Conceptual Underpinnings Of Research Essay

• Does the report describe an explicit theoretical or conceptual framework for the study? If not, does the absence of a framework detract from the usefulness or significance of the research? o Polit and Beck (2017) define a theoretical framework as the overall conceptual underpinnings of a study which is based on theory. Polit and Beck (2017) go on to discuss how a study’s framework is not an explicit theory or conceptual model in most nursing studies. In the article by Rodwell, Brunetto, Demir, Shacklock, and Farr-Wharton (2014), the authors familiarize the reader with information on the appraisal theory from Lazarus and colleagues.

• Does the report adequately describe the major features of the theory or model so that readers can understand

(2014) state that research has examined the effects of personal attacks from abusive supervision, but that little attention has been paid to behaviors from abusive supervision related to employee work tasks and supervisor undermining. Rodwell, et al. (2014), define how per the appraisal theory, encounters can be distinguished in one the following three ways: irrelevant, benign-positive, or stressful. For example, employee work tasks that do not do immediate harm even though they are intended to per abusive supervision would be appraised as stressful (Rodwell, et al., 2014). This is an appropriate and fitting framework for the research

(2014) states the primary aim of the study is to examine forms of abusive supervision such as personal attacks, task attacks, and isolation, and identify their possible links to health and work outcomes for nurses such as job satisfaction, psychological strain, and intentions to quit. The framework of the study by Rodwell, et al. (2014) is based on a conceptual model of nursing in the authors’ hypothesized model in Figure 1. Rodwell, et al. (2014) notes that Figure 1 illustrates the theoretically proposed links via the stress appraisals and coping processes suggested