ipl-logo

Comparison Of Plessy Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. Board Of Education

1887 Words8 Pages

Racial segregation was a hugely common act back then. Many cases related to that occurred. The Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were two important landmarks cases. The two cases changed many things in their society at that time. Numerous subjects were discussed. Overall, the explanation of the Plessy v Ferguson case was that the railroad act was “separate but equal”( Street Law, inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court). However, they discuss more than just the quote “separate but equal”( Street Law, inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court). When the court makes a decision there is the majority and minority opinion, the two opinions are different taking in account how they viewed the case. What were the judges decisions …show more content…

While the minority decision well there wasn’t one, one judge decided not to cast their vote. Key precedent, “something that sets a standard for future events” ( “Precedent”. The Free Dictionary, Farlex, legal-dictionary, thefreedictionary.com). Attorneys/lawyers most likely have a key precedent to present in their case from another case that has similars to the case they have now. There were key precedents on the Plessy v Ferguson case. As well as, the case Brown v Board of Education played an important role in changing our society to what it is now. With pleasure

What exactly happened in the Plessy v Ferguson case? What was the conflict they were arguing about? The outcome of the case? “In a 7-1 decision the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ferguson” (Street Law, inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court). They rejected Plessy’s statement about about this …show more content…

Board of Education, the case that was based on the separation of races at school. The Supreme Court ruled on the side of Brown, ruling that the practice of segregation was unconstitutional but refused to apply its decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion for the court and case. The justices acknowledged that public education was “central to American life” (Street Law, inc, “Landmark cases of the U.S. Supreme Court). They called it “the very foundation of good citizenship” (Street Law, inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court) they also knew that public education was not only important to prepare children for their future and to enable them to participate in the democratic process, but it was “a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values” (Street Law inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court) that are in their communities. According to the justices, they concluded that it would be difficult for a child to succeed in life without an adequate education. Being able to receive a equal education like the whites was your right as a citizen of America. The justices argued that separating children entirely on race created a feeling of lowliness in the “hearts and minds of African American children” (Street Law, inc, “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court”). Separating children in public education created the idea that African Americans had a low status in the communities. In spite of, both separate

Open Document