ipl-logo

Comparing Machiavelli And Lao-Tzu: The Role Of A Leader

685 Words3 Pages

In today’s society, the roles of a leader not only provide the governmental structure that maintains said society but provides decisions from the mind and soul that are fundamental and essential. Even though fear can install unlimited power to the leader, a leader should rule with honesty and integrity. The government is necessary to society, but many people may question the way it is governed. Whether it is by being feared or by being loved, fear can only get someone so far in life. Love may be something strong, but it is better than to be feared. Because having a leader that is not feared will not bring hatred, love does not weaken in the way fear does, and fear will only darken the soul while love enriches and enlightens. (T) (TS) First, …show more content…

However, if people fear, you are only dealing with one factor in governing. Moreover, it has a limited one. Fear is a natural response to danger. As a leader, if you want people to make a change, make a difference, you need their love. On the other hand, Machiavelli believes that the necessity for a successful leader is to take control and that it is necessary to maintain power, at any cost. While Lao-Tzu believes that letting things flow on its own without taking control will have a better effect, not only in being a good leader but having a good relationship with the people. Many can agree that fear will achieve more than love, or that fear will only get a leader to some degree of power. …show more content…

This can cause people to get together and conspire to try to overthrow the government. Because a leader can have power by using fear, but in the end, the people of the country have the most power. Lao-Tzu believes it is far off better to have a relationship that is good for the people, which is. What Lao-Tzu says is “Next best is a leader who is loved, next one who is feared, the worst is one who is despised.” (Lao-Tzu 207). The bond a leader has with his people will lay a base for the backbone of his land. If people do not like whoever the leader is, they will presumably not follow the orders or listen. Which will result from the fall of the country. A leader should always try to encourage his or her people instead of using fear. A leader should be able to cast significant influence the people into doing what is right instead of punishing them for making them do what is right. Most definitely people will listen to someone that they respect, and the only way to gain respect from someone is to have a good relationship with them.

Show More
Related

Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Lao Tzu

154 Words | 1 Pages

Both have different opinions on what a leader should or should not be. Even though Machiavelli and Lao Tzu are in two completely different time periods both of them do make great points

Read More

Cassius As A Leader In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

1081 Words | 5 Pages

In life there are few leaders and many followers. Leaders will heavily influence their followers as well as their opposers. In times of crisis, citizens will look upon their leaders for guidance. They trust that the leader will construct an efficient solution, and that the solution benefits everyone. Truly good leaders will sway their followers towards a noble intention, an intention that will contribute to the common good.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Pizan And Machiavelli The Prince

1056 Words | 5 Pages

Then for Machiavelli he talks about how a prince should show no fear instead for him to show that he is the one with power. That a prince's people should fear him. Both authors go on to talk on how their people react based on the prince and princesse act. The authors then go on to explain how they should view and run their people. Both authors also reflect the fact that the way their people are going to act towards them is mainly based off of how they treat them.

Read More

Similarities Between Frederick Douglass And Machiavelli

819 Words | 4 Pages

Machiavelli expressed that it is good to be loved, but when it comes down to controversial decisions, fear is vital among members of a country. Machiavelli also believed that if citizens of a country feared a leader, they would always be forced to stay loyal. He believed in a totalitarian government. Machiavelli wanted a harsh government with unlimited power and unfair citizen standards. Fear of individuals seen as essential is very similar to slaveholders' views. "

Read More

Compare And Contrast Abigail Williams And John Proctor

1817 Words | 8 Pages

The effectiveness of a leader lives and dies on the decisions that leader makes. It is a leader's job not only to make decisions that will be successful but to make decisions in a way that will be followed as well. When a leader commits to a decision that they have made and does not waiver from it, at very least it gives off the appearance of strength. It is human nature to follow the leader who we view as the strongest; the one who we see as giving us the best chance of survival. However, humans also tend to follow leaders who make decisions that they see as most beneficial to them; either out of respect for the leader or fear of something else.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Nicolo Machiavelli And Lao-Tzu

1386 Words | 6 Pages

Lao-Tzu’s writing is mainly based off the religion Taoism. This type of religion believes that the way of the universe is the natural way of life and that it shouldn’t be interfered with by man. Lao-Tzu believes that one shouldn’t have total control of the government, that everything should run its course as it is supposed to do not as the humans want to make it. He believes that the ruler should be carefree and should not rule forcefully but be kind and silent. That he should stay in the shadows

Read More

Compare And Contrast Lincoln And John F Kennedy

692 Words | 3 Pages

In history there have been cases of rulers and kings and leaders that have had many different methods in their style of ruling, the two most popular styles being fear and love. There has been a debate between these two ideologies, many people believe love is better due to leaders like many U.S. presidents like John F. Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln. However, there have been many more examples leaders instilling fear into not only their own people, but also the entire world. By giving the entire world a shock it empowers the nation and the leader. By using fear to lead a nation it gives a sort of respect to the leader’s country as well as giving control over the leader’s own people so a rebellion does not occur.

Read More

Lao Tsu Vs Machiavelli

177 Words | 1 Pages

Lao Tsu once said "If a little kingdom is lowly towards a great kingdom it will take possession of the great kingdom", on the other end Niccolo Machiavelli argues that a leader not act lowly, but be feared by his people and other rulers. Christine Pizan adds in, that a ruler not be feared or lowly but to be mutually respected. However, each ruler cannot obey either teachings without employing hypocrisy, the act of behaving differently from the own perceived beliefs or moral code. To follow Lao Tsu is to humble oneself, with the intention of gaining more, by listening to Machiavelli one must use deceit to appease and maintain efficacy of a government. To adhere to Pizans teachings is to make use of relationships often with the

Read More

Machiavelli's Analysis

1953 Words | 8 Pages

To lead a country and citizens to greatness is no easy feat, especially when failure carries great risk and and sometimes irreversible consequences. Governing a country requires much thought and strategy and is something a leader should constantly work at to improve in order to succeed. I strongly believe that careful planning and execution, as well as being moderate but firm are the ways one should adapt as opposed to allowing things to take its own course with hardly any control at all as per Lao Tzu’s suggestion to be a great leader. Despite controversy and much discussion on Machiavelli’s ideas, I find that he provides a practical guide to statecraft, albeit somewhat forceful and may come off as cruel to some people. A strong, firm, but not overpowering authority will successfully defend his country from external forces and at the same time keep internal affairs in harmony.

Read More

Machiavelli The Prince Chapter 17 Summary

764 Words | 4 Pages

However, if he were to only be one of these, it would be best to be feared. Again, Machiavelli bases his opinion on his disbelief in the integrity of human beings. In chapter 17, he states, “For love is held by a chain of duty which, since men are bad, they break at every chance of their own profit; but fear is held by a dread of punishment that never fails you.” This is another case in which Machiavelli’s point of view may work for his time, but not today’s. In Machiavelli’s day, a ruler had sole authority over his country, and obedience was expected from every one of his subjects.

Read More

Plato Vs Machiavelli

429 Words | 2 Pages

He believes anyone can rule a polis if they have virtu. Once a ruler, a simple rule to follow to maintain power and not to be hated by the people, is to “not take away a man’s possession or woman”, Machiavelli believes the people will not feel threaten by following this rule, thus maintaining a stable polis. He expresses how “human nature never changes”, and that people are self-interested and they can turn against you once you are not profiting them. A good ruler must have the strength to do whatever it takes to obtain and maintain power, which essentially means that even if they have to hurt some of the people for the benefit of the popular mass, then they shall do so for the greater cause. Both Plato and Machiavelli believe that there must be a government in order for human kind to survive.

Read More

Machiavelli's Ideas Of An Efficient Political Power

1166 Words | 5 Pages

A ruler should not aim to be loved because men are wicked and ungrateful. Machiavelli believes that men will betray their ruler "at every opportunity of their own utility" (Machiavelli 67). On the contrary, a ruler should be feared so that his men will never betrayal him because of the dread of punishment. This type of fear, servile fear, is different to Catherines idea of filial fear of God. Like Catherine's beliefs, Machiavelli also believes that an effective ruler should be merciful to those that deserve it.

Read More

Analysis Of Lao-Tzu's A World Of Ideas

1215 Words | 5 Pages

In “A World of Ideas” excerpt of Tao-te Ching, Lao-tzu speaks about how “The Master” should lead the people; this is an analogy to how a ruler, or a governing body, should govern its people. In Verse 57 of the Tao-te Ching, Lao-tzu instructs leaders to return to the Tao and let the people govern themselves. He says a government that involves itself in its people’s lives too much will have a negative effect. Lao-tzu’s explanation on how a government should govern its people is still relevant in today’s political environment. Lao-Tzu says that the people become less virtuous when their government places more prohibitions on them.

Read More

Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

1034 Words | 5 Pages

Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

Read More

The Principles Of Leadership In The Prince By Machiavelli

1238 Words | 5 Pages

According to Machiavelli, a successful leader should to exhibit a certain character which is key to their success. He highlights five key qualities that a leader should possess A leader should be feared by the people. According to Machiavelli, it is better to be feared than loved. He believed that the people were less likely to revolt if they feared the leader

Read More

More about Comparing Machiavelli And Lao-Tzu: The Role Of A Leader

Related Topics

Open Document