The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan had many similarities and distinct differences. The New Jersey Plan wanted the Legislative Branch to consist of one house with equal representation from all states. It also stated that the Legislative Branch could collect taxes from the states. The Virginia Plan included details about a powerful Legislative Branch. There would be two houses with membership proportional to the state’s population.
The Virginia plan is a draft in the Article of Confederation, an proposal by James Madison. Because Virginia is such a large state, it needed 2 houses of the house of representatives to determined the proportions of the populations meaning there should only be House of Representatives with no Senate when it comes to decision making. On the other hand for the New Jersey Plan its the other way around, due to the smaller population of New Jersey, all representation where equal to other states. So for New Jersey plan there would be Senate but there wouldn't be any House of Representatives. To summarize the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan, the Virginia would involve the House of Representatives but not Senate and for New Jersey plan
Tyler: Milk is North Dakota’s official state beverage, and grows more sunflowers than another state. 4. Andi: Maryland’s state cat, the Calicio, shares three colors with the state flag. 5. Luna: Connecticut was home to the first hamburger and the first lollipop making machine in 1908.
Delaware’s individual income tax system consists of six brackets with a top rate of 6.6%. The top rate ranks 17th highest among states levying an individual income tax. Delaware’s state and local tax collections per person were $1,283 in 2013, which ranked 10th highest nationally. In the 1500s, the Spanish brought peaches to Delaware.
Student’s name Professor’s name Course number Date The Virginia and New Jersey plans 1 The Virginia plan had various characteristics as proposed by Mr Randolph. He suggested in accordance to the wishes of the committee that the national government should be created and that it should consist of a supreme legislative, Executive and Judiciary. According to Mr. Patterson in the Virginia plan which he drew from Mr. Randolph’s propositions, proposed that revision of the articles of confederations was paramount in order to render federal constitution adequacy to the demands of both government and the union in preservation.
There were two major plans for government submitted by the states: the Virginia plan- A.K.A the Large States plan, and the New Jersey Plan- A.K.A the Small States Plan. The Virginia Plan was made to specifically benefit the large, slave-holding, southern states. It called for a bicameral legislature which would take a state’s population into account when selecting the number of senators and representatives for a state. This would have given massive power to the southern states which had large populations due to slaves as opposed to the free, northern states. In reply to this was the New Jersey Plan, which was unicameral and gave equal representation to each state regardless of population.
When making a national government, two plans were proposed, the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan. The new Jersey plan proposed to have three branches (legislative, judicial, and executive), but the legislative branch would be elected by each state, regarding size. The judicial branch would be appointed by the executive branch, who would be appointed by the legislature. These factors are made considering New Jerseys size. At this time period, many states thought that that size and population meant a lot towards the national government.
Massachusetts and Nevada are different in many ways when it comes to their government. From the number of terms one is able to serve in a certain position to the qualifications to become a voter both states have their own way of running themselves. It’s interesting to see how states governments can vary when it comes to local government and political parties and support programs for their residents. In Nevada, the Governor of the State of Nevada is the highest state office.
I believe that the Virginia plan is much wiser than the New Jersey plan because it was proportional, or corresponding in size, to the population in state. The best plan is this one because it has two legislative houses (Bicameral), the Senate and the House of Representatives. We each get to vote for the representatives we want. The New Jersey plan only has one Legislative house (unicameral) and it only gets one vote for each state this is what deprived the smaller states from equality. The New Jersey Plan had so many disagreements that it had to appoint a “grand committee” and then it was known as the Great Compromise (An agreement between two or more sides in which each side gives up what some of what it wants).
How the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan Effected Representation The idea of equal representation has been debated many times throughout the history of mankind. But equal representation is often not feasible without compromise which is exactly what happened in Philadelphia in the year 1787. The representation that was being questioned was how the small and large states could both be represented equally, and it is not shocked that both the small and large states had a plan of how the representation should work. “The one plan was federal, the other national,” (105)
But the states cannot deny any taxes levied by the government. Also the government has the right to declare war, but the states cannot.
The United States uses many different governance styles. California’s style has much diversity and a very large size. The size has led California to a more complex system. The California government has had many issues in their healthcare, transportation etc. This leads to California's model being more complex than any other state.
It would be unfair for the small states to be taxed as much as the large states. The constitution also claims that each state has to have at least one Representative in Congress, and there can be a maximum of one Representative for every 30,000 free people (Doc D). These rights are based on democratic views because if they had based the taxes and number of Representatives on the number of states, the rich and important people/states would have had all the power in the government. But with equal representation, the people would be able to help control the decisions made in Congress.
The movie "High Flying Bird" and Harry Edwards' book "The Revolt of the Black Athlete" both explore the complex connection between sports and social issues, specifically the difficulties faced by black athletes and the concept of the political athlete. This essay will examine how the themes from the book were incorporated into the movie and will also examine its portrayal of the political athlete. In addition, how the growth of certain characters were either influenced by Harry Edwards’ book or not. "High Flying Bird" presented a case of the issues that surfaced during the NBA lockout. In terms of what was being offered to them for their talent, the young players were being treated unfairly.
An issue such as medical marijuana, the federal government allows states to make and enforce laws in their own states. States such as Washington, California,
