More handpicked essays just for you.
Slavery between the north and south colonies
Slavery between the north and south colonies
Slavery between the north and south colonies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Edwards voices the drastic growth in production and new inventions in the North, but points out the South’s struggle with keeping up with the drastic growth. It is clear Edwards wanted reader to fully understand that the South was struggling greatly after the war and because of it the North led the Industrial Revolution. Edwards focuses around the following question: What does the South do to reestablish itself and become economically stable again after facing an overwhelming loss agriculturally? Edwards use of evidence to back up her argument of the South’s struggles after the war and the lack of reconstruction make it a reliable statement. Her evidence includes groups such as Ku Klux Klan and the Republican corruption to be main evidence to why the South was behind the rest of the nation.
Throughout the Civil War, as well as the 1860’s as a whole, it was evident that United States was sparsely growing, in industrial goods, the production of agriculture, and the spread of settlements. At this time, the United State’s population was more than double than its previous period. At this time the United states population was Approximately 31,443,321 million citizens (Joseph C. G. Kennedy, The Eight Census; 1864). In this time period we see most of the United State’s economical growth coming from the Midwest as well as the Northeast. As for the South, they remained rather agricultural, due to the desire of one of the biggest crops to ever support the United States, Cotton.
The north and the south had many differences based on their economy. The main thing that set them apart was their difference in climates. Document one says that the South had climate ideal for agriculture while the North was not able to grow crops year round. Because of this, the North leaned more towards industry and all of this lead to the clear difference between their economies. Since their economies were so different, their workforce was also.
The economies during the Civil War of North and the South very highly contrasted each other, but social and economic differences weren't moreover the rationalization of the South's
The North centered its focus on manufacturing and industry. Whereas, the South valued slavery and farming. According to the chart in Document 2, “Yearly Value of Manufactured Goods North: $ 1,500,000,000, and the South: $155,000,000 “. As shown the North was making way more money in the years, while the South was making approximately $1,345,000,000 less dollars than the North. In addition according to Document 1 it states, “ There were way more railroads in the North than in the South.
The South became a crop-based society that depended on the cheap labor of slaves. The North became a manufacturing and trading society that had saw slaves as helpful, but not absolutely crucial. Further into the future, this difference would drastically affect the Americas, through racial tension and ethical dilemmas. It would become a huge part of the civil war’s cause, a war that irrefutably shaped today’s world. All of these implications arose simply from the fact that the Northern colonies adapted to their environment in a way that did not require workers whereas the South adapted differently, demanding slave
The North’s and South’s economies were based on two different types of work. The Southern economy was based on agriculture and free labor, while the Northern economy was based on industry. The need
There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.
Sierra Andreas Ms Scott 1 - 3 - 2023 AP US History Unit 5 Guiding Questions and Terms Economic development came after territorial expansion, and it made regional tensions between the North and South worse. In the North economic development pushed towards industrialization, the creation of a market system, and a transport revolution. These economic developments flourished due to the high amount of immigrants moving into the area. The South however, was very different as it continued its growth of slavery and the cotton economy. The white landowners of the South pushed for less laws surrounding slavery and the African American slaves were forced to deal with hardships pertaining to their family, religion and the suffering from slavery .
The South was offended by the North. The North had prominent economy. Northern states based their economy on trade and manufacture goods. Document 3 states, “ the North’s economy came to depend more on trade than on agriculture.” Document 5 also inform how cities in the North grew promptly, the railway system, and the shipping industry.
During the early 1760’s the North and South both had similar cultural ideas like religion, language, owning slaves, and having farms. But then the North realized slavery was wrong. According to document 3 it states “ The South thus quickly established a rural way of life supported by an agricultural economy based on slave labor ... The North's economy came to depend more on trade than on agriculture”(Doc.3). The North and South cultural differences was the reason why the Union divided.
The residents of the North desired a more powerful and centralized government with more government control and bigger banks. On the contrary, the people of the south wanted a weaker federal government and wanted more power given to the states. The reason these differences existed were due to the different industries that the North and South focused on. The South was heavily focused on farming and produce to sustain their economy. This meant that they required cheap manual labor.
Industrialization transformed the North in various ways economically, politically, and particularly socially. After the War of 1812, the South expanded its agricultural empire while the North invested in various internal improvements and became a more widely industrialized market society. Embracing economic progress, the North invested in domestic factories as well as commercializing agriculture to participate in the new market system emerging in the region rather than developing self-reliant farms as in the South. One of the largest factors contributing to the industrialization of the North were the various forms of transportation that increased the abilities and effectiveness of economic participation throughout Northern states. The formation
“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.
The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and
