ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King

1026 Words5 Pages

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were civil rights leaders trying to give equal rights to African Americans during the 1960s. Both men had ideas involving changing schools, affecting the economy, and retaliating when being discriminated against. Malcolm X's philosophy included segregated schools, black nationalism, and taking a violent approach to end the discrimination of African Americans. Martin Luther King's philosophy consisted of integrating schools, boycotting the economy, and taking a nonviolent approach to the segregation African Americans faced. Both had separate ideas but went about them in very different ways. Martin Luther King's philosophy makes the most sense and was most accepted by people in the 1960s as it enabled both African …show more content…

believed in boycotting businesses as a way to be taken seriously instead of using violence. The text states many of King's nonviolent protests revolved around economic tactics. He took to heart the saying, “‘If you want to hurt a man, hit him in his wallet.’ The Montgomery Bus Boycott, the sit-ins, and the S.C.L.C. campaigns in various southern cities were all designed to inflict financial pain on the white business community. Businesses would then put pressure on the local political authorities to revise their segregated laws.” Boycotting businesses brought change to the civil rights movement. Many businesses lost money because people would not purchase products from businesses that would not hire African Americans. To combat their loss of revenue, businesses had to make changes and hire African Americans. This brought about the lessening of segregation because African Americans and whites started working together more. Malcolm X's vision of economic policies was based on community. He wanted African Americans to support one another and believed in black nationalism. Malcolm thought, “...people must take control of their destiny, empower themselves and not rely on outside forces for help. He was very concerned if black Americans simply demanded more jobs and higher pay at white-owned businesses, then the structure of the economy would not change enough.” This way of thinking did not help gain any trust or foundation but created more of a divide. Also, Malcolm X´s policy technically would take many years to implement, using just African American products and money to fund their

Show More
Related
809 Words | 4 Pages

Civil rights for African Americans are beneficial for the United States as a country either using violent or nonviolent methods to achieve this goal. African American civil rights have been fighting for over many years and the most used civil rights movement's methods have been by non violence used by Martin Luther King Jr. and violence used by Malcolm X. Dr. King and Malcolm X both respected civil rights movement leaders have used violence and nonviolence to their advantage to achieve the goal of African American civil rights. Both respected leaders conducted many acts to achieve the same reward with contrasting methods, even with Dr. King is Christian and Malcolm X a Muslim. America should have confronted the inequalities of the 1960’s by creating a peaceful protest and movement, but if civil rights and peace for are not given, then violence protests should take place in a certain amount of time.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Basic to the philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil. There is nothing quite so effective as a refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and institutions which perpetuate evil in our communities.” (Martin Luther King Jr’s “Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom” Document F) This supports the claim that Martin Luther King Jr didn’t preach violence, only retaliation. By attacking the economy but not attacking people or communities.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites.

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

He wanted peace with everyone in their community and wanted to protest agasint violence. Instead, Malcolm X's method was to create employment for their own community. Not only that, he wanted his community to learn how

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

However, there was a difference of opinion from two prominent leaders of the civil rights movement on how to bring about the desired change. Martin Luther King Jr. was of the mind that boycotting and peaceful protest was the solution to a better economic condition; alternativly, Malcolm X believed that the situation would be solved more effectively by keeping black commerce exclusivly within black communities. While both viewpoints have similarities and individual merit, I tend to favor that of Rev. King.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

" Malcom X did not like how African Americans were being treated in America, It was a problem and he realized that and knew it needed to change. In relizing this, Malcom X decided to fight for a change for African Americans in America as in paragraph 5 Malcome x stated, “I don't see an American dream I see an American nightmare" Malcolm X would not stop until change happened he did care what it took including violence, Malcolm X would never ask for a fight, but he would never back down from one in paragraph 7 Malcolm X stated “It'll be Molotov cocktails this month hand grenades

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

While the two had a common goal of ending racial discrimination and achieving equality, Martin Luther King Jr. has the better approach of nonviolence and peaceful resistance. King explains his approach in a way that would be the best solution to problems confronted by the Black community, as in Document 5, He states, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.” His strategy of nonviolent resistance, which included boycotts, sit-ins, and peaceful protests, put pressure on political leaders and the public to address the systemic inequalities faced by black Americans. This is deemed to be successful as his approach lead to the passage of landmark civil rights legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King’s views helped create a better environment for every race and I really think his political views and strategies were more efficient than Malcolm

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

During the civil rights movement in the 1960’s two amazing leaders appeared armed with ideas, hopes, and desires that will change the way of life for an African America. The two men were Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. Both wanted the same price but they had different means in getting that same price. Although both men had some amazing and truthful points, only one was the most convincing to me. The most convincing to me was Dr. King. Dr. King was convincing to me because of the way he talked to the people, and thought them to lead a nonviolent civil rights movement.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

His life was very focused around civil rights. Malcolm X preached black supremacy and he felt blacks were treated unfairly as many civil rights leaders did. For starters, Malcolm X was a loyal minister and spokesperson for the NOI, also known as the Nation of

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Focusing specifically on the opposition of racial segregation, The Civil Rights movement symbolized the need for change across America. Between the years of 1950 and 1960, events such as; the March on Washington, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, speeches, protests, and sit-ins, directly defined such opposition. Due to such events, two outstanding leaders of their time, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X emerged into the public eye and began to impact the Civil Rights movement. At a turning point of the century, the two men took charge and became icons across the world while resonating significantly with African American minorities. With such in mind, the two men had extreme differences in their morals, ideals, and religions; however, both deemed

Read More
1602 Words | 7 Pages

The occurrences mostly served as attention gatherers for the issue, but usually resulted in a negative impact and impression for the people trying to gain freedoms. Those who wished to not cause harm and where discouraged by violence would steer away from Malcolm X’s philosophy, and would find guidance in the practices of another civil rights leader of the time, Martin Luther King

Read More
143 Words | 1 Pages

Malcolm X believed that a violent approach to activism for the African-American community would benefit them by instituting the idea of "reverse racism" and solely African cultural appreciation. This concept would preach that one could do whatever it took or by "any means necessary" to embrace the African culture in each and everyone of the African-Americans. Malcolm X had a radical view that instead of integration to mix the blacks and whites that it was best to keep segregated. If any whites tried to shame or blend with the Africans cultural pride he advocated to defend your personal heritage. Malcolm X thought this was the best tactic to combat integration which then led him to create the Black Power Movement and allowing him to strongly

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King

Related Topics

Open Document