ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Cosmological Argument Of Design

992 Words4 Pages

The Cosmological Argument and the Argument of Design are two philosophical theories that attempt to provide evidence for the existence of a higher power that created the universe. The Cosmological Argument is based on the idea that everything has a cause or a reason for its existence. On the other hand, The Argument of Design is based on the idea that the universe is too complex and intricate to have happened randomly and must have been designed by an intelligent being. Both theories have similar aspects but still differ in multiple ways yet still remain a valid philosophical theory. Moreover, the cosmological Argument seeks to establish the existence of God based on the idea that the universe must have a cause or explanation for its existence. …show more content…

For example, a flower exists because it grew from a seed, and that seed existed because it came from another flower, and so on. This chain of cause and effect can be traced back through the universe's history, but ultimately, a first cause or explanation must start everything. According to the cosmological Argument, God must be the first cause or explanation. Moreover, the Argument holds that God is the only being capable of producing something out of nothing; therefore, this must have occurred when the cosmos first began. Hence, the universe's existence is proof that God exists. The first significant objection about the cosmological Argument that appeared is about the is that it is based on a theoretical assumption of the existence of a first cause. This assumption is that the universe must have a reason and that the cause of the universe must be an uncaused, eternal, and all-powerful being. Unfortunately, this assumption is not based on any scientific evidence and is, therefore, open to …show more content…

This analogy is flawed, and the natural world is much more complex and dynamic than a machine like a watch. For example, living organisms are capable of adapting and evolving in response to their environment, which is not a characteristic of a machine. In addition, various unpredictable and chaotic phenomena that are not the result of deliberate Design can occur in the natural world, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and volcanic

Show More
Related
590 Words | 3 Pages

Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.

Read More
296 Words | 2 Pages

I think William Lane Craig made a strong argument when it came to a cosmological argument. He does have a point that there is an explanation of how the world came to be but there is more to it, such as dates and things like that. He says that the ultimate question in philosophy would be “why does anything exists”? He brings up that atheist think that the universe is eternal but he says there is reasons why the universe began. He says its obscured to think that its number of past events is infinite, which he says leads to self-contradictions.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

The Design Argument The question of whether God truly exists has been debated between believers and non-believers for centuries. Also known as the Teleological Argument, the Design Argument argued by William Paley states that there are so many intricate details and designs in our world that there must be a creator. In addition, it also argues that this world could not have been created by chance alone due to the characteristics that make it the perfect condition for human life to exist (Pecorino). In this essay, I will be giving a brief overview of what the Design Argument is, then providing evidence and reasoning in favor of the argument, then addressing the criticisms of the argument, then comparing both sides of the argument, then finally

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

The first premise of my argument is, there has never been the case in our lives were a thing was the efficient cause of its self. This premise says that nothing can be the cause of itself and thus it cannot have existed before it has existed. An example is a cup made of plastic, the cup is not its first efficient cause since it cannot create its self. The cup was created by a human who is the first efficient cause, he used a machine and plastic which are intermediary causes leading to the ultimate cause, the plastic

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

The teleological argument, or otherwise known as the argument from design and the intelligent design argument, is a philosophical theory put forward by William Paley with its final premise of proving that god exists. The argument includes a handful of elements, however close to the fringe yet within the margin, of logic in order to assist the facilitation of accepting the premise as a truth. As we examine the argument, and its implications in the context in which it was given, we can begin to see the boundary of logic become veiled and intuition and assumptions start to interpose. The teleological argument is most commonly started with a supposition parable dealing with a watch, so lets start out with that. Suppose you are walking down along a river and along the way you spot something in the dirt.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

If god doesn’t cause my existence, then I am caused by myself, my parents or a lesser cause. There is no infinite regression, so I my existence isn’t caused by my parents or lesser cause, Therefore, God is the cause of my existence (AD 51). As well I am not God, If I created

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

In philosophy, there is an argument called the teleological argument. It can also be called the design argument, and it basically states that if something has order and therefore design, then there has to be a designer. The argument goes like this, “1. The world exhibits design. 2.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

So the first cause argument proves that God does not exist assuming the first cause argument is sound then there must be some other cause because it is not God. In summary the notion of omnipotent is a miss-name because it implies the potency, power, causality when in fact all that it does is imply logical entailment, it implies that if it wills something you can deduce from the statement that something exists, you do not need a causal step, it is a logical deduction and therefore the first cause argument argues from causes in the world

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

The cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

This theory only eliminates the design arguments that are based on the creation of living

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Pg. 63). The general principles of a cosmological argument are: effects have causes, things happen and things exist for a reason, it’s trying to explain things, and all our sciences, studies, and lives are based on it (McGowan, Michael. N.p.). During Josh Wheaton’s speech in defending his belief, he uses this type of argument and talks about the Big Bang. He talked about how in the 1920s, Belgian astronomer and theist, Georges Lemaitre, said the entire universe jumping into existence in a trillionth of a second, out of nothing, in a flash of light, is how he would expect the universe to respond if God were to actually utter the command in Genesis 1:3, “let there be light”.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

I will start my points in this argument by, first, opposing the evidences and reasons why we should believe that God exists and second, by pointing one of many reasons why we should believe that God does not exist. In opposing

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

In this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Cosmological Argument Of Design

Open Document