Comparing 'The Untrue Story Of John Smith And Pocahontas'

607 Words3 Pages

How does Reginal Walters separate the truth from the lies? Do you believe in the story of Pocahontas and John Smith, because it's not so true after all. For instance you may think the story of Pocahontas was your typical love story but there was much more to discover under that. The story may seem true but Smith told a different story, more different from the untrue story. In the Article “The Untrue Story of John Smith and Pocahontas” Reginald Walters explains how the story of Pocahontas didn't really make sense and there were events that were most likely not true. You may be surprised by some of the changes in the actual Pocahontas story. In the (untrue) story many things were found to be a lie. Reading this will explain how different the …show more content…

The story states ¨After they had presented him with a feast in their barbarous manner, they held a long discussion¨. The word ¨barbarous¨ means savage or unpleasant.Therefore, the people did not like Smith and already started to treat him wrong. The article also states "They dragged him to them and laid his head on the stones, ready with their clubs to beat out his brains”. The words “beat out his friends” means they were going to kill him with no sympathy at all. It is evident how Powhatan and all of his attendants needed Smith; a horrible man they considered a …show more content…

The author writes in the article“Inside was known only to Powhatan and his advisers who did not write historical accounts, and Smith, who did”. This implies that John was the only one who told these stories, so they could be fiction and he lied”. Another quote to support this is “In a letter written soon after his capture, Smith says nothing of Pocahontas. So who could really believe anything he said?” This quote indicates there was no verification on what Smith really wrote about. It could have written about anything whether it was about Powhatan, his advisors, or Pocahontas when he said it