(other wise known as the poor) The leaders of the Antifederalist were people like Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry. Although the leaders held more power and wealth than the people who followed them, Henry was notorious for fighting for individual liberties, such as a Bill of Rights. Which was one of the Antifederalists main objectives because it would give them basic liberties. The AntiFederalists were also scared of the power a central government would have.
The argument between the Federalists and the Antifederalists principally centre on the Artivles of Confederation-Consitution. The Federalists and the Antifederalists have thier interpretions wheather the fedel government necessarliy exits or not. The Federalists believe that the relationship between fedel government and fifty states governments is stable and helpful. In contrast, the Antifederalists oppose this political struture and democratic goals, so that they think that the exitence of fedel government suppose to get corrupt. On the other hand, the Federalists and the Antifederalists also have different views about slaveries.
The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.
The Anti-Federalists were a political group who did not support the Constitution and a
Those who supported the Constitution were known as Federalists, while the opposing side were termed Anti-Federalists. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and strong leaders (like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin), while Anti-Federalists consisted mostly of farmers and lower class citizens (such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry). The Federalists simply could not believe the virtue of man was a strong and reliable enough foundation for a government, so they rooted for a structure of checks and balances. They levied for a strong, central government that contained the majority of the power over the states. Anti-Feds believed such a government would create a tyranny, so the states should retain most of the supremacy.
Led by Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, and Patrick Henry, the antifederalists were mainly supported by small farmers, small landowners, and
According to Saul Cornell, the struggle between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist over the constitution is one of the “greatest political struggles in American history”. (Cornell, 2012) From what I gather the men who were called the Anti-Federalist are the real Federalist because they cared about the rights of the people and wanted to protect them from an all-powerful government and give more power to the states to care for their own people. They believed that citizens should be included in decisions and that when they weren’t included into decision making procedures the government would become detached from their citizens. (Borowiak, 2007).
Let me start with what Antifederalist are: The Antifederalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. In the approval debate, the Anti-Federalists conflicted the Constitution. Anti-federalists complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights.
One side needed a more grounded government to keep a solid union (Federalists); the other needed a more agrarian republic in view of intentional assent and neighborhood administration (Anti-Federalists).
However, just because they were not in favor of the Constitution, did not make them unpatriotic or tyrants. The Anti-feds wished for a weaker federal government, in which the states had more power. This ideology of a greater amount of state power was derailed by the Articles of Confederation’s failure. It failed because the federal government was too weak. Ultimately, the Federalists reigned supreme
The truest definition of Anti-Federalism is a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US Federal Government, and also later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. After reading both sides, the opinion of this writer would be swayed towards being an Anti-Federalist. They wanted to make improvements, while working to put more power into the hands of the states while giving more authority to state governments. The Anti-Federalists knew it was necessary to add the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which is now the Bill of Rights, These are the personal rights that are enjoyed by all citizens today. Much to the opposing side, Federalist were in favor of a strong central governments.
Some people are in favor of the Constitution, some are against it. They are federalists (in favor) and anti-federalists (against). Though there is one major difference, there are more things we can compare and contrast. Federalists believed that, without a Constitution, America might crumble.
These people are known as federalists and antifederalists. The federalists are the people that support the constitution. These people believe that the constitution is the best way for the country to prosper. It is the only way to make sure this country stays the way it is. On the other side of the argument are the anti-federalists.
Anti-federalists considered the will of the people, and the Anti federalists were accurate in their views
While the Anti-Federalists were normally poorly educated and not in favor of the constitution and believed a Bill of Rights should be added. The Anti-Federalist also did not believe in having a strong federal government, and instead believed the power should be with the people. As men from the thirteen states arrived in Philadelphia, they faced many pre-existing obstacles due to the failure of the Articles of the Confederation, “The failure of the Articles of the confederation made it clear that America needed a new form of government.” The colonists had designed a weak document because they were fighting for freedom against an already strong government. However, once they achieved their goal they realized they needed to correct their mistake.
