ipl-logo

Comparing Antony's Speeches Of Brutus1 And Antony

2430 Words10 Pages

Brutus1 and Antony had two very different speeches. [To] began, the senators of Rome murder Caesar brutally in the senate after convincing him to come (and) have "drinks like friends". The senators all take stabs at Caesar and then finally kill him [They] did not have the greatest plan after they killed him though. (Antony] **is furiated (and) wants to start a war. [Brutus) goes out first onto the podium (and) gives a speech to all of Rome. I Thel people of Rome are on Brutus' side (but) then Antony gives his speech (and) they all agree with Antons and switch to his side. [This] **is exactly what Antony wanted (and) this **was his first few steps into starting a war. [Brutus| targeted his speech more towards the logos side by using logic (and) …show more content…

[Thell use of this rhetoric will be supported (throughout the speech because loving Rome will be something all Romans want to know. (This) strengthens the speech and continues to strengthen after what he says next. [Brutus] needs to explain to the Romans that Caesar was planning on doing horrible things to the country (that would affect everyone, not just the senators. (He) starts by talking about the future (that Caesar would have put in process. [Hel uses ethos and logos by telling the Romans, " Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" (Paragraph 3) [Thel people of Rome obviously don't want to be slaves (so this gets them questioning Caesar. [This **is a great use of the rhetoric because he starts off the speech( by claiming that Caesar and him were great friends (but he had his reasons on why he killed him, [By] saying how they would all become slaves strengthens Brutus's speech greatly (and draws the attention on Brutus and maybe killing Caesar was the right idea. 'Antony's] speech is great and gets the Romans on his side and helps him in trying to create a war. [He] uses many rhetorical devices (and uses loads of emotion. [His] main goal in the speech **is to draw the Romans back onto his side. [Antonyil starts by sarcastically …show more content…

[They] offered Caesar the crown multiple times but he rejected the crown each and every time. [Brutus] mentioned that Caesai **was becoming a dictator but how would he be a dictator fris supported because he just killed Caesar and looks like a traitor. (This **is a great use of thetoric because this makes Brutus look bad. (Caesar) **was presented with the great honor of a crown. (They] offered Caesar the crown multiple times but he rejected the crown each and every time. [Brutus| mentioned tha. Caesar **was becoming a dictator but how would he be a dictator if he turned down the crown. (This] **is exactly why Antony says, "You all did see that on Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?" Paragraph 3) [Antony's] applying logos by showing how he rejected the crown and isn't becoming a dictator like Brutus said he was. [This] **is effective because it **is attacking Brutus again by showing that he was lying about Caesat, this also helps Caesar by implying that he **was not becoming a harsh dictator. [Since) Antony shows that Caesar was in fact not becoming a selfish dictator it will hurt Brutus's speech and help Antony's main goal, [This]

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech

207 Words | 1 Pages

Mark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.

Read More

Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony uses rhetorical appeals and techniques in his speech to turn the people of Rome against those conspiring against Caesar. As a result, the people see Antony as a persuasive and strong leader of Rome. Antony opens his speech at Caesar’s funeral by using ethos to present himself as a credible source and a friend of Caesar. Antony states his purpose in the beginning of his speech by starting with “I come to bury

Read More

A Monuments Fight By Katy Steinmetz

739 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States there are over 400 places that the National Parks Service (NPS) protects. In Katy Steinmetz’s article “A Monumental Fight” she give some background on how the dispute over the national funding of parks started. The dispute over national parks and their funding have been a debate for over a hundred years. It started in 1906 when Teddy Roosevelt used the Antiquities Act to create eighteen national monuments. National monuments legally must have objects of scientific or historical value to become a monument.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar

227 Words | 1 Pages

In Brutus’s speech that he gave for the reason for Julius Caesar’s death, he gives examples of logos to persuade the crowd. Brutus says that the reason for Caesar’s death was because of his ambition to become the emperor. But in Antony’s speech, he claims to have presented the crown to him 3 times, and Caesar refused all 3 times. Brutus claims his reason for aiding in the murder of Caesar was, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” but Anthony also stated “For Brutus as you know was Caesar’s angel.”

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

437 Words | 2 Pages

After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar

528 Words | 3 Pages

So he kills him. At his funeral Antony and Brutus give a speech. Antony’s speech was better in the fact that he used logical examples as to let the people of Rome form their own opinions, whereas Brutus’ focuses on his own feelings and opinions. Antony is using logos to say that Caesar is not ambitious, while Brutus uses

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos And Logos

665 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Brutus’s speech he continues to tell the crowd how

Read More

Brutus And Antony Rhetorical Devices

678 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus and Antony’s speech really shows how important rhetoric is to present a good argument. During Act III, scene II of Julius Caesar, Rome is mourning the loss of Caesar after he is stabbed by the conspirators. Antony, Caesar’s best friend, joins the conspirators to seem like he is on their side. Antony’s final goal is to get revenge on them and start a civil war to avenge Caesar. He makes an agreement that he will not accuse or blame the conspirators in his speech at Caesar’s funeral.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

792 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus begins his speech in Act III, scene ii, at Caesar's funeral, with an upset crowd questioning his motives for killing Caesar. The crowd’s initial reaction to Brutus is that he is honorable and venerated, but still needs to explain why Caesar was assassinated. Brutus tells the crowd that he did not kill Caesar because he didn’t care for him, but he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more. In addition, that if Caesar were still alive and king, all of the people would die slaves, and claims that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Brutus is able to persuade the crowd that he had honorable intentions for killing Caesar through the use of rhetoric-ethos, logos, and pathos.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

552 Words | 3 Pages

Most times, when one thing is said, two things can be heard. The intent of the speech can be genuine and straightforward, or hidden in double-think and entendre. In Julius Caesar, this is the case with the dichotomy between Brutus and Marc Antony's speeches. the speeches both are given to sway the crowd to one side, and both use the tools of pathos, ethos, and antithesis to lead the country to their rallying cry.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis

754 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus tries to impress the crowd by saying that Caesar was going to become a dictator. “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (ii. III.L 22-24). Brutus gives this reason to make the people think this murderous act was honorable.

Read More

Analyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'

922 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Comparing Antony's Speeches Of Brutus1 And Antony

Related Topics

Open Document