ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Frederick William And Louis Xiv

539 Words3 Pages

Two great rulers of the 16th-17th century, Louis XIV and Frederick William, once paved their way into becoming a perfect example of how absolutism could turn out. Either in ruin, or prosperity. Louis XIV was the King of France, in which he praised so much his divine power as a King. On the other hand, there was Frederick William who aided the creation of the militaristic power, Prussia. These two rulers were idolized for their prosperous intellect and unique decisions when it came to governing their region. However, they did it in very different ways. Louis XIV was one of few rulers that praised the idea of divine power; this means that he was chosen by god to rule all of France and lead them alone into the future. That began his absolutist …show more content…

Like the “Sun King”, Frederick was able to tax the various provinces of Prussia, without retaliation, in order to build up a fund for the military expansion. With the fear of further foreign invasion, his tax profits increased dramatically. One by one, Prussian Provinces became one big state in which Frederick William was in charge of. Thus an absolute monarch. The nobles power declined, the absolutist nature seized over the government and Frederick William passed on his secrets of financial support and military tactics to his son, Frederick William I. His son kept the Empire going without any further trouble, unlike Louis XIV’s children. Therefore, the absolutist reign can either end in ruin or further expansion. The way Louis XIV responded to the challenges of his state led him to lead France straight into debt. However, Frederick William’s patience and relentless taxing allowed for a better outcome when it came time that he fixed the issues within his state. This allowed for a better future and and ensured pathway to success for the empire of Prussia. In the end these rulers showed their own beliefs and values in ruling alone, which determined the outcome of their reign, but those ethics and ideas passed onto the modern day world. We still consider their ideas valuable in understanding how things work in the government

Show More
Related
375 Words | 2 Pages

Locke’s ideas have given Frenchmen the courage to fight against the strict government. During the reign of Louis XIV, nobles’ power was strictly limited. By making the nobles live in Versailles, Louis could easily watch over his nobles. Later, Louis XVI took over the throne. He raised taxes then spent the money in whatever way he pleased (Doc 5).

Read More
1380 Words | 6 Pages

(Doc.6) King Louis XIV was selfish and discourteous. King Louis XIV pernicious reign caused his kingdom to be monetarily unstable and damaged. Unlike King Louis XIV, Frederick the Great not under

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

He had many wars that he fought in order to increase his land. He grew the country the France with these wars. By growing the land that France owned he increased his power by increasing the amount of people he ruled over, and also gained the respect of the people making it easier for him to be an absolute

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

Eastern and Western European countries had many differences on economics and political structures. Both the East and the West tried to achieve an absolute monarchy, which can be described as a type of government where the monarch has complete rule over everything. Although both had an absolute monarchy at some point, they were structured differently and one much more successful than the other. In Eastern Europe the members of nobility had almost all of the control over the poor peasants who lived in their community.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Louis XIV was a very conceited person. He thought that everything and everyone should revolve around him. Louis XIV led an absolute monarchy in France. He called himself “Sun King” because he thought that everyone and everything should revolve around him. He made sure that he had absolute power over everyone and no one else had a say in what happened.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

By weakening his nobility, Louis XIV had to ability to make sure anything that happened in France was under his control. These nobles did not even have to ability employ someone without specifically asking their king for his permission. An example of his authority over French nobles is shown in a meeting he once prevented from occurring

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

In addition, they used these mercentalic goals to strengthen their central power through specific strategies in their interests at their home countries. Through passing domestic policies, they strived to assimilate national networks of powerful individuals who would work for the benefit of the state and would then be rewarded with privileges. Abroad, they both tried to expand their territories as means of enhancing their economic benefits, which would eventually add to their centralized political powers at home. The formation of Prussia and Russia, during the seventeenth century, marked a development for the modern Western world as it would later lead to the formation of powerful states. “Absolutism,” was a process by which kings Peter the great and Louis XIV, tried to expand their powers, through ways that

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

France became decentralized state and the nobility with their titles became powerful and the authority of the king became less effective. The powerful noblemen were constantly challenging the authority of the king. This form of government was established in the early 16th century when Louis the XII was in charge because The French kings constantly trying to restore their royal powers from their nobles and this was very important process to make France a centralized state. When Louis the XII’s son took over power.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

During the 1600s and 1700s a new type of monarch emerged known as an absolute ruler. Some of these rulers were Louis XIV, the Fredericks of Prussia, and Peter the Great. These rulers believed that a monarch had a divine right to rule and should only listen to God. All these rulers had characteristics that defined them as absolutists. Louis XIV was constantly at war during his reign which resulted in a powerful army.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Post Thirty Years war left France looking for a new leadership style that would give plenty of stability. What France received was Louis XIV, who would reign under the new absolute monarchy government. During Louis’ reign, divine rights controlled rank in society. This left many confused on why they were picked to be at the bottom of society, and why the king was given his power. Jean Domat, a royally appointed juror by king Louis helped explain a better understanding of the new system of governance to the people of France in his writings.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

In 1789, France was precariously balanced on the edge of chaos. King Louis XVI was ruling monarch of France. King Louis’ youth depicted him as reckless, thoughtless, and unwise. A series of bad financial and political decisions, lead to his unpopularity among the people of France. King Louis was young, distracted and misguided.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Peter the Great and Louis XIV were both the greatest rulers of their times. Both of them were autocrats having unlimited power and on the contrary both of them were absolutists. Louis XIV was the ruler of France and nicknamed “The Sun King” and Peter the Great was the ruler of Russia. Although Peter the Great and Louis XIV has some different successes, they had several noticeable similarities such as power, buildings, and armies/economical growths. Peter the Great and Louis XIV had similar successes in their famous buildings.

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

King Louis XVI, who was the ruler at the time, was a main contributor to these problems that led France to its downfall. The country had a massive lack of resources and food, which led King Louis XVI to borrow more money than he could afford, thus putting the country in immense debt. Despite the very visible crisis overthrowing the country, the king was incapable of accepting his mistakes and refused to change his ways. He maintained the unjust voting system, known as the Estates-General, and worsened the taxing system in order to pay off his debts. The people, especially those of the Third Estate, were clearly angry and dissatisfied with the state of the country, which led them seek out a movement for what was right.

Read More
2000 Words | 8 Pages

At the age of twenty-three Louis XIV of France declared his determination to be what he referred to as ‘real king’ – to become the sole and absolute ruler of France. To achieve this he invested himself in establishing a meticulous routine, but never did the king view his duties as a toil as his belief was that it was the primary duty of a royal prince to always present himself as noble and composed. Willing in his search for glorification, Louis spent his lifetime creating a magnificent and grand spectacle at the court of Versailles. The self-proclaimed ‘Roi du Soleil’ believed wholly in the theory of absolute monarchy and consciously spent his years embodying the spirit of the sun, and employing countless displays of spectacle which frequently

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

The concept of leadership was prevalent in the ancient world. It had a place in the way the people of ancient times governed their lives. Greece, and especially Athens, is the cradle of democracy in the western civilization. Athens owes the first penal and civil law code to Draco. An outstanding statesman and poet called Solon acted in Athens at the same time as Draco.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Frederick William And Louis Xiv

Related Topics

Open Document