Comparing The Law Of Life And On A Mountain Trail

675 Words3 Pages

In the stories, “On A Mountain Trail” and “The Law of Life”, both the authors discuss and use wolves in the stories. Using wolves in literature is very common. A lot of authors see the beauty and mischief they hold within themselves. I have read countless stories where wolves tend to be involved. They can be known as predators and sneaky four leggeds. In other stories, they can be read as beautiful and mysterious. Furthermore, wolves are a common animal, because there personalities can be used to fit the roles of animals continuously. The purpose for these authors writing these well worded stories was to portray how fragile life can be. In their life they probably had an experience that impacted them to write about it. Knowing that it was so …show more content…

Having as much knowledge as they do, the authors had to comprehend every story and conversation the characters had. Just knowing that the stories weren’t told by the two travelers and a family, tells me that the authors were creative. Being able to tell such stories seems difficult and outstretched. But if you have thoughts, examples and ideas. You can make most of it happen. Authors have been using wolves in their literature for thousands of years. The earliest book known to man that contributed to wolves was in 1281 when an Englishman noticed something dog like but enormous. Since then, many fables and tales were written. It was said that they were not yet revealed to man versus nature series. I have researched evidence and answers as to why they are so common in stories. Many authors portray them as “natures dog”. Wolves are big and scary. Which would make them the perfect enemy. Some say that they’re just what come to the top of their head and have no explanation. Yet, they can also mean luck, and the look of a wolf is so intimidating, but you become so infatuated with their