ipl-logo

Comparing The Views Of Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X

656 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparing malcolm x and martin luther king jr

In recent months, the debate over civil rights has once again been brought to the forefront. The call for change has not been this loud since the 1960s. At that time, it was widely agreed that there needed to be economic change in the lives of African Americans, as they were paid less than whites and often denied jobs altogether due to the color of their skin. However, there was a difference of opinion from two prominent leaders of the civil rights movement on how to bring about the desired change. Martin Luther King Jr. was of the mind that boycotting and peaceful protest was the solution to a better economic condition; alternativly, Malcolm X believed that the situation would be solved more effectively by keeping black commerce exclusivly within black communities. While both viewpoints have similarities and individual merit, I tend to favor that of Rev. King. …show more content…

belived that marching and boycotting were the key to obtaining more favorable economic conditions for African Americans. He believed that the best way to fight racism is not to cooperate with it; rather, he called for peaceful resistance. Reverand King stated that when you cut into the profit margins of businesses by boycotting those ones that do not provide equal paying jobs to members of the black community, it becomes the economic necessity of those businesses to provide those jobs in order to maintain their income, thus improving the economic conditions of the black community, a view that milllions took to heart and instigated around the country. I personally agree with this position on the basis that blacks and whites working side by side would erase many false pretences between both concerned parties, and lead to a greater understanding of each other. This, in turn, would lead to an understanding that we are all equal as human beings, and the work of one is worth the same as the work of the

Show More
Related
102 Words | 1 Pages

Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in only using non-violence in his activism. He used methods like peaceful resistance and non-violent protests. King was already known for organizing and carying out civil rights protests peacefully in the south. I think Kennedy also changed his mind because he saw the success King had already made while working with the SCLC and he knew that it might hurt him politically if he got in the middle of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr's type of activism would have been a much better choice to allow in Washington than the type Malcolm X used.

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

Not all leadership styles are the same, especially when supporting different messages. A perfect example would be Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, as both were great leaders of the Civil Rights Movement but both supported different ideas, and with different ways of supporting those ideas. In his “I Have a Dream” speech at the March on Washington in 1963, Dr King had a very optimistic and inspirational tone. He used things like imagery to support the idea of reaching racial equality through integration instead of segregation. Dr. King grew up living in a very loving and stable home.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

King’s theological perpectives about love and non violence has separated him not only from white Christians but also from the African Mmerican separationist communities ;and especially, Malcolm X. Many African Americans welcomed King’s notion of non-violence as a practical strategy for achieving constituional rights for the black community. However, Malcolm X strongly rejected both King’s religious and practical views on nonviolenec, and insisted that that violence when “necessary” and self-defense are basic human rights for protecting both black individauals and black societies. One of the main theological points that reflected on the extrem contradictions represented in these two figures, was King’s notion of nonviolence and the Malcolm

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

During the 1960’s, Martin Luther King Jr. had the best philosophy compared to his counterpart, Malcolm X. They both have different methods of solving racism and having civil rights for black Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights peacefully and nonviolently. Malcolm X on the other hand, wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights by any means necessary.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

“You can murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder.” says a bright mind known as Martin Luther King Jr. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both victims of racism, violence, and social prejudice. Both wise men had philosophies that they lived by and preached with all their hearts. What philosophy between the two men was best during the 1960s?

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X took two very different approaches to the civil rights problem in America. Whilst they both wanted the same thing which was to improve the rights and lives of the African Americans they believed the best way to achieve this was different. Martin Luther King took to peaceful marches and protests. Malcolm X on the other hand encouraged resolution by any means necessary. Both of their approaches were necessary to fix the problem.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

The civil rights movement in the south was a crucial turning point in American history, major changes occurred in the life of African Americans living in the south because of civil rights leaders who desperately wanted racial equality. Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X were two major advocates who spoke out against the racial injustice happening in America at the time. Their speeches influenced millions of people across the country, however they worked differently to achieve their objectives. Martin Luther King Jr., was born in January 15, 1929 in Atlanta, Georgia. His father was a minister and major influence in the choices King would make later on in his life.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

While the two had a common goal of ending racial discrimination and achieving equality, Martin Luther King Jr. has the better approach of nonviolence and peaceful resistance. King explains his approach in a way that would be the best solution to problems confronted by the Black community, as in Document 5, He states, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.” His strategy of nonviolent resistance, which included boycotts, sit-ins, and peaceful protests, put pressure on political leaders and the public to address the systemic inequalities faced by black Americans. This is deemed to be successful as his approach lead to the passage of landmark civil rights legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

American citizens during the 1960’s were either completely for desegregation, or completely for segregation. There was no middle ground between the two. The Civil Rights Movement was reinstituted after the Brown vs. Board of Education supreme court case declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students were unconstitutional. This gave a new, and vigorous offense, to the African American community in their fight for independence. With the conclusion of the Brown vs. Board of Education case, a new, modern era of equal rights initiated and two leaders emerged as the front runners.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.

Read More
1144 Words | 5 Pages

The upsetting part of the discrimination and disorder started in the Southern states. Civil rights subject became the standard throughout this period. Two of the most important leaders of the civil rights struggle were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Even though both of these leaders had the same termination outcome in mind, their method, thoughts, and concepts differed. The main contradiction became attached to their desired ness to use or not to use violence to set their

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

During the Civil Rights, blacks are not being treated equally. Members of the black community were denied jobs, and if given a job it was the lowest paying available which drove them to be upset. Two men by the names of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X took it into their own hands and gave speeches telling how things can get resolved. They both wanted blacks to not only have equality, but they also wanted justice for the members of the black community as well as jobs. These men were trying to make change happen.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. followed his Christian faith and believed that African American’s should gain their rights in a peaceful manner without any violence occurring. He thought that this was a technique that would force whites to confront segregation laws. This made many white people to support him and join the protests. He wanted African Americans and whites to work together in a society in which all races get along with each other and have the rights for all facilities. During his most famous speech that was in Washington the “I have a dream” it made him become an American icon which made everyone look at each other for who they are and not their color, which meant that segregation was coming to an end.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Focusing specifically on the opposition of racial segregation, The Civil Rights movement symbolized the need for change across America. Between the years of 1950 and 1960, events such as; the March on Washington, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, speeches, protests, and sit-ins, directly defined such opposition. Due to such events, two outstanding leaders of their time, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X emerged into the public eye and began to impact the Civil Rights movement. At a turning point of the century, the two men took charge and became icons across the world while resonating significantly with African American minorities. With such in mind, the two men had extreme differences in their morals, ideals, and religions; however, both deemed

Read More

More about Comparing The Views Of Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X

Related Topics

Open Document