8 PagesThe Articles Of Confederation's Failure Of The Federal Government
515 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
488 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
133 Words | 1 PagesCompare And Contrast The Antifederalisists And The Federalists
576 Words | 3 Pages