In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.
“And public reasons shall be rendered Of Caesar’s death.” (Act III, Scene II) In the play, “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar was killed by a group of conspirators who believed that his rule would result in the downfall of Rome, and that his death was the best solution. Marcus Brutus, who was viewed as the leader of the plot to kill Caesar, was the first to speak at his funeral, followed by Marc Antony. Each man’s speech included several examples of rhetorical strategies that ultimately swayed the audience to be in favor of one side or another. Marcus Brutus gave the better, more argumentative speech due to his effective use of rhetorical strategies.
However, they were not alone- with Mark Antony rising in fury for justice to Caesar. Each opposer gave a speech at the funeral of Caesar for their cause. Brutus in formality, attempted to convey his reasoning in executing the murder, as a representative of the conspirators. Using many rhetorical devices including pathos and logos, the crowd is swooned with his perception. Brutus's victory is short lived, because as soon as Mark Antony steps up, his tactics of persuasion,
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony gives a speech after the murder of Julius Caesar. Antony wanted to persuade the Romans how Caesar’s death was unjust and Brutus was wrong to kill Caesar. Antony was a loyal friend to Caesar and he was upset and angry about Caesar’s death. Antony wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. But, in order to do so, Antony needed to persuade the Romans to be on his side.
Rhetorical Analysis 2 Caesar's funeral was meant to serve as a memorial to his honor and accomplishments. But both Brutus and Marc Antony seized the opportunity to try to lure the crowd into believing their version of the story, and follow them in the next chapter of Rome. Brutus was the first to speak with blood still on his hands, and he gave his speech in prose using ethos as his main weapon. Marc Antonty spoke next, using blank verse.
In the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the emperor of Rome is killed by his best friend, Brutus. At the funeral of the fallen ruler, Brutus gives a big speech to the crowd. He tries to explain why he and the other senators had to kill the emperor, Julius Caesar. In the speech, he informs them that Caesar was too ambitious, and says he chose Rome over his dear friend. Once Brutus was done, Marc Antony gave his speech to persuade the crowd that Julius wasn’t ambitious at all.
Some Romans might have believed that Marcus Brutus had a more impactful speech during the death of Julius Caesar in 44 B.C.E. Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, created in 1599, explores ambition, betrayal, and political power in the events surrounding Caesar's 44 BCE assassination. The plot follows Cassius and Brutus' conspiracy, the aftermath, and the ensuing civil war. Key characters include Julius Caesar, Brutus, Cassius, Mark Antony, and Octavius Caesar. Famous quotes include "Et tu, Brute?" and Antony's "Friends, Romans, Countrymen" speech.
Mark Antony is allowed to speak at Caesar’s funeral by Brutus and Cassius in the play Julius Caesar. He addresses the people of Rome as his Friend, Romans, countrymen. While using rhetorical strategies such as logos, pathos, and ethos. Along with Antony’s speech Martin Luther King Jr. , in his speech I have a dream, is addressing the people before him for the civil rights movement at the Lincoln Memorial. He also uses the same rhetorical strategies as Antony, logos, pathos, and ethos.
Brutus explains that he loved Caesar and respected how he ruled over Rome. But he loved Rome more and that is the reason he tells the attendees at the funeral that he killed Caesar. He states, “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved him more.
Antony tells facts, “implementing logic”, that the people have witnessed and that’s why his speech is better than Brutus’s. Antony giving facts that the people know of using lothos, ethos, and pathos in his speech was a great way for his speech to be much better than Brutus’s. As Brutus is speaking about Caesar during his funeral he remind the people that they did love him indeed, but what Brutus has done is far greater than what Caesar would have done. “did love him once, not without cause: What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” (2.2.30-31).
Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
Philosophes of the Enlightenment Baron de Montesquieu was a French philosopher who was most known for his idea of having an equal system of governments. He was born in Bordeaux, France on 18th January 1869 to a wealthy family who had once done services for the royal family. Montesquieu was a sharp social writer and a political thinker. He gained a lot of respect after publishing the The Spirit of Laws which was about how governments should work. He also established the idea of a separation of powers:legislative, executive and judicial.
Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with
Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-
Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
