ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights And Anti Federalists

880 Words4 Pages

Anti Federalists were the people that kept individual rights still today. They did not like the Constitution and wanted all the power to be held within the states. The anti federalists felt that a strong national government threatened people and state’s rights. Federalists opposed the Articles of Confederation, they wanted a strong national government under the Constitution. The people thought the Constitution needed to be ratified, by adding the Bill of Rights to protect people’s rights and freedoms. The Bill of Rights is still used today, and it is added because of the Antifederalists to show a fear of a strong national government, a desire for limited government, and the need for protecting basic freedoms. The Bill of Rights shows a fear of a strong central government because the people did not want another government that is …show more content…

The eighth amendment shows how to limit the power of the government by having no harsh punishments and excessive bails. The amendment explains, “Excessive bail shall not be required… nor cruel and unusual punishments.” This shows that limiting the government gave people to not have punishments or bails that are excessive. This was added by the Anti federalists because it protects people’s freedoms but also limits the power of government unlike Great Britain when they controlled. The second amendment shows how people have the right to carry and bear arms at any time. The second amendment shows, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms.” This shows that Anti Federalists wanted to protect themselves by having this right. This also limits the power to the government because the people feared of another king and didn’t want to government to get in control too much. The Bill of Rights explains how there is a limit of government from the people and it explains to protect basic freedoms to

Show More
Related
622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

Read More
1982 Words | 8 Pages

The bill of rights was created because of a conflict between the Anti-federalists and federalists. The federalists agree that a bill of rights was required. The purpose of the Bill of Rights was to protect the rights of citizens. It guaranteed them their freedom and to keep the government from becoming too powerful thus giving the congress limitations.

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

They believed it was essential that individual rights were explicitly stated so that citizens were informed and could defend their own liberty (Cornell, 2012). The Federalists initially believed that a Bill of Rights was not necessary, as the states retained any rights and powers not explicitly granted to the federal government. Seeking to get the Constitution ratified, the Federalists agreed to write a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights Institute, a non-profit foundation that aims to educate students, explains: The Bill of Rights is a list of limits on government power. For example, what the Founders saw as the natural right of individuals to speak and worship freely was protected by the First Amendment’s prohibitions on Congress from making laws establishing a religion or abridging freedom of speech.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

When our founding fathers first created the Constitution it was found unworkable and had to have some changes before the ratification. In that process people began to have some differences such as the Federalist saw that the enhanced Constitution alone would protect all basic human rights. While Antifederalist saw that we needed an extra addition to the document that would genuinely give the basic rights, liberties, and limit the government from denouncing these rights and liberties from the people. The Bill of Rights was a necessary addition that has and will continue to protect the people from injustice in the government with the help of the Supreme Court.

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-Federalists were correct that a Bill of Rights was necessary to guard citizens from tyranny. To begin with, the Constitution is the framework for the organization of the U.S government and for the relationship the federal government with the states, citizens, and all people within the nation. When the United States was being born, the Founders adopted the first constitution to the nation called, Article of Confederation which created a central government that did not have much power and most of the power were given to the state government. However, the Article of Confederation was not working because there was no chief executive, no court system, and most important that was the central government could not force a state to pay taxes.

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

They stop the national government from interfering with the essential rights and civil liberties of citizens and they also accentuate how limited the national government’s power is. For instance, Amendment I guarantees the freedom of religion, Freedom of speech where the government cannot interfere with people’s personal beliefs. Another common amendment today is the 5th amendment which gives people the right to choose not to testify in court if they feel their own testimony will incriminate them, it also protects citizens from being subject to criminal prosecution and punishment without due process and protects people from being tried for the same case twice. Government’s power is limited through the bill of rights through the 3rd amendment which requires the owner’s consent when it comes to housing troops in their private homes which was something that was problematic during the American Revolutionary war. The Bill of Rights were added to the constitution due to the fact that citizens were unhappy because the constitution did not list the basic civil liberties of citizen’s and their individual freedoms.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

The first ten Amendments are the Bill of Rights. The first Amendment is freedom of speech, press, religion and petition. Which mean that congress can not make a law that prohibits the freedom of speech, the right for people to assemble peacefully, or to petition the government. The second Amendment is the right to bear arms. This gives the right for every citizen to carry weapons and the government can not interfere with this right.

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

But the most important piece is the Bill of Rights. The idea of adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution was originally debated because the Constitution, as written, did not enumerate or protect the rights of the people; rather it listed the powers of the government and left all that remained to the states and the people. The Constitution was

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt. , however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights gave Americans basic rights as a citizen of the United States and showed them that the government can’t take away these natural rights. Without the Bill of Rights, the government could do whatever they wanted to the citizens because the Constitution did not state the rights of the American people. To conclude, the new Constitution created more flaws than benefits for Americans. Although it did help America unite as one nation, it also could’ve fixed simple errors that we have today. The new Constitution made the national government too strong, it gave the President too much power, and it didn’t include a Bill of

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

The bill of rights adds to what the united states constitution says about personal freedom and rights. One of the amendments says that everyone should have freedom, religion, speech, press, assembly and petition. This fits into today because without this amendment there would be no freedom people would be told what to do. People could not say or believe in what they wanted to. The second amendment says people should have the right to bear arms.

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights was a bill created by Anti-Federalists to make sure the population of America had protected individual rights. The bill of rights is made up of Amendments, these amendments could show the limited government that was wanted, protecting basic rights, and a fear of a strong central governments. First of many things represented by in the Bill of Rights is limited government. In Amendment four it states that national government can’t do anything to your property with proper warrants. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,” this amendment, amendment four in the constitution, also says that a warrant can only be issued by specific things needed to search.

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights is significant to American history because it guarantees certain rights and liberties of the people. Also without its creation the Anti-Federalists in 1787 wouldn’t have ratified the Constitution. Without ratification the Constitution would not have gone into effect. The Bill of Rights also guarantees that personal freedom would be broad and the power of the federal government is limited. Without the written rights the government could take them away.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights And Anti Federalists

Open Document